Azadeh Alavi, Hamidreza Khalili, Stanley M H Chan, Fatemeh Kouchmeshki, Muhammad Usman, Ross Vlahos
{"title":"预测实验性慢性阻塞性肺疾病骨骼肌预后的几何和量子核方法。","authors":"Azadeh Alavi, Hamidreza Khalili, Stanley M H Chan, Fatemeh Kouchmeshki, Muhammad Usman, Ross Vlahos","doi":"10.1038/s41598-026-65964-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skeletal-muscle dysfunction is an important extrapulmonary feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but advanced computational representations require conservative evaluation in small preclinical cohorts. We analysed a cigarette-smoke mouse model of experimental COPD comprising 213 animals with blood and bronchoalveolar-lavage biomarkers to predict tibialis anterior muscle weight, muscle quality, and force. We developed a kernel-geometric quantum hybrid method in which synthetic symmetric positive definite (SPD) references are mapped through a reproducing-kernel Hilbert space, compressed using train-only random projection, normalised, and supplied to low-dimensional simulated quantum regression circuits. We benchmarked this approach against classical Ridge/kernel models, SPD relational representations, and quantum-kernel regression using identical condition-stratified repeated cross-validation folds. Results were endpoint-specific. Biomarker-only Ridge had the lowest RMSE for force, indicating that a compact linear model was sufficient for this endpoint in the present cohort. Synth_ROSE had the numerically lowest RMSE for muscle weight and muscle quality, but paired fold-level testing did not establish statistically significant superiority after Holm adjustment. These findings support leakage-controlled, endpoint-specific benchmarking of SPD and simulated quantum feature maps, not claims of clinical readiness, quantum hardware advantage, or definitive superiority over classical learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13562544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geometric and quantum kernel methods for predicting skeletal muscle outcomes in experimental chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.\",\"authors\":\"Azadeh Alavi, Hamidreza Khalili, Stanley M H Chan, Fatemeh Kouchmeshki, Muhammad Usman, Ross Vlahos\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-026-65964-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Skeletal-muscle dysfunction is an important extrapulmonary feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but advanced computational representations require conservative evaluation in small preclinical cohorts. We analysed a cigarette-smoke mouse model of experimental COPD comprising 213 animals with blood and bronchoalveolar-lavage biomarkers to predict tibialis anterior muscle weight, muscle quality, and force. We developed a kernel-geometric quantum hybrid method in which synthetic symmetric positive definite (SPD) references are mapped through a reproducing-kernel Hilbert space, compressed using train-only random projection, normalised, and supplied to low-dimensional simulated quantum regression circuits. We benchmarked this approach against classical Ridge/kernel models, SPD relational representations, and quantum-kernel regression using identical condition-stratified repeated cross-validation folds. Results were endpoint-specific. Biomarker-only Ridge had the lowest RMSE for force, indicating that a compact linear model was sufficient for this endpoint in the present cohort. Synth_ROSE had the numerically lowest RMSE for muscle weight and muscle quality, but paired fold-level testing did not establish statistically significant superiority after Holm adjustment. These findings support leakage-controlled, endpoint-specific benchmarking of SPD and simulated quantum feature maps, not claims of clinical readiness, quantum hardware advantage, or definitive superiority over classical learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13562544/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-65964-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-65964-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Geometric and quantum kernel methods for predicting skeletal muscle outcomes in experimental chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Skeletal-muscle dysfunction is an important extrapulmonary feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but advanced computational representations require conservative evaluation in small preclinical cohorts. We analysed a cigarette-smoke mouse model of experimental COPD comprising 213 animals with blood and bronchoalveolar-lavage biomarkers to predict tibialis anterior muscle weight, muscle quality, and force. We developed a kernel-geometric quantum hybrid method in which synthetic symmetric positive definite (SPD) references are mapped through a reproducing-kernel Hilbert space, compressed using train-only random projection, normalised, and supplied to low-dimensional simulated quantum regression circuits. We benchmarked this approach against classical Ridge/kernel models, SPD relational representations, and quantum-kernel regression using identical condition-stratified repeated cross-validation folds. Results were endpoint-specific. Biomarker-only Ridge had the lowest RMSE for force, indicating that a compact linear model was sufficient for this endpoint in the present cohort. Synth_ROSE had the numerically lowest RMSE for muscle weight and muscle quality, but paired fold-level testing did not establish statistically significant superiority after Holm adjustment. These findings support leakage-controlled, endpoint-specific benchmarking of SPD and simulated quantum feature maps, not claims of clinical readiness, quantum hardware advantage, or definitive superiority over classical learning.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.