Huanlong Li, Junjie Yang, Xingguo Han, Yunhai Zhang, Ilia J. Leitch, Andrew R. Leitch, Josep Peñuelas, Jordi Sardans, Haiyang Zhang, Dong Cao, Fangyuan Zhao, Man Chen, Yong Jiang, Yang Yang, Qingmin Pan, Yann Hautier, Cunzheng Wei
{"title":"氮富集和刈割下基因组大小驱动的草地生产力和物种组成变化","authors":"Huanlong Li, Junjie Yang, Xingguo Han, Yunhai Zhang, Ilia J. Leitch, Andrew R. Leitch, Josep Peñuelas, Jordi Sardans, Haiyang Zhang, Dong Cao, Fangyuan Zhao, Man Chen, Yong Jiang, Yang Yang, Qingmin Pan, Yann Hautier, Cunzheng Wei","doi":"10.1002/ecm.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grasslands underpin critical ecosystem services, yet their biodiversity and functioning are increasingly threatened by nitrogen (N) deposition and influenced by biomass removal through mowing to provide fodder. Trait-based approaches have advanced our understanding of plant responses, but many commonly used traits are plastic and context-dependent, limiting their predictive power. Here, we propose that plant genome size (GS), a relatively stable genetic character between individuals of a species, offers predictive power through nucleotypic constraints that are hypothesized to influence plant nutrient use, growth dynamics, and competitive strategies. By utilizing a large dataset of aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) from an N addition and mowing field experiment over 15 years, we showed that GS–N interactions caused a selective stimulation of large-GS species under N enrichment, but only when N addition treatment exceeded a saturation threshold of 15 g N m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>. Conversely, low levels of N addition preferentially enhanced ANPP of small-GS plants. These divergent responses between two genomic groups, pivoting at the N saturation threshold, could be ascribed to a shift from competition for N to competition for light, as N availability increases. Meanwhile, biomass removal by mowing delayed the impact of this threshold by selectively benefiting small-GS species and disadvantaging large-GS species. This response could be due to the increased amount of canopy light penetration following biomass removal favoring small-GS species even under higher N availabilities. Additionally, large-GS species showed greater sensitivity of ANPP to interannual fluctuations in temperature and precipitation compared to small-GS species. The climate sensitivity of large-GS species was further amplified with increasing N treatment, reflecting a pervasive large genome constraint among grassland plants. Our findings pinpoint the co-regulation of GS, nutrients, and climate on plant growth, providing evidence that GS is a predictive character for ANPP change trajectories and community dynamics under the combined influence of global changes and management scheme shifts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"96 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genome size-driven shifts in grassland productivity and species composition under nitrogen enrichment and mowing\",\"authors\":\"Huanlong Li, Junjie Yang, Xingguo Han, Yunhai Zhang, Ilia J. Leitch, Andrew R. Leitch, Josep Peñuelas, Jordi Sardans, Haiyang Zhang, Dong Cao, Fangyuan Zhao, Man Chen, Yong Jiang, Yang Yang, Qingmin Pan, Yann Hautier, Cunzheng Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecm.70075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Grasslands underpin critical ecosystem services, yet their biodiversity and functioning are increasingly threatened by nitrogen (N) deposition and influenced by biomass removal through mowing to provide fodder. Trait-based approaches have advanced our understanding of plant responses, but many commonly used traits are plastic and context-dependent, limiting their predictive power. Here, we propose that plant genome size (GS), a relatively stable genetic character between individuals of a species, offers predictive power through nucleotypic constraints that are hypothesized to influence plant nutrient use, growth dynamics, and competitive strategies. By utilizing a large dataset of aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) from an N addition and mowing field experiment over 15 years, we showed that GS–N interactions caused a selective stimulation of large-GS species under N enrichment, but only when N addition treatment exceeded a saturation threshold of 15 g N m<sup>−2</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>. Conversely, low levels of N addition preferentially enhanced ANPP of small-GS plants. These divergent responses