Ellen Dymit, Kelsey Griffin, Ethan Morton, Julie Hower, Taal Levi
{"title":"阿拉斯加三个海湾国家公园中猞猁和土狼的比较觅食生态","authors":"Ellen Dymit, Kelsey Griffin, Ethan Morton, Julie Hower, Taal Levi","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Consumers exhibit varying degrees of dietary specialization, with foraging strategies shaped by both evolutionary history and local food availability. In boreal systems, Canada lynx are considered snowshoe hare specialists, whereas coyotes are classically generalist foragers capable of exploiting diverse resources. At the western periphery of the lynx's range in southwestern Alaska, these species co-occur across a mosaic of coastal and interior habitats that differ in prey community composition and landscape structure. We used fecal DNA metabarcoding to characterize and compare the diets of lynx and coyotes in three national parks containing both coastal and interior habitats. We quantified dietary diversity and feeding niche overlap to assess how habitat type influences foraging ecology, interspecific niche partitioning, and species occurrence. Lynx diets were consistently dominated by snowshoe hare, particularly in interior forests, but coastal lynx exhibited niche expansion to consume a wider variety of alternate prey including birds, rodents, and larger mammals, though notably not marine resources. Coyote diets were more diverse overall and included marine-associated prey in coastal areas. Coastal coyotes had the broadest dietary niche, with 55 unique prey taxa and the highest Shannon diversity (<i>H</i>′ = 3.14). Dietary overlap between lynx and coyotes was high in the interior (Pianka's <i>O</i> = 0.86) but lower in coastal habitats (<i>O</i> = 0.51), suggesting increased niche partitioning in coastal regions due to the higher diversity of available prey. These patterns are consistent with the facultative specialist hypothesis and indicate that coastal environments may incite dietary plasticity in both species, particularly in the typically specialized lynx. In addition, we observed highly patchy distributions of both predators in coastal habitats, suggesting that prey availability, dispersal barriers, and carnivore guild structure may constrain coastal occupancy. Our results highlight the importance of prey community structure and habitat context in shaping carnivore foraging strategies, range limits, and interspecific interactions across heterogeneous landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"17 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70733","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative foraging ecology of lynx and coyotes in three Gulf of Alaska national parks\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Dymit, Kelsey Griffin, Ethan Morton, Julie Hower, Taal Levi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.70733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Consumers exhibit varying degrees of dietary specialization, with foraging strategies shaped by both evolutionary history and local food availability. In boreal systems, Canada lynx are considered snowshoe hare specialists, whereas coyotes are classically generalist foragers capable of exploiting diverse resources. At the western periphery of the lynx's range in southwestern Alaska, these species co-occur across a mosaic of coastal and interior habitats that differ in prey community composition and landscape structure. We used fecal DNA metabarcoding to characterize and compare the diets of lynx and coyotes in three national parks containing both coastal and interior habitats. We quantified dietary diversity and feeding niche overlap to assess how habitat type influences foraging ecology, interspecific niche partitioning, and species occurrence. Lynx diets were consistently dominated by snowshoe hare, particularly in interior forests, but coastal lynx exhibited niche expansion to consume a wider variety of alternate prey including birds, rodents, and larger mammals, though notably not marine resources. Coyote diets were more diverse overall and included marine-associated prey in coastal areas. Coastal coyotes had the broadest dietary niche, with 