保健学生的健康不平等教育:学生的观点告知全科和初级保健课程。

IF 1.2 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Lucy Baxter, Achele Agada, Sonia Elks, Halia Shah, Judith Ibison
{"title":"保健学生的健康不平等教育:学生的观点告知全科和初级保健课程。","authors":"Lucy Baxter, Achele Agada, Sonia Elks, Halia Shah, Judith Ibison","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2026.2718210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health inequalities education is increasingly recognised as essential in healthcare training, particularly for generalist and primary care practice, yet undergraduate provision is inconsistent, shallow and often tokenistic. Students report limited opportunities to apply learning meaningfully in clinical settings. This study explores healthcare students' experiences and preferences for pedagogy to inform curriculum development relevant to primary care. An online survey, informed by literature and student collaborators, collected data from 50 students across more than 10 healthcare programmes. Descriptive frequency analysis guided questions for a student-led virtual focus group (<i>n</i> = 5). Focus group data underwent reflective thematic analysis to identify pedagogical preferences transferable to primary care education. Most respondents (78%) agreed health inequalities education is relevant to future practice, and 86% wanted more teaching. Only 34% reported consistent coverage, and 56% felt teaching applied to clinical practice. Students strongly preferred hearing from patients and service users (92%) and favoured interactive formats over lectures. Thematic analysis revealed four insights: teaching often lacks authenticity; case scenarios risk reinforcing stereotypes; reflective practice and patient narratives enhance understanding; and educator preparedness and positionality influence learning. Students highlighted the need for practical skill development, authentic stories and safe, critically reflective learning spaces. Students want education to move beyond theoretical awareness towards application, reflection and authentic engagement. Optimal pedagogy should prioritise co-produced patient narratives, interactive learning, realistic scenarios, educator preparation and aligned assessment. Curriculum reform must focus on better design rather than more content, equipping students to address inequities in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health inequalities education in healthcare students: student perspectives to inform generalist and primary care curricula.\",\"authors\":\"Lucy Baxter, Achele Agada, Sonia Elks, Halia Shah, Judith Ibison\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14739879.2026.2718210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health inequalities education is increasingly recognised as essential in healthcare training, particularly for generalist and primary care practice, yet undergraduate provision is inconsistent, shallow and often tokenistic. Students report limited opportunities to apply learning meaningfully in clinical settings. This study explores healthcare students' experiences and preferences for pedagogy to inform curriculum development relevant to primary care. An online survey, informed by literature and student collaborators, collected data from 50 students across more than 10 healthcare programmes. Descriptive frequency analysis guided questions for a student-led virtual focus group (<i>n</i> = 5). Focus group data underwent reflective thematic analysis to identify pedagogical preferences transferable to primary care education. Most respondents (78%) agreed health inequalities education is relevant to future practice, and 86% wanted more teaching. Only 34% reported consistent coverage, and 56% felt teaching applied to clinical practice. Students strongly preferred hearing from patients and service users (92%) and favoured interactive formats over lectures. Thematic analysis revealed four insights: teaching often lacks authenticity; case scenarios risk reinforcing stereotypes; reflective practice and patient narratives enhance understanding; and educator preparedness and positionality influence learning. Students highlighted the need for practical skill development, authentic stories and safe, critically reflective learning spaces. Students want education to move beyond theoretical awareness towards application, reflection and authentic engagement. Optimal pedagogy should prioritise co-produced patient narratives, interactive learning, realistic scenarios, educator preparation and aligned assessment. Curriculum reform must focus on better design rather than more content, equipping students to address inequities in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education for Primary Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education for Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2026.2718210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2026.2718210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

健康不平等教育日益被认为是医疗保健培训的关键,特别是对于全科医生和初级保健实践,但本科提供的内容不一致,肤浅且往往是象征性的。学生报告说,在临床环境中有意义地应用所学知识的机会有限。本研究旨在探讨医疗保健专业学生对初级保健相关课程的教学经验及偏好。一项由文献和学生合作者提供信息的在线调查收集了来自10多个医疗保健项目的50名学生的数据。描述性频率分析引导学生主导的虚拟焦点小组(n = 5)的问题。焦点小组数据进行了反思性专题分析,以确定可转移到初级保健教育的教学偏好。大多数受访者(78%)同意卫生不平等教育与未来的实践有关,86%的人希望更多的教学。只有34%的人报告了一致的覆盖范围,56%的人认为教学应用于临床实践。学生们非常喜欢听取患者和服务使用者的意见(92%),并且更喜欢互动形式而不是讲座。主题分析揭示了四个启示:教学往往缺乏真实性;案例情景有强化刻板印象的风险;反思性实践和患者叙述增强了理解;教育者的准备和定位影响学习。学生们强调了对实践技能发展、真实故事和安全、批判性反思学习空间的需求。学生们希望教育超越理论意识,转向应用、反思和真正的参与。最佳的教学方法应该优先考虑共同制作的患者叙述、互动学习、现实情景、教育者准备和一致的评估。课程改革必须注重更好的设计,而不是更多的内容,使学生能够解决初级保健中的不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health inequalities education in healthcare students: student perspectives to inform generalist and primary care curricula.

Health inequalities education is increasingly recognised as essential in healthcare training, particularly for generalist and primary care practice, yet undergraduate provision is inconsistent, shallow and often tokenistic. Students report limited opportunities to apply learning meaningfully in clinical settings. This study explores healthcare students' experiences and preferences for pedagogy to inform curriculum development relevant to primary care. An online survey, informed by literature and student collaborators, collected data from 50 students across more than 10 healthcare programmes. Descriptive frequency analysis guided questions for a student-led virtual focus group (n = 5). Focus group data underwent reflective thematic analysis to identify pedagogical preferences transferable to primary care education. Most respondents (78%) agreed health inequalities education is relevant to future practice, and 86% wanted more teaching. Only 34% reported consistent coverage, and 56% felt teaching applied to clinical practice. Students strongly preferred hearing from patients and service users (92%) and favoured interactive formats over lectures. Thematic analysis revealed four insights: teaching often lacks authenticity; case scenarios risk reinforcing stereotypes; reflective practice and patient narratives enhance understanding; and educator preparedness and positionality influence learning. Students highlighted the need for practical skill development, authentic stories and safe, critically reflective learning spaces. Students want education to move beyond theoretical awareness towards application, reflection and authentic engagement. Optimal pedagogy should prioritise co-produced patient narratives, interactive learning, realistic scenarios, educator preparation and aligned assessment. Curriculum reform must focus on better design rather than more content, equipping students to address inequities in primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书