{"title":"腰椎管狭窄症患者Dubousset功能试验的心理测量特性","authors":"Tuba Unver, Bayram Unver, Kevser Sevik Kacmaz","doi":"10.1155/ane/3286680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) may deteriorate the spinal structure and mobility, leading to various problems, including pain, fatigue, decreased physical function, gait and balance issues, and diminished quality of life. The Dubousset Functional Test (DFT) comprehensively evaluates the functional capacity of the spinopelvic muscle groups, gait, balance, and dual-tasking performance. This study evaluates the reliability and validity of the DFT in patients with LSS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The DFT was performed twice per day at 1-h intervals in 30 patients with LSS. Before and after the tests, the patient′s pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [2,1]), Bland–Altman analysis, standard error of measurement (SEM95), and smallest detectable change (SDC95) were calculated at a 95% confidence level to determine interrater reliability. Concurrent validity was examined using the five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5R-STS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean age of the patients was 55.0 ± 9.4 years, and the DFT score was 47.6 ± 3.3 s. The DFT has an acceptable reliability point estimate (ICC: 0.65–0.87). The DFT total score showed moderate correlations with the 5R-STS (<i>r</i> = 0.50) and ODI (<i>r</i> = 0.46), providing limited evidence of concurrent validity for lower-extremity functional performance and self-reported disability. The SEM95 was 2.46, and the SDC95 was 6.84. No increased pain or side effects were observed due to the DFT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The DFT demonstrated acceptable reliability under the repeated-trial conditions used in this study, although the precision of the total-score reliability estimate was limited. The DFT showed preliminary concurrent validity in relation to sit-to-stand performance and self-reported disability in patients with LSS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ane/3286680","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Psychometric Properties of the Dubousset Functional Test in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis\",\"authors\":\"Tuba Unver, Bayram Unver, Kevser Sevik Kacmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ane/3286680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) may deteriorate the spinal structure and mobility, leading to various problems, including pain, fatigue, decreased physical function, gait and balance issues, and diminished quality of life. The Dubousset Functional Test (DFT) comprehensively evaluates the functional capacity of the spinopelvic muscle groups, gait, balance, and dual-tasking performance. This study evaluates the reliability and validity of the DFT in patients with LSS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The DFT was performed twice per day at 1-h intervals in 30 patients with LSS. Before and after the tests, the patient′s pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [2,1]), Bland–Altman analysis, standard error of measurement (SEM95), and smallest detectable change (SDC95) were calculated at a 95% confidence level to determine interrater reliability. Concurrent validity was examined using the five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5R-STS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The mean age of the patients was 55.0 ± 9.4 years, and the DFT score was 47.6 ± 3.3 s. The DFT has an acceptable reliability point estimate (ICC: 0.65–0.87). The DFT total score showed moderate correlations with the 5R-STS (<i>r</i> = 0.50) and ODI (<i>r</i> = 0.46), providing limited evidence of concurrent validity for lower-extremity functional performance and self-reported disability. The SEM95 was 2.46, and the SDC95 was 6.84. No increased pain or side effects were observed due to the DFT.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The DFT demonstrated acceptable reliability under the repeated-trial conditions used in this study, although the precision of the total-score reliability estimate was limited. The DFT showed preliminary concurrent validity in relation to sit-to-stand performance and self-reported disability in patients with LSS.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"2026 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ane/3286680\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ane/3286680\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ane/3286680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Psychometric Properties of the Dubousset Functional Test in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Background
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) may deteriorate the spinal structure and mobility, leading to various problems, including pain, fatigue, decreased physical function, gait and balance issues, and diminished quality of life. The Dubousset Functional Test (DFT) comprehensively evaluates the functional capacity of the spinopelvic muscle groups, gait, balance, and dual-tasking performance. This study evaluates the reliability and validity of the DFT in patients with LSS.
Methods
The DFT was performed twice per day at 1-h intervals in 30 patients with LSS. Before and after the tests, the patient′s pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [2,1]), Bland–Altman analysis, standard error of measurement (SEM95), and smallest detectable change (SDC95) were calculated at a 95% confidence level to determine interrater reliability. Concurrent validity was examined using the five-repetition sit-to-stand test (5R-STS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
Results
The mean age of the patients was 55.0 ± 9.4 years, and the DFT score was 47.6 ± 3.3 s. The DFT has an acceptable reliability point estimate (ICC: 0.65–0.87). The DFT total score showed moderate correlations with the 5R-STS (r = 0.50) and ODI (r = 0.46), providing limited evidence of concurrent validity for lower-extremity functional performance and self-reported disability. The SEM95 was 2.46, and the SDC95 was 6.84. No increased pain or side effects were observed due to the DFT.
Conclusion
The DFT demonstrated acceptable reliability under the repeated-trial conditions used in this study, although the precision of the total-score reliability estimate was limited. The DFT showed preliminary concurrent validity in relation to sit-to-stand performance and self-reported disability in patients with LSS.
期刊介绍:
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.