{"title":"创造性问题解决中协作与问题建构的协同效应:三人小组协作与个人协作的实验研究","authors":"You Takatsu, Takayuki Goto, Roni Reiter-Palmon","doi":"10.1002/jocb.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined whether the effects of problem construction on creative problem-solving differed between individuals and groups. A 2 (collaboration: individual vs. three-person group) × 2 (problem construction: present vs. absent) between-participants experiment was conducted on 175 university students who solved an ill-defined problem. We assessed creative outcomes (solution originality and usefulness) and process measures (fluency and flexibility of problem restatements and ideas). The results revealed that problem construction did not enhance the originality or usefulness of final solutions. However, this increased the number and diversity of generated ideas, particularly in groups. Groups engaging in problem construction produced more problem restatements than individuals. Furthermore, mediation analysis indicated that part of the group advantage in idea fluency was explained by their greater production of problem restatements. These findings suggest that problem construction in groups activates more diverse problem representations, which stimulate idea generation. Overall, collaboration and problem construction synergistically boosted idea productivity but did not improve the creativity of final solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jocb.70131","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic Effects of Collaboration and Problem Construction in Creative Problem-Solving: An Experimental Study Comparing Collaborative Work in Three-Person Groups With Individual Work\",\"authors\":\"You Takatsu, Takayuki Goto, Roni Reiter-Palmon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jocb.70131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study examined whether the effects of problem construction on creative problem-solving differed between individuals and groups. A 2 (collaboration: individual vs. three-person group) × 2 (problem construction: present vs. absent) between-participants experiment was conducted on 175 university students who solved an ill-defined problem. We assessed creative outcomes (solution originality and usefulness) and process measures (fluency and flexibility of problem restatements and ideas). The results revealed that problem construction did not enhance the originality or usefulness of final solutions. However, this increased the number and diversity of generated ideas, particularly in groups. Groups engaging in problem construction produced more problem restatements than individuals. Furthermore, mediation analysis indicated that part of the group advantage in idea fluency was explained by their greater production of problem restatements. These findings suggest that problem construction in groups activates more diverse problem representations, which stimulate idea generation. Overall, collaboration and problem construction synergistically boosted idea productivity but did not improve the creativity of final solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Creative Behavior\",\"volume\":\"60 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jocb.70131\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Creative Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.70131\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.70131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Synergistic Effects of Collaboration and Problem Construction in Creative Problem-Solving: An Experimental Study Comparing Collaborative Work in Three-Person Groups With Individual Work
This study examined whether the effects of problem construction on creative problem-solving differed between individuals and groups. A 2 (collaboration: individual vs. three-person group) × 2 (problem construction: present vs. absent) between-participants experiment was conducted on 175 university students who solved an ill-defined problem. We assessed creative outcomes (solution originality and usefulness) and process measures (fluency and flexibility of problem restatements and ideas). The results revealed that problem construction did not enhance the originality or usefulness of final solutions. However, this increased the number and diversity of generated ideas, particularly in groups. Groups engaging in problem construction produced more problem restatements than individuals. Furthermore, mediation analysis indicated that part of the group advantage in idea fluency was explained by their greater production of problem restatements. These findings suggest that problem construction in groups activates more diverse problem representations, which stimulate idea generation. Overall, collaboration and problem construction synergistically boosted idea productivity but did not improve the creativity of final solutions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.