用于鼻内给药的洛沙平干粉制剂的临床前开发。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Paul Shields, Irene Rossi, Daniela Schwotzer, Philip J Kuehl, Lucas Silva, Julie D Suman
{"title":"用于鼻内给药的洛沙平干粉制剂的临床前开发。","authors":"Paul Shields, Irene Rossi, Daniela Schwotzer, Philip J Kuehl, Lucas Silva, Julie D Suman","doi":"10.1177/19412711261470959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute agitation (AA) is a common symptom of psychiatric conditions such as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, resulting in 1.7 million emergency room visits per year in the United States. Loxapine, administered by inhalation, is an approved treatment for such scenarios. A boxed warning for bronchospasm when administered via inhalation limits its use to inpatient settings, making effective treatment for AA in outpatient settings an unmet need. The objective of this study was to develop and identify a lead intranasal dry powder formulation for outpatient treatment of AA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seven spray-dried nasal powders (Formulations A-G) consisting of loxapine succinate (Medichem, ES) and various excipients were manufactured and filled in a Unidose Nasal Powder system (Aptar Pharma, FR). In this pharmacokinetic study with non-compartmental analysis, formulations were evaluated both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> (<i>n</i> = 4 non-human primates [NHPs]). Formulations were characterized by yield, assay, water content, particle size distribution, emitted dose, and impactor-sized mass.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Formulation B, comprising mannitol and hypromellose with 30% loxapine by weight, was identified as the lead candidate. In the <i>in vivo</i> portion of the study, all formulations were well tolerated. The plasma versus time profile for the NHP study indicated that Formulation B achieved the greatest extent of absorption (203.9 ng/mL*h) compared to the intravenous (control) formulation (231.5 ng/mL*h), each administered as a 3 mg dose. The full pharmacokinetic results for all formulations showed similar rapid absorption following dosing, although the area under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentration were lower than those observed with Formulation B. All formulations had similar apparent terminal half-lives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Formulation B showed clear advantages both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>, supporting its suitability for further development as an outpatient treatment for AA in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":"19412711261470959"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preclinical Development of a Dry Powder Formulation of Loxapine for Intranasal Delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Shields, Irene Rossi, Daniela Schwotzer, Philip J Kuehl, Lucas Silva, Julie D Suman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19412711261470959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute agitation (AA) is a common symptom of psychiatric conditions such as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, resulting in 1.7 million emergency room visits per year in the United States. Loxapine, administered by inhalation, is an approved treatment for such scenarios. A boxed warning for bronchospasm when administered via inhalation limits its use to inpatient settings, making effective treatment for AA in outpatient settings an unmet need. The objective of this study was to develop and identify a lead intranasal dry powder formulation for outpatient treatment of AA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seven spray-dried nasal powders (Formulations A-G) consisting of loxapine succinate (Medichem, ES) and various excipients were manufactured and filled in a Unidose Nasal Powder system (Aptar Pharma, FR). In this pharmacokinetic study with non-compartmental analysis, formulations were evaluated both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> (<i>n</i> = 4 non-human primates [NHPs]). Formulations were characterized by yield, assay, water content, particle size distribution, emitted dose, and impactor-sized mass.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Formulation B, comprising mannitol and hypromellose with 30% loxapine by weight, was identified as the lead candidate. In the <i>in vivo</i> portion of the study, all formulations were well tolerated. The plasma versus time profile for the NHP study indicated that Formulation B achieved the greatest extent of absorption (203.9 ng/mL*h) compared to the intravenous (control) formulation (231.5 ng/mL*h), each administered as a 3 mg dose. The full pharmacokinetic results for all formulations showed similar rapid absorption following dosing, although the area under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentration were lower than those observed with Formulation B. All formulations had similar apparent terminal half-lives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Formulation B showed clear advantages both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>, supporting its suitability for further development as an outpatient treatment for AA in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19412711261470959\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711261470959\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19412711261470959","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性躁动(AA)是双相情感障碍和精神分裂症等精神疾病的常见症状,在美国每年有170万次急诊室就诊。吸入的洛沙平是一种被批准的治疗这种情况的药物。经吸入给药时支气管痉挛的黑框警告限制了其在住院患者的使用,使得在门诊环境中对AA的有效治疗成为一个未满足的需求。本研究的目的是开发和鉴定一种用于AA门诊治疗的含铅鼻内干粉制剂。材料和方法:制备了七种由琥珀酸洛沙平(Medichem, ES)和各种辅料组成的喷雾干燥鼻粉剂(配方a - g),并填充在Unidose鼻粉剂系统(Aptar Pharma, FR)中。在这项采用非区室分析的药代动力学研究中,对配方进行了体外和体内评估(n = 4只非人灵长类动物[NHPs])。配方的特点是产率、含量、含水量、粒度分布、发射剂量和撞击物大小的质量。结果:由甘露醇、羟丙甲糖和30%洛沙平(按重量计)组成的制剂B被确定为首选制剂。在体内部分的研究中,所有配方都具有良好的耐受性。NHP研究的血浆与时间曲线表明,与静脉(对照)制剂(231.5 ng/mL*h)相比,制剂B达到了最大的吸收程度(203.9 ng/mL*h),每次给药剂量为3mg。所有制剂的全药代动力学结果均显示出类似的给药后快速吸收,尽管浓度-时间曲线下面积和最大浓度低于制剂b。所有制剂均具有相似的表观末端半衰期。结论:制剂B在体外和体内均表现出明显的优势,支持其作为精神分裂症和双相情感障碍AA门诊治疗的进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preclinical Development of a Dry Powder Formulation of Loxapine for Intranasal Delivery.

Background: Acute agitation (AA) is a common symptom of psychiatric conditions such as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, resulting in 1.7 million emergency room visits per year in the United States. Loxapine, administered by inhalation, is an approved treatment for such scenarios. A boxed warning for bronchospasm when administered via inhalation limits its use to inpatient settings, making effective treatment for AA in outpatient settings an unmet need. The objective of this study was to develop and identify a lead intranasal dry powder formulation for outpatient treatment of AA.

Materials and methods: Seven spray-dried nasal powders (Formulations A-G) consisting of loxapine succinate (Medichem, ES) and various excipients were manufactured and filled in a Unidose Nasal Powder system (Aptar Pharma, FR). In this pharmacokinetic study with non-compartmental analysis, formulations were evaluated both in vitro and in vivo (n = 4 non-human primates [NHPs]). Formulations were characterized by yield, assay, water content, particle size distribution, emitted dose, and impactor-sized mass.

Results: Formulation B, comprising mannitol and hypromellose with 30% loxapine by weight, was identified as the lead candidate. In the in vivo portion of the study, all formulations were well tolerated. The plasma versus time profile for the NHP study indicated that Formulation B achieved the greatest extent of absorption (203.9 ng/mL*h) compared to the intravenous (control) formulation (231.5 ng/mL*h), each administered as a 3 mg dose. The full pharmacokinetic results for all formulations showed similar rapid absorption following dosing, although the area under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentration were lower than those observed with Formulation B. All formulations had similar apparent terminal half-lives.

Conclusions: Formulation B showed clear advantages both in vitro and in vivo, supporting its suitability for further development as an outpatient treatment for AA in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes: Pulmonary drug delivery Airway reactivity and asthma treatment Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract Toxic effects of inhaled agents Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书