55 unique prey taxa and the highest Shannon diversity (<i>H</i>′ = 3.14). Dietary overlap between lynx and coyotes was high in the interior (Pianka's <i>O</i> = 0.86) but lower in coastal habitats (<i>O</i> = 0.51), suggesting increased niche partitioning in coastal regions due to the higher diversity of available prey. These patterns are consistent with the facultative specialist hypothesis and indicate that coastal environments may incite dietary plasticity in both species, particularly in the typically specialized lynx. In addition, we observed highly patchy distributions of both predators in coastal habitats, suggesting that prey availability, dispersal barriers, and carnivore guild structure may constrain coastal occupancy. Our results highlight the importance of prey community structure and habitat context in shaping carnivore foraging strategies, range limits, and interspecific interactions across heterogeneous landscapes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70733\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70733\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70733","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
消费者表现出不同程度的饮食专业化,其觅食策略受到进化史和当地食物供应的影响。在北方生态系统中,加拿大猞猁被认为是雪鞋兔专家,而土狼则是典型的多面手,能够利用各种资源。在阿拉斯加西南部猞猁活动范围的西部边缘,这些物种共同出现在沿海和内陆栖息地的马赛克上,这些栖息地在猎物群落组成和景观结构上有所不同。我们使用粪便DNA元条形码来描述和比较三个国家公园中包括沿海和内陆栖息地的猞猁和土狼的饮食。我们量化了饮食多样性和摄食生态位重叠,以评估栖息地类型如何影响觅食生态、种间生态位分配和物种发生。猞猁的饮食一直以雪靴兔为主,特别是在内陆森林中,但沿海猞猁表现出生态位扩张,以消耗更多种类的替代猎物,包括鸟类、啮齿动物和大型哺乳动物,尽管值得注意的是没有海洋资源。土狼的饮食总体上更加多样化,包括沿海地区与海洋有关的猎物。沿海土狼的饮食生态位最宽,有55个独特的猎物类群,Shannon多样性最高(H′= 3.14)。内陆地区猞猁和土狼的饮食重叠度较高(Pianka’s O = 0.86),而沿海地区的重叠度较低(O = 0.51),表明沿海地区可利用猎物的多样性较高,从而增加了生态位划分。这些模式与兼性专门性假说一致,表明沿海环境可能会激发这两种物种的饮食可塑性,尤其是典型的专门性猞猁。此外,我们观察到这两种捕食者在沿海栖息地的分布高度不均匀,表明猎物的可用性、扩散障碍和食肉动物公会结构可能限制了沿海的占用。我们的研究结果强调了猎物群落结构和栖息地环境在塑造食肉动物觅食策略、范围限制和异质景观中种间相互作用方面的重要性。
Comparative foraging ecology of lynx and coyotes in three Gulf of Alaska national parks
Consumers exhibit varying degrees of dietary specialization, with foraging strategies shaped by both evolutionary history and local food availability. In boreal systems, Canada lynx are considered snowshoe hare specialists, whereas coyotes are classically generalist foragers capable of exploiting diverse resources. At the western periphery of the lynx's range in southwestern Alaska, these species co-occur across a mosaic of coastal and interior habitats that differ in prey community composition and landscape structure. We used fecal DNA metabarcoding to characterize and compare the diets of lynx and coyotes in three national parks containing both coastal and interior habitats. We quantified dietary diversity and feeding niche overlap to assess how habitat type influences foraging ecology, interspecific niche partitioning, and species occurrence. Lynx diets were consistently dominated by snowshoe hare, particularly in interior forests, but coastal lynx exhibited niche expansion to consume a wider variety of alternate prey including birds, rodents, and larger mammals, though notably not marine resources. Coyote diets were more diverse overall and included marine-associated prey in coastal areas. Coastal coyotes had the broadest dietary niche, with 55 unique prey taxa and the highest Shannon diversity (H′ = 3.14). Dietary overlap between lynx and coyotes was high in the interior (Pianka's O = 0.86) but lower in coastal habitats (O = 0.51), suggesting increased niche partitioning in coastal regions due to the higher diversity of available prey. These patterns are consistent with the facultative specialist hypothesis and indicate that coastal environments may incite dietary plasticity in both species, particularly in the typically specialized lynx. In addition, we observed highly patchy distributions of both predators in coastal habitats, suggesting that prey availability, dispersal barriers, and carnivore guild structure may constrain coastal occupancy. Our results highlight the importance of prey community structure and habitat context in shaping carnivore foraging strategies, range limits, and interspecific interactions across heterogeneous landscapes.
期刊介绍:
The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.