between two genomic groups, pivoting at the N saturation threshold, could be ascribed to a shift from competition for N to competition for light, as N availability increases. Meanwhile, biomass removal by mowing delayed the impact of this threshold by selectively benefiting small-GS species and disadvantaging large-GS species. This response could be due to the increased amount of canopy light penetration following biomass removal favoring small-GS species even under higher N availabilities. Additionally, large-GS species showed greater sensitivity of ANPP to interannual fluctuations in temperature and precipitation compared to small-GS species. The climate sensitivity of large-GS species was further amplified with increasing N treatment, reflecting a pervasive large genome constraint among grassland plants. Our findings pinpoint the co-regulation of GS, nutrients, and climate on plant growth, providing evidence that GS is a predictive character for ANPP change trajectories and community dynamics under the combined influence of global changes and management scheme shifts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Monographs\",\"volume\":\"96 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.70075\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.70075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
草原支撑着关键的生态系统服务,但其生物多样性和功能日益受到氮沉降的威胁,并受到通过割草提供饲料而去除生物质的影响。基于性状的方法提高了我们对植物反应的理解,但许多常用性状是可塑的和依赖于环境的,限制了它们的预测能力。在这里,我们提出植物基因组大小(GS),一个物种个体之间相对稳定的遗传特征,通过核型约束提供预测能力,假设影响植物营养利用,生长动态和竞争策略。通过利用15年氮肥和刈割田间试验的大型地上净初级生产力(ANPP)数据,研究人员发现,在氮富集条件下,GS-N相互作用会对大gs物种产生选择性刺激,但只有在氮肥处理超过15 g N m−2年−1的饱和阈值时才会发生。相反,低施氮水平优先提高小gs植株的ANPP。两个基因组组之间的这些不同反应,在氮饱和阈值处发生旋转,可以归因于随着氮的可用性增加,从对氮的竞争向对光的竞争的转变。同时,刈割生物量去除选择性地有利于小gs物种,不利于大gs物种,从而推迟了这一阈值的影响。这种响应可能是由于生物量去除后的冠层透光量增加,即使在高氮有效性下也有利于小gs物种。此外,与小gs种相比,大gs种的ANPP对温度和降水的年际波动表现出更大的敏感性。随着氮处理的增加,大gs物种的气候敏感性进一步增强,反映了草原植物普遍存在大基因组约束。我们的研究结果明确了GS、养分和气候对植物生长的共同调节,为全球变化和管理方案转变共同影响下的ANPP变化轨迹和群落动态提供了证据。
Genome size-driven shifts in grassland productivity and species composition under nitrogen enrichment and mowing
Grasslands underpin critical ecosystem services, yet their biodiversity and functioning are increasingly threatened by nitrogen (N) deposition and influenced by biomass removal through mowing to provide fodder. Trait-based approaches have advanced our understanding of plant responses, but many commonly used traits are plastic and context-dependent, limiting their predictive power. Here, we propose that plant genome size (GS), a relatively stable genetic character between individuals of a species, offers predictive power through nucleotypic constraints that are hypothesized to influence plant nutrient use, growth dynamics, and competitive strategies. By utilizing a large dataset of aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) from an N addition and mowing field experiment over 15 years, we showed that GS–N interactions caused a selective stimulation of large-GS species under N enrichment, but only when N addition treatment exceeded a saturation threshold of 15 g N m−2 year−1. Conversely, low levels of N addition preferentially enhanced ANPP of small-GS plants. These divergent responses between two genomic groups, pivoting at the N saturation threshold, could be ascribed to a shift from competition for N to competition for light, as N availability increases. Meanwhile, biomass removal by mowing delayed the impact of this threshold by selectively benefiting small-GS species and disadvantaging large-GS species. This response could be due to the increased amount of canopy light penetration following biomass removal favoring small-GS species even under higher N availabilities. Additionally, large-GS species showed greater sensitivity of ANPP to interannual fluctuations in temperature and precipitation compared to small-GS species. The climate sensitivity of large-GS species was further amplified with increasing N treatment, reflecting a pervasive large genome constraint among grassland plants. Our findings pinpoint the co-regulation of GS, nutrients, and climate on plant growth, providing evidence that GS is a predictive character for ANPP change trajectories and community dynamics under the combined influence of global changes and management scheme shifts.
期刊介绍:
The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology.
Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message.
Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology.
Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions.
In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.