{"title":"当治疗走向在线:取向、经验和感知到的病人开放如何塑造对在线治疗的态度。基于新冠肺炎大流行期间治疗师接受与技术使用统一理论的研究","authors":"Agnieszka Koch, Agata Graczykowska, Szymon Szumiał, Magdalena Marszał-Wiśniewska","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined the key factors associated with psychotherapists' attitudes toward online therapy, with particular focus on therapeutic orientation, age, years of professional experience, prior technological experience, and perceived patient openness. Conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study was based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology for Therapists (UTAUT-T) framework to better understand therapists' acceptance of online therapeutic modalities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The study involved 387 psychotherapists representing various therapeutic approaches, who completed an online self-report questionnaire. The instruments used included the UTAUT-T questionnaire, a custom use behavior questionnaire, and a demographic survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The final sample included 387 psychotherapists. The multivariate test showed significant differences between therapeutic orientations, <i>F</i>(24, 1468) = 3.39, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.05 [0.02, 0.06]. Psychodynamic therapists consistently reported a more negative attitude toward therapy than cognitive-behavioral, systemic, humanistic, or therapists representing other therapeutic orientations. These differences were particularly pronounced for Professional Support (e.g., psychodynamic vs. CBT, <i>t</i> = −7.75, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 1.20[0.86; 1.52]) and for the total UTAUT-T score (e.g., <i>t</i> = −5.48, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.87[0.54; 1.18]). Prior technological experience and perceived patient openness were both positively associated with therapists' attitudes toward online therapy (both <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas age and years of professional experience were not significantly associated with technology acceptance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The study highlights the crucial role of therapeutic orientation, prior experience with technology, and perceived patient openness in shaping therapists' acceptance of online therapy. These results underscore the need for targeted training and support to facilitate the successful integration of digital technologies into routine psychotherapeutic practice. Future research should continue to explore these dynamics under non-crisis conditions to ensure the sustainable development of online therapy services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"82 11","pages":"1886-1896"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Therapy Goes Online: How Orientation, Experience, and Perceived Patient Openness Shape Attitudes Toward Online Therapy. A Study Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology for Therapists During the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Agnieszka Koch, Agata Graczykowska, Szymon Szumiał, Magdalena Marszał-Wiśniewska\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jclp.70208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study examined the key factors associated with psychotherapists' attitudes toward online therapy, with particular focus on therapeutic orientation, age, years of professional experience, prior technological experience, and perceived patient openness. Conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study was based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology for Therapists (UTAUT-T) framework to better understand therapists' acceptance of online therapeutic modalities.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study involved 387 psychotherapists representing various therapeutic approaches, who completed an online self-report questionnaire. The instruments used included the UTAUT-T questionnaire, a custom use behavior questionnaire, and a demographic survey.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The final sample included 387 psychotherapists. The multivariate test showed significant differences between therapeutic orientations, <i>F</i>(24, 1468) = 3.39, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.05 [0.02, 0.06]. Psychodynamic therapists consistently reported a more negative attitude toward therapy than cognitive-behavioral, systemic, humanistic, or therapists representing other therapeutic orientations. These differences were particularly pronounced for Professional Support (e.g., psychodynamic vs. CBT, <i>t</i> = −7.75, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 1.20[0.86; 1.52]) and for the total UTAUT-T score (e.g., <i>t</i> = −5.48, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.87[0.54; 1.18]). Prior technological experience and perceived patient openness were both positively associated with therapists' attitudes toward online therapy (both <i>p</i> < 0.001), whereas age and years of professional experience were not significantly associated with technology acceptance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study highlights the crucial role of therapeutic orientation, prior experience with technology, and perceived patient openness in shaping therapists' acceptance of online therapy. These results underscore the need for targeted training and support to facilitate the successful integration of digital technologies into routine psychotherapeutic practice. Future research should continue to explore these dynamics under non-crisis conditions to ensure the sustainable development of online therapy services.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"82 11\",\"pages\":\"1886-1896\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.70208\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.70208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究探讨了影响心理治疗师对网络治疗态度的关键因素,特别关注治疗取向、年龄、专业经验年数、先前的技术经验和感知到的患者开放程度。该研究在COVID-19大流行期间进行,基于治疗师接受和使用技术的统一理论(UTAUT-T)框架,以更好地了解治疗师对在线治疗方式的接受程度。方法:研究涉及387名代表不同治疗方法的心理治疗师,他们完成了一份在线自我报告问卷。使用的工具包括UTAUT-T问卷、自定义使用行为问卷和人口调查。结果:最终样本包括387名心理治疗师。多因素检验显示治疗取向间差异有统计学意义,F(24,1468) = 3.39, p 2 = 0.05[0.02, 0.06]。与认知行为、系统、人本主义或代表其他治疗取向的治疗师相比,心理动力治疗师一贯报告对治疗的态度更为消极。这些差异在专业支持方面尤为明显(例如,心理动力学与CBT, t = -7.75, p)。结论:该研究强调了治疗取向、先前的技术经验和感知到的患者开放性在塑造治疗师对在线治疗的接受度方面的关键作用。这些结果强调了有针对性的培训和支持的必要性,以促进将数字技术成功整合到常规心理治疗实践中。未来的研究应继续在非危机条件下探索这些动态,以确保在线治疗服务的可持续发展。
When Therapy Goes Online: How Orientation, Experience, and Perceived Patient Openness Shape Attitudes Toward Online Therapy. A Study Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology for Therapists During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Objectives
This study examined the key factors associated with psychotherapists' attitudes toward online therapy, with particular focus on therapeutic orientation, age, years of professional experience, prior technological experience, and perceived patient openness. Conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the study was based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology for Therapists (UTAUT-T) framework to better understand therapists' acceptance of online therapeutic modalities.
Method
The study involved 387 psychotherapists representing various therapeutic approaches, who completed an online self-report questionnaire. The instruments used included the UTAUT-T questionnaire, a custom use behavior questionnaire, and a demographic survey.
Results
The final sample included 387 psychotherapists. The multivariate test showed significant differences between therapeutic orientations, F(24, 1468) = 3.39, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.05 [0.02, 0.06]. Psychodynamic therapists consistently reported a more negative attitude toward therapy than cognitive-behavioral, systemic, humanistic, or therapists representing other therapeutic orientations. These differences were particularly pronounced for Professional Support (e.g., psychodynamic vs. CBT, t = −7.75, p < 0.001, d = 1.20[0.86; 1.52]) and for the total UTAUT-T score (e.g., t = −5.48, p < 0.001, d = 0.87[0.54; 1.18]). Prior technological experience and perceived patient openness were both positively associated with therapists' attitudes toward online therapy (both p < 0.001), whereas age and years of professional experience were not significantly associated with technology acceptance.
Conclusions
The study highlights the crucial role of therapeutic orientation, prior experience with technology, and perceived patient openness in shaping therapists' acceptance of online therapy. These results underscore the need for targeted training and support to facilitate the successful integration of digital technologies into routine psychotherapeutic practice. Future research should continue to explore these dynamics under non-crisis conditions to ensure the sustainable development of online therapy services.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.