在认知行为和正念治疗的随机临床试验和匹配的非寻求治疗的社区样本中,15个月的饮酒减少。

IF 6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Barbara S McCrady, Katie Witkiewitz, Alicia Shiver, Megan Swartz, Roberta Chávez, Stefan Klimaj, Eric D Claus
{"title":"在认知行为和正念治疗的随机临床试验和匹配的非寻求治疗的社区样本中,15个月的饮酒减少。","authors":"Barbara S McCrady, Katie Witkiewitz, Alicia Shiver, Megan Swartz, Roberta Chávez, Stefan Klimaj, Eric D Claus","doi":"10.1037/ccp0001025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine drinking outcomes over time among two samples recruited and assessed using similar criteria, procedures, and measures: heavy drinkers who were not seeking treatment and treatment seekers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Heavy-drinking participants were recruited for a naturalistic study of the course of alcohol use in a nonhelp-seeking community sample (N = 190) and a randomized clinical trial (N = 110) of 2-4 sessions of motivational enhancement therapy followed by eight sessions of cognitive-behavioral or mindfulness-based treatment. Alcohol use was assessed with the Timeline Followback at baseline and 3-, 9-, and 15-month follow-ups. Percent heavy drinking days was the primary outcome variable; percent drinking days and drinks per drinking day were secondary outcome variables. Propensity score analysis was used to reduce potential effects of confounding, and latent growth curve model with maximum likelihood estimation was used to assess changes in drinking over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the nonhelp-seeking community sample, the clinical sample showed greater reductions in frequency of heavy drinking and of any drinking over the 15 months of follow-up. There were no differences between treatment conditions on any outcome variable. The clinical and community samples both decreased their drinking over time with medium to large effect size reductions in the clinical sample and small effect size reductions in the community sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both samples of heavy drinkers reduced their drinking over time, but receiving behavioral treatment was associated with more substantial decreases in drinking frequency and intensity, attaining levels comparable to or below that of a community sample. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"94 8","pages":"482-495"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13523008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fifteen-month drinking reductions in a randomized clinical trial of cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based treatments and a matched nontreatment-seeking community sample.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara S McCrady, Katie Witkiewitz, Alicia Shiver, Megan Swartz, Roberta Chávez, Stefan Klimaj, Eric D Claus\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ccp0001025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine drinking outcomes over time among two samples recruited and assessed using similar criteria, procedures, and measures: heavy drinkers who were not seeking treatment and treatment seekers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Heavy-drinking participants were recruited for a naturalistic study of the course of alcohol use in a nonhelp-seeking community sample (N = 190) and a randomized clinical trial (N = 110) of 2-4 sessions of motivational enhancement therapy followed by eight sessions of cognitive-behavioral or mindfulness-based treatment. Alcohol use was assessed with the Timeline Followback at baseline and 3-, 9-, and 15-month follow-ups. Percent heavy drinking days was the primary outcome variable; percent drinking days and drinks per drinking day were secondary outcome variables. Propensity score analysis was used to reduce potential effects of confounding, and latent growth curve model with maximum likelihood estimation was used to assess changes in drinking over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the nonhelp-seeking community sample, the clinical sample showed greater reductions in frequency of heavy drinking and of any drinking over the 15 months of follow-up. There were no differences between treatment conditions on any outcome variable. The clinical and community samples both decreased their drinking over time with medium to large effect size reductions in the clinical sample and small effect size reductions in the community sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both samples of heavy drinkers reduced their drinking over time, but receiving behavioral treatment was associated with more substantial decreases in drinking frequency and intensity, attaining levels comparable to or below that of a community sample. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology\",\"volume\":\"94 8\",\"pages\":\"482-495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13523008/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0001025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0001025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过使用相似的标准、程序和测量方法招募和评估两个样本:不寻求治疗的重度饮酒者和寻求治疗的人,来检查随时间推移的饮酒结果。方法:招募重度饮酒者在非求助社区样本中进行酒精使用过程的自然研究(N = 190),随机临床试验(N = 110)进行2-4次动机增强治疗,随后进行8次认知行为或正念治疗。通过基线时间线随访和3、9、15个月随访来评估酒精使用情况。重度饮酒天数百分比是主要结局变量;饮酒日的百分比和每个饮酒日的饮酒量是次要结果变量。使用倾向得分分析来减少潜在的混杂影响,并使用最大似然估计的潜在增长曲线模型来评估饮酒随时间的变化。结果:与不寻求帮助的社区样本相比,临床样本显示,在15个月的随访中,重度饮酒和任何饮酒的频率都有更大的下降。治疗条件之间在任何结果变量上没有差异。随着时间的推移,临床和社区样本都减少了饮酒量,临床样本的效应量减少了中到大,社区样本的效应量减少了小。结论:两个重度饮酒者的样本都随着时间的推移减少了饮酒量,但接受行为治疗与饮酒频率和强度的大幅下降有关,达到与社区样本相当或低于社区样本的水平。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fifteen-month drinking reductions in a randomized clinical trial of cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based treatments and a matched nontreatment-seeking community sample.

Objective: To examine drinking outcomes over time among two samples recruited and assessed using similar criteria, procedures, and measures: heavy drinkers who were not seeking treatment and treatment seekers.

Method: Heavy-drinking participants were recruited for a naturalistic study of the course of alcohol use in a nonhelp-seeking community sample (N = 190) and a randomized clinical trial (N = 110) of 2-4 sessions of motivational enhancement therapy followed by eight sessions of cognitive-behavioral or mindfulness-based treatment. Alcohol use was assessed with the Timeline Followback at baseline and 3-, 9-, and 15-month follow-ups. Percent heavy drinking days was the primary outcome variable; percent drinking days and drinks per drinking day were secondary outcome variables. Propensity score analysis was used to reduce potential effects of confounding, and latent growth curve model with maximum likelihood estimation was used to assess changes in drinking over time.

Results: Compared with the nonhelp-seeking community sample, the clinical sample showed greater reductions in frequency of heavy drinking and of any drinking over the 15 months of follow-up. There were no differences between treatment conditions on any outcome variable. The clinical and community samples both decreased their drinking over time with medium to large effect size reductions in the clinical sample and small effect size reductions in the community sample.

Conclusions: Both samples of heavy drinkers reduced their drinking over time, but receiving behavioral treatment was associated with more substantial decreases in drinking frequency and intensity, attaining levels comparable to or below that of a community sample. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书