实时临床心理健康评估的大型语言模型应用:当前潜力和未来方向。

IF 4.6 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Katie Aafjes-van Doorn, Francine Cheng Ty, Antonia Yuxin Hua, Chunlin An, Anna Van Meter
{"title":"实时临床心理健康评估的大型语言模型应用:当前潜力和未来方向。","authors":"Katie Aafjes-van Doorn, Francine Cheng Ty, Antonia Yuxin Hua, Chunlin An, Anna Van Meter","doi":"10.1037/abn0001155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing promise in the mental health field. LLMs are especially well suited to play a role in the labor-intensive, costly process of clinical assessment, as they can interact with a patient or participant directly to conduct a mental health assessment. We conducted a preregistered scoping review to (a) describe the unique capabilities of LLMs for clinical assessment, (b) determine the current state of the field in applying LLMs to directly assess patient/participant mental health (including screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of symptoms), and (c) highlight future research to facilitate the application of LLMs. We included work published in both Chinese and English. Only 10 studies met criteria for direct LLM-based mental health assessment. The evidence base was recent and heterogeneous: Four studies focused primarily on diagnostic interviewing or classification, five on symptom or severity assessment, and one on task-based multimodal depression assessment. Studies varied across text, voice, and multimodal formats, and depression was the dominant target. Across studies, stronger performance tended to be reported in tools that used structured interviewing logic, domain-specific adaptation, and clinically anchored reference standards. However, the evidence base remains small, with many studies employing limited validation procedures, and heavily weighted toward early-stage or nonjournal publications. The limited pace of academic validation means that, at present, LLMs are best understood as emerging assessment-support tools rather than replacements for clinical evaluation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large language model applications for real-time clinical mental health assessment: Current potential and future directions.\",\"authors\":\"Katie Aafjes-van Doorn, Francine Cheng Ty, Antonia Yuxin Hua, Chunlin An, Anna Van Meter\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/abn0001155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing promise in the mental health field. LLMs are especially well suited to play a role in the labor-intensive, costly process of clinical assessment, as they can interact with a patient or participant directly to conduct a mental health assessment. We conducted a preregistered scoping review to (a) describe the unique capabilities of LLMs for clinical assessment, (b) determine the current state of the field in applying LLMs to directly assess patient/participant mental health (including screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of symptoms), and (c) highlight future research to facilitate the application of LLMs. We included work published in both Chinese and English. Only 10 studies met criteria for direct LLM-based mental health assessment. The evidence base was recent and heterogeneous: Four studies focused primarily on diagnostic interviewing or classification, five on symptom or severity assessment, and one on task-based multimodal depression assessment. Studies varied across text, voice, and multimodal formats, and depression was the dominant target. Across studies, stronger performance tended to be reported in tools that used structured interviewing logic, domain-specific adaptation, and clinically anchored reference standards. However, the evidence base remains small, with many studies employing limited validation procedures, and heavily weighted toward early-stage or nonjournal publications. The limited pace of academic validation means that, at present, LLMs are