织物对病毒大小颗粒的过滤性能:系统综述。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Nam Xuan Ha, Anh Nguyen, Huynh Ngo Minh Trang, Jeza Muhamad Abdul Aziz, Nacir Dhouibi, Bao-Tran Do Le, Ahmad Altom, Mostafa Atef Amin, Pham Do Thuc Anh, Hadeir Said, Venkata Vasavi Vadduri, Dao Ngoc Hien Tam, Satoko Okubayashi, Abdelrahman M Makram, Nguyen Tien Huy
{"title":"织物对病毒大小颗粒的过滤性能:系统综述。","authors":"Nam Xuan Ha, Anh Nguyen, Huynh Ngo Minh Trang, Jeza Muhamad Abdul Aziz, Nacir Dhouibi, Bao-Tran Do Le, Ahmad Altom, Mostafa Atef Amin, Pham Do Thuc Anh, Hadeir Said, Venkata Vasavi Vadduri, Dao Ngoc Hien Tam, Satoko Okubayashi, Abdelrahman M Makram, Nguyen Tien Huy","doi":"10.1186/s12879-026-14275-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Wearing a mask is part of the comprehensive strategy to suppress transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and respiratory tract infections. Despite available COVID-19 vaccines, wearing a mask has remained one of the simplest and most effective ways. There was, however, little data available regarding the filtration of fabrics in masks against infectious aerosols or particles of viral size. This study reviewed the filtration performance of fabrics against virus-sized particles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. The literature search started with seven electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Institute of Science Index, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SciFinder) and two preprints, then manual search. Quality assessment was performed on all included studies using an adaptive tool for in vitro studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies were finally included. Cotton was most commonly investigated, followed by polymers and nanofibers. A study reported filtration performance as droplet blocking efficiency (%), and materials with the highest blocking efficiency comprised polypropylene (99.7 [95.2-99.9]), cotton (98.9 [96.8-99.8]), silk (98.7 [81.1-99.8]), and polyester/polyamide (98.2 [90-99.8]). Other studies reported filtration efficiency (%). Fabrics showing highest filtration efficiency were polymers (polypropylene, polyethylene, spunbond/meltblown/spunbond) (100, 94.4, 93.9, respectively), nanofibers (nanofiber-fabric-layered composite, polyvinyl alcohol/nylon-taffeta composite) (99.8 ± 0.24, 97.3, respectively), cotton (cotton/chiffon, cotton quilt, cotton/flannel, cotton/silk) (97 ± 2, 96 ± 2, 95 ± 2, 94 ± 2, respectively). Quality assessment showed that most of the studies were adequate to evaluate the filtration performance against aerosol or virus particles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Some fabrics showed effectiveness in protective applications for respiratory infections; particularly nanofibers and polymers were promising materials for specialized masks or respirators.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13508351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The filtration performance of fabrics against particles of viral size: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Nam Xuan Ha, Anh Nguyen, Huynh Ngo Minh Trang, Jeza Muhamad Abdul Aziz, Nacir Dhouibi, Bao-Tran Do Le, Ahmad Altom, Mostafa Atef Amin, Pham Do Thuc Anh, Hadeir Said, Venkata Vasavi Vadduri, Dao Ngoc Hien Tam, Satoko Okubayashi, Abdelrahman M Makram, Nguyen Tien Huy\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12879-026-14275-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Wearing a mask is part of the comprehensive strategy to suppress transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and respiratory tract infections. Despite available COVID-19 vaccines, wearing a mask has remained one of the simplest and most effective ways. There was, however, little data available regarding the filtration of fabrics in masks against infectious aerosols or particles of viral size. This study reviewed the filtration performance of fabrics against virus-sized particles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. The literature search started with seven electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Institute of Science Index, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SciFinder) and two preprints, then manual search. Quality assessment was performed on all included studies using an adaptive tool for in vitro studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies were finally included. Cotton was most commonly investigated, followed by polymers and nanofibers. A study reported filtration performance as droplet blocking efficiency (%), and materials with the highest blocking efficiency comprised polypropylene (99.7 [95.2-99.9]), cotton (98.9 [96.8-99.8]), silk (98.7 [81.1-99.8]), and polyester/polyamide (98.2 [90-99.8]). Other studies reported filtration efficiency (%). Fabrics showing highest filtration efficiency were polymers (polypropylene, polyethylene, spunbond/meltblown/spunbond) (100, 94.4, 93.9, respectively), nanofibers (nanofiber-fabric-layered composite, polyvinyl alcohol/nylon-taffeta composite) (99.8 ± 0.24, 97.3, respectively), cotton (cotton/chiffon, cotton quilt, cotton/flannel, cotton/silk) (97 ± 2, 96 ± 2, 95 ± 2, 94 ± 2, respectively). Quality assessment showed that most of the studies were adequate to evaluate the filtration performance against aerosol or virus particles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Some fabrics showed effectiveness in protective applications for respiratory infections; particularly nanofibers and polymers were promising materials for specialized masks or respirators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13508351/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-026-14275-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-026-14275-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:佩戴口罩是遏制新冠病毒传播和呼吸道感染综合策略的一部分。尽管有COVID-19疫苗,但戴口罩仍然是最简单、最有效的方法之一。然而,关于口罩织物过滤传染性气溶胶或病毒大小颗粒的数据很少。本研究综述了织物对病毒大小颗粒的过滤性能。方法:按照PRISMA 2020标准进行系统评价。文献检索从7个电子数据库(PubMed、谷歌Scholar、Scopus、Institute of Science Index、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、SciFinder)和2个预印本开始,然后进行人工检索。使用体外研究的适应性工具对所有纳入的研究进行质量评估。结果:最终纳入18项研究。研究最多的是棉花,其次是聚合物和纳米纤维。一项研究报告了过滤性能为液滴阻挡效率(%),最高阻挡效率的材料包括聚丙烯(99.7[95.2-99.9])、棉花(98.9[96.8-99.8])、丝绸(98.7[81.1-99.8])和聚酯/聚酰胺(98.2[90-99.8])。其他研究报告了过滤效率(%)。过滤效率最高的织物为高聚物(聚丙烯、聚乙烯、纺粘/熔喷/纺粘)(分别为100、94.4、93.9)、纳米纤维(纳米纤维-织物分层复合、聚乙烯醇/尼龙-塔夫绸复合)(分别为99.8±0.24、97.3)、棉(棉/雪纺、棉被、棉/法兰绒、棉/丝)(分别为97±2、96±2、95±2、94±2)。质量评价表明,大多数研究足以评价对气溶胶或病毒颗粒的过滤性能。结论:部分织物具有良好的呼吸道感染防护效果;特别是纳米纤维和聚合物是制造专用口罩或呼吸器的有前途的材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The filtration performance of fabrics against particles of viral size: a systematic review.

Introduction: Wearing a mask is part of the comprehensive strategy to suppress transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and respiratory tract infections. Despite available COVID-19 vaccines, wearing a mask has remained one of the simplest and most effective ways. There was, however, little data available regarding the filtration of fabrics in masks against infectious aerosols or particles of viral size. This study reviewed the filtration performance of fabrics against virus-sized particles.

Methods: The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. The literature search started with seven electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Institute of Science Index, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SciFinder) and two preprints, then manual search. Quality assessment was performed on all included studies using an adaptive tool for in vitro studies.

Results: Eighteen studies were finally included. Cotton was most commonly investigated, followed by polymers and nanofibers. A study reported filtration performance as droplet blocking efficiency (%), and materials with the highest blocking efficiency comprised polypropylene (99.7 [95.2-99.9]), cotton (98.9 [96.8-99.8]), silk (98.7 [81.1-99.8]), and polyester/polyamide (98.2 [90-99.8]). Other studies reported filtration efficiency (%). Fabrics showing highest filtration efficiency were polymers (polypropylene, polyethylene, spunbond/meltblown/spunbond) (100, 94.4, 93.9, respectively), nanofibers (nanofiber-fabric-layered composite, polyvinyl alcohol/nylon-taffeta composite) (99.8 ± 0.24, 97.3, respectively), cotton (cotton/chiffon, cotton quilt, cotton/flannel, cotton/silk) (97 ± 2, 96 ± 2, 95 ± 2, 94 ± 2, respectively). Quality assessment showed that most of the studies were adequate to evaluate the filtration performance against aerosol or virus particles.

Conclusion: Some fabrics showed effectiveness in protective applications for respiratory infections; particularly nanofibers and polymers were promising materials for specialized masks or respirators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书