焦点,干预特异性和滴定:哪些人工智能工具适合精神卫生保健?

IF 6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Joshua S Steinberg, William Thies, John R Weisz
{"title":"焦点,干预特异性和滴定:哪些人工智能工具适合精神卫生保健?","authors":"Joshua S Steinberg, William Thies, John R Weisz","doi":"10.1037/ccp0001029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For artificial intelligence (AI) used in conjunction with psychotherapy, clinicians and clients need a principled basis for deciding which tools to engage with, and intervention designers need guidance on building tools that are most likely to be safe and effective. As the evidence base on mental health (MH)-AI safety and efficacy grows, we propose tools that are FIT: focal (bounded in problem focus), intervention-specific (bounded in therapeutic procedures), and titrated (with dose and duration calibrated to match the use case). FIT is a proposed framework, designed to reduce three specific risks that have been linked to conversational MH-AI. The dimensions are intended as practical starting guardrails, not as an exhaustive list. In this viewpoint article, the authors' argument concerns only MH-AI used in routine clinical care-tools prescribed by or used with input for guidance from a clinician. The authors leave aside fully unsupervised consumer use, which raises additional concerns beyond this viewpoint. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"94 8","pages":"453-455"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focal, intervention-specific, and titrated: Which artificial intelligence tools are FIT for mental health care?\",\"authors\":\"Joshua S Steinberg, William Thies, John R Weisz\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ccp0001029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For artificial intelligence (AI) used in conjunction with psychotherapy, clinicians and clients need a principled basis for deciding which tools to engage with, and intervention designers need guidance on building tools that are most likely to be safe and effective. As the evidence base on mental health (MH)-AI safety and efficacy grows, we propose tools that are FIT: focal (bounded in problem focus), intervention-specific (bounded in therapeutic procedures), and titrated (with dose and duration calibrated to match the use case). FIT is a proposed framework, designed to reduce three specific risks that have been linked to conversational MH-AI. The dimensions are intended as practical starting guardrails, not as an exhaustive list. In this viewpoint article, the authors' argument concerns only MH-AI used in routine clinical care-tools prescribed by or used with input for guidance from a clinician. The authors leave aside fully unsupervised consumer use, which raises additional concerns beyond this viewpoint. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology\",\"volume\":\"94 8\",\"pages\":\"453-455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0001029\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0001029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于与心理治疗结合使用的人工智能(AI),临床医生和客户需要一个原则基础来决定使用哪些工具,干预设计者需要指导,以构建最安全有效的工具。随着基于精神卫生(MH)-人工智能安全性和有效性的证据的增长,我们提出了FIT工具:焦点(限定在问题焦点上),干预特异性(限定在治疗程序上)和滴定(剂量和持续时间校准以匹配用例)。FIT是一个拟议的框架,旨在减少与对话式MH-AI相关的三个具体风险。这些尺寸旨在作为实用的启动护栏,而不是详尽的列表。在这篇观点文章中,作者的论点只涉及在常规临床护理中使用的MH-AI -由临床医生处方或与临床医生指导的输入一起使用的工具。作者撇开完全不受监督的消费者使用,这引发了超出这一观点的额外担忧。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Focal, intervention-specific, and titrated: Which artificial intelligence tools are FIT for mental health care?

For artificial intelligence (AI) used in conjunction with psychotherapy, clinicians and clients need a principled basis for deciding which tools to engage with, and intervention designers need guidance on building tools that are most likely to be safe and effective. As the evidence base on mental health (MH)-AI safety and efficacy grows, we propose tools that are FIT: focal (bounded in problem focus), intervention-specific (bounded in therapeutic procedures), and titrated (with dose and duration calibrated to match the use case). FIT is a proposed framework, designed to reduce three specific risks that have been linked to conversational MH-AI. The dimensions are intended as practical starting guardrails, not as an exhaustive list. In this viewpoint article, the authors' argument concerns only MH-AI used in routine clinical care-tools prescribed by or used with input for guidance from a clinician. The authors leave aside fully unsupervised consumer use, which raises additional concerns beyond this viewpoint. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书