{"title":"档案守护者与解冻后苏联电影中的战争记忆","authors":"Violeta Davoliūtė","doi":"10.1177/16118944261463977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article identifies a sub-genre of the Soviet war film: a quartet of feature films released between 1964 and 1967 ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Enemy of the State</jats:italic> , <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I Want to Believe</jats:italic> , <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Someone Else</jats:italic> ' <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">s Name</jats:italic> , and <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">Dissenting Opinion</jats:italic> ) that centre on unmasking former Nazi collaborators. Produced in the USSR's western borderlands during the pivotal transition from the Khrushchev Thaw to Brezhnev-era conservatism, these films served as a cultural arena for negotiating the memory of the Great Patriotic War. They introduce a new cinematic hero: the investigator as a guardian of the archive. This figure – whether a male KGB officer, journalist, or prosecutor – embodies the post-Stalinist security apparatus's methodological shift from crude terror towards more sophisticated, prophylactic modes of social control. Using sincerity and forensic reason as strategic tools, these protagonists reinforce the state's authority as the ultimate arbiter of historical truth. The analysis traces how this archetype evolves across the four films, from an infallible state avenger to a professional who corrects bureaucratic errors and ensures that historical justice prevails. While these films helped inaugurate the Brezhnevite cult of victory, they simultaneously reveal the very anxieties they sought to quell regarding flawed archives, state fallibility and the unresolved legacy of wartime collaboration.","PeriodicalId":44275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern European History","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guardians of the Archive and the Memory of War in Soviet Films After the Thaw\",\"authors\":\"Violeta Davoliūtė\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/16118944261463977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article identifies a sub-genre of the Soviet war film: a quartet of feature films released between 1964 and 1967 ( <jats:italic toggle=\\\"yes\\\">Enemy of the State</jats:italic> , <jats:italic toggle=\\\"yes\\\">I Want to Believe</jats:italic> , <jats:italic toggle=\\\"yes\\\">Someone Else</jats:italic> ' <jats:italic toggle=\\\"yes\\\">s Name</jats:italic> , and <jats:italic toggle=\\\"yes\\\">Dissenting Opinion</jats:italic> ) that centre on unmasking former Nazi collaborators. Produced in the USSR's western borderlands during the pivotal transition from the Khrushchev Thaw to Brezhnev-era conservatism, these films served as a cultural arena for negotiating the memory of the Great Patriotic War. They introduce a new cinematic hero: the investigator as a guardian of the archive. This figure – whether a male KGB officer, journalist, or prosecutor – embodies the post-Stalinist security apparatus's methodological shift from crude terror towards more sophisticated, prophylactic modes of social control. Using sincerity and forensic reason as strategic tools, these protagonists reinforce the state's authority as the ultimate arbiter of historical truth. The analysis traces how this archetype evolves across the four films, from an infallible state avenger to a professional who corrects bureaucratic errors and ensures that historical justice prevails. While these films helped inaugurate the Brezhnevite cult of victory, they simultaneously reveal the very anxieties they sought to quell regarding flawed archives, state fallibility and the unresolved legacy of wartime collaboration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern European History\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern European History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944261463977\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern European History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16118944261463977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Guardians of the Archive and the Memory of War in Soviet Films After the Thaw
This article identifies a sub-genre of the Soviet war film: a quartet of feature films released between 1964 and 1967 ( Enemy of the State , I Want to Believe , Someone Else ' s Name , and Dissenting Opinion ) that centre on unmasking former Nazi collaborators. Produced in the USSR's western borderlands during the pivotal transition from the Khrushchev Thaw to Brezhnev-era conservatism, these films served as a cultural arena for negotiating the memory of the Great Patriotic War. They introduce a new cinematic hero: the investigator as a guardian of the archive. This figure – whether a male KGB officer, journalist, or prosecutor – embodies the post-Stalinist security apparatus's methodological shift from crude terror towards more sophisticated, prophylactic modes of social control. Using sincerity and forensic reason as strategic tools, these protagonists reinforce the state's authority as the ultimate arbiter of historical truth. The analysis traces how this archetype evolves across the four films, from an infallible state avenger to a professional who corrects bureaucratic errors and ensures that historical justice prevails. While these films helped inaugurate the Brezhnevite cult of victory, they simultaneously reveal the very anxieties they sought to quell regarding flawed archives, state fallibility and the unresolved legacy of wartime collaboration.