基于触摸的干预,生物场疗法和催眠的疼痛管理:在物理治疗补充方法的范围审查。

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2026-08-06 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpain.2026.1869699
Francesco Bonanno, Clemente Cedro, Angelo Alito, Demetrio Milardi, Vincenzo Rizzo, Carmela Mento, Clara Lombardo
{"title":"基于触摸的干预,生物场疗法和催眠的疼痛管理:在物理治疗补充方法的范围审查。","authors":"Francesco Bonanno, Clemente Cedro, Angelo Alito, Demetrio Milardi, Vincenzo Rizzo, Carmela Mento, Clara Lombardo","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2026.1869699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is a complex and multidimensional experience shaped by biological, psychological, and contextual factors. Complementary approaches, including hypnosis-based interventions, touch-based interventions, and biofield therapies, are increasingly explored in physiotherapy and rehabilitation as non-pharmacological strategies for pain management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to synthesize current evidence on the clinical applications, reported outcomes, and proposed mechanisms of hypnosis-based interventions, touch-based interventions, and biofield therapies in the management of pain and related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs published in English between 2004 and December 2025. Databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 1,001 patients with conditions such as fibromyalgia, chronic widespread pain, temporomandibular disorders, knee osteoarthritis, and chronic back pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, hypnotherapy was associated with consistent reductions in pain intensity and improvements in psychological outcomes, including anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, and sleep quality. Several studies reported that these improvements were maintained at medium- and long-term follow-ups. Touch-based interventions and biofield therapies were associated with potential improvements in pain-related outcomes and, in some studies, physical function. Some combined approaches integrating hypnosis-based interventions, touch-based interventions, or biofield therapies with conventional treatments were associated with greater improvements than standard care alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite encouraging findings, methodological heterogeneity and variable study quality limit definitive conclusions. Hypnosis-based interventions, touch-based interventions, and biofield therapies may represent complementary approaches to pain management and rehabilitation; however, the available safety and effectiveness evidence remains preliminary.</p>","PeriodicalId":73097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"7 ","pages":"1869699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13490130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Touch-based interventions, biofield therapies, and hypnosis for pain management: a scoping review of complementary approaches in physiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Bonanno, Clemente Cedro, Angelo Alito, Demetrio Milardi, Vincenzo Rizzo, Carmela Mento, Clara Lombardo\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fpain.2026.1869699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is a complex and multidimensional experience shaped by biological, psychological, and contextual factors. Complementary approaches, including hypnosis-based interventions, touch-based interventions, and biofield therapies, are increasingly explored in physiotherapy and rehabilitation as non-pharmacological strategies for pain management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to synthesize current evidence on the clinical applications, reported outcomes, and proposed mechanisms of hypnosis-based interventions, touch-based interventions, and biofield therapies in the management of pain and related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs published in English between 2004 and December 2025. Databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 1,001 patients with conditions such as fibromyalgia, chronic widespread pain, temporomandibular disorders, knee osteoarthritis, and chronic back pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, hypnotherapy was associated with consistent reductions in pain intensity and improvements in psychological outcomes, including anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, and sleep quality. Several studies reported that these improvements were maintained at medium- and long-term follow-ups. Touch-based interventions and biofield therapies were associated with potential improvements in pain-related outcomes and, in some studies, physical function. Some combined approaches integrating hypnosis-based interventions, touch-based interventions, or biofield therapies with conventional treatments were associated with greater improvements than standard care alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite encouraging findings, methodological heterogeneity and variable study quality limit definitive conclusions. Hypnosis-based interventions, touch-based interventions, and biofield therapies may represent complementary approaches to pain management and rehabilitation; however, the available safety and effectiveness evidence remains preliminary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1869699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13490130/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2026.1869699\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2026.1869699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疼痛是一种复杂的多维体验,受生物、心理和环境因素的影响。辅助方法,包括基于催眠的干预,基于触摸的干预和生物场疗法,越来越多地在物理治疗和康复中作为疼痛管理的非药物策略进行探索。目的:本综述旨在综合目前基于催眠的干预、基于触摸的干预和生物场治疗在疼痛和相关结果管理中的临床应用、报告结果和建议机制的证据。方法:该综述遵循PRISMA-ScR指南,纳入2004年至2025年12月期间发表的英文随机对照试验(rct)和非rct。检索的数据库为PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane Library。14项研究符合纳入标准,涉及1001名患有纤维肌痛、慢性广泛性疼痛、颞下颌紊乱、膝关节骨关节炎和慢性背痛等疾病的患者。结果:总体而言,催眠疗法与疼痛强度的持续降低和心理结果的改善有关,包括焦虑、抑郁、灾难和睡眠质量。几项研究报告说,这些改善在中期和长期随访中保持不变。基于触摸的干预和生物场治疗与疼痛相关结果的潜在改善有关,在一些研究中,还与身体功能有关。一些结合催眠干预、触摸干预或生物场治疗与常规治疗的联合方法比单独的标准治疗有更大的改善。结论:尽管研究结果令人鼓舞,但方法学的异质性和研究质量的可变限制了明确的结论。基于催眠的干预、基于触摸的干预和生物场疗法可能是疼痛管理和康复的补充方法;然而,现有的安全性和有效性证据仍处于初步阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Touch-based interventions, biofield therapies, and hypnosis for pain management: a scoping review of complementary approaches in physiotherapy.

Background: Pain is a complex and multidimensional experience shaped by biological, psychological, and contextual factors. Complementary approaches, including hypnosis-based interventions, touch-based interventions, and biofield therapies, are increasingly explored in physiotherapy and rehabilitation as non-pharmacological strategies for pain management.

Objective: This scoping review aimed to synthesize current evidence on the clinical applications, reported outcomes, and proposed mechanisms of hypnosis-based interventions, touch-based interventions, and biofield therapies in the management of pain and related outcomes.

Methods: The review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs published in English between 2004 and December 2025. Databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 1,001 patients with conditions such as fibromyalgia, chronic widespread pain, temporomandibular disorders, knee osteoarthritis, and chronic back pain.

Results: Overall, hypnotherapy was associated with consistent reductions in pain intensity and improvements in psychological outcomes, including anxiety, depression, catastrophizing, and sleep quality. Several studies reported that these improvements were maintained at medium- and long-term follow-ups. Touch-based interventions and biofield therapies were associated with potential improvements in pain-related outcomes and, in some studies, physical function. Some combined approaches integrating hypnosis-based interventions, touch-based interventions, or biofield therapies with conventional treatments were associated with greater improvements than standard care alone.

Conclusions: Despite encouraging findings, methodological heterogeneity and variable study quality limit definitive conclusions. Hypnosis-based interventions, touch-based interventions, and biofield therapies may represent complementary approaches to pain management and rehabilitation; however, the available safety and effectiveness evidence remains preliminary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书