{"title":"曲线拟合问题再次出现","authors":"Oliver Buchholz","doi":"10.1007/s13194-026-00772-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The curve-fitting problem refers to the task of fitting a mathematical function to given observations. According to the standard analysis of the problem, this task involves a trade-off between simplicity and in-sample accuracy. Furthermore, when the goal is to use the fitted function for making predictions, simplicity and in-sample accuracy have to be balanced to avoid under- and overfitting and, thus, impeding the function’s predictive accuracy. This paper revisits the standard analysis of the curve-fitting problem in light of recent advances in statistics and machine learning. I show that applications of deep neural networks involve the curve-fitting problem for they are also concerned with fitting a mathematical function to given observations. Surprisingly, however, deep neural networks apparently undermine the standard analysis of the curve-fitting problem: they commonly exhibit high predictive accuracy without the need to actively balance simplicity and in-sample accuracy. I explore the implications of this phenomenon and argue that, nevertheless, the standard analysis of the curve-fitting problem can be saved under a suitable definition of simplicity. I also highlight how this renews the challenge to justify simplicity as a methodological norm in curve fitting.","PeriodicalId":48832,"journal":{"name":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The curve-fitting problem revisited\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Buchholz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13194-026-00772-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The curve-fitting problem refers to the task of fitting a mathematical function to given observations. According to the standard analysis of the problem, this task involves a trade-off between simplicity and in-sample accuracy. Furthermore, when the goal is to use the fitted function for making predictions, simplicity and in-sample accuracy have to be balanced to avoid under- and overfitting and, thus, impeding the function’s predictive accuracy. This paper revisits the standard analysis of the curve-fitting problem in light of recent advances in statistics and machine learning. I show that applications of deep neural networks involve the curve-fitting problem for they are also concerned with fitting a mathematical function to given observations. Surprisingly, however, deep neural networks apparently undermine the standard analysis of the curve-fitting problem: they commonly exhibit high predictive accuracy without the need to actively balance simplicity and in-sample accuracy. I explore the implications of this phenomenon and argue that, nevertheless, the standard analysis of the curve-fitting problem can be saved under a suitable definition of simplicity. I also highlight how this renews the challenge to justify simplicity as a methodological norm in curve fitting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal for Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal for Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00772-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal for Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00772-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract The curve-fitting problem refers to the task of fitting a mathematical function to given observations. According to the standard analysis of the problem, this task involves a trade-off between simplicity and in-sample accuracy. Furthermore, when the goal is to use the fitted function for making predictions, simplicity and in-sample accuracy have to be balanced to avoid under- and overfitting and, thus, impeding the function’s predictive accuracy. This paper revisits the standard analysis of the curve-fitting problem in light of recent advances in statistics and machine learning. I show that applications of deep neural networks involve the curve-fitting problem for they are also concerned with fitting a mathematical function to given observations. Surprisingly, however, deep neural networks apparently undermine the standard analysis of the curve-fitting problem: they commonly exhibit high predictive accuracy without the need to actively balance simplicity and in-sample accuracy. I explore the implications of this phenomenon and argue that, nevertheless, the standard analysis of the curve-fitting problem can be saved under a suitable definition of simplicity. I also highlight how this renews the challenge to justify simplicity as a methodological norm in curve fitting.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal for Philosophy of Science publishes groundbreaking works that can deepen understanding of the concepts and methods of the sciences, as they explore increasingly many facets of the world we live in. It is of direct interest to philosophers of science coming from different perspectives, as well as scientists, citizens and policymakers. The journal is interested in articles from all traditions and all backgrounds, as long as they engage with the sciences in a constructive, and critical, way. The journal represents the various longstanding European philosophical traditions engaging with the sciences, but welcomes articles from every part of the world.