Barbara S McCrady, Katie Witkiewitz, Alicia Shiver, Megan Swartz, Roberta Chávez, Stefan Klimaj, Eric D Claus
{"title":"在认知行为和正念治疗的随机临床试验和匹配的非寻求治疗的社区样本中,15个月的饮酒减少。","authors":"Barbara S McCrady, Katie Witkiewitz, Alicia Shiver, Megan Swartz, Roberta Chávez, Stefan Klimaj, Eric D Claus","doi":"10.1037/ccp0001025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine drinking outcomes over time among two samples recruited and assessed using similar criteria, procedures, and measures: heavy drinkers who were not seeking treatment and treatment seekers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Heavy-drinking participants were recruited for a naturalistic study of the course of alcohol use in a nonhelp-seeking community sample (N = 190) and a randomized clinical trial (N = 110) of 2-4 sessions of motivational enhancement therapy followed by eight sessions of cognitive-behavioral or mindfulness-based treatment. Alcohol use was assessed with the Timeline Followback at baseline and 3-, 9-, and 15-month follow-ups. Percent heavy drinking days was the primary outcome variable; percent drinking days and drinks per drinking day were secondary outcome variables. Propensity score analysis was used to reduce potential effects of confounding, and latent growth curve model with maximum likelihood estimation was used to assess changes in drinking over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the nonhelp-seeking community sample, the clinical sample showed greater reductions in frequency of heavy drinking and of any drinking over the 15 months of follow-up. There were no differences between treatment conditions on any outcome variable. The clinical and community samples both decreased their drinking over time with medium to large effect size reductions in the clinical sample and small effect size reductions in the community sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both samples of heavy drinkers reduced their drinking over time, but receiving behavioral treatment was associated with more substantial decreases in drinking frequency and intensity, attaining levels comparable to or below that of a community sample. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"94 8","pages":"482-495"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13523008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fifteen-month drinking reductions in a randomized clinical trial of cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based treatments and a matched nontreatment-seeking community sample.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara S McCrady, Katie Witkiewitz, Alicia Shiver, Megan Swartz, Roberta Chávez, Stefan Klimaj, Eric D Claus\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ccp0001025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine drinking outcomes over time among two samples recruited and assessed using similar criteria, procedures, and measures: heavy drinkers who were not seeking treatment and treatment seekers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Heavy-drinking participants were recruited for a naturalistic study of the course of alcohol use in a nonhelp-seeking community sample (N = 190) and a randomized clinical trial (N = 110) of 2-4 sessions of motivational enhancement therapy followed by eight sessions of cognitive-behavioral or mindfulness-based treatment. Alcohol use was assessed with the Timeline Followback at baseline and 3-, 9-, and 15-month follow-ups. Percent heavy drinking days was the primary outcome variable; percent drinking days and drinks per drinking day were secondary outcome variables. Propensity score analysis was used to reduce potential effects of confounding, and latent growth curve model with maximum likelihood estimation was used to assess changes in drinking over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the nonhelp-seeking community sample, the clinical sample showed greater reductions in frequency of heavy drinking and of any drinking over the 15 months of follow-up. There were no differences between treatment conditions on any outcome variable. The clinical and community samples both decreased their drinking over time with medium to large effect size reductions in the clinical sample and small effect size reductions in the community sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both samples of heavy drinkers reduced their drinking over time, but receiving behavioral treatment was associated with more substantial decreases in drinking frequency and intensity, attaining levels comparable to or below that of a community sample. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology\",\"volume\":\"94 8\",\"pages\":\"482-495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13523008/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0001025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0001025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fifteen-month drinking reductions in a randomized clinical trial of cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based treatments and a matched nontreatment-seeking community sample.
Objective: To examine drinking outcomes over time among two samples recruited and assessed using similar criteria, procedures, and measures: heavy drinkers who were not seeking treatment and treatment seekers.
Method: Heavy-drinking participants were recruited for a naturalistic study of the course of alcohol use in a nonhelp-seeking community sample (N = 190) and a randomized clinical trial (N = 110) of 2-4 sessions of motivational enhancement therapy followed by eight sessions of cognitive-behavioral or mindfulness-based treatment. Alcohol use was assessed with the Timeline Followback at baseline and 3-, 9-, and 15-month follow-ups. Percent heavy drinking days was the primary outcome variable; percent drinking days and drinks per drinking day were secondary outcome variables. Propensity score analysis was used to reduce potential effects of confounding, and latent growth curve model with maximum likelihood estimation was used to assess changes in drinking over time.
Results: Compared with the nonhelp-seeking community sample, the clinical sample showed greater reductions in frequency of heavy drinking and of any drinking over the 15 months of follow-up. There were no differences between treatment conditions on any outcome variable. The clinical and community samples both decreased their drinking over time with medium to large effect size reductions in the clinical sample and small effect size reductions in the community sample.
Conclusions: Both samples of heavy drinkers reduced their drinking over time, but receiving behavioral treatment was associated with more substantial decreases in drinking frequency and intensity, attaining levels comparable to or below that of a community sample. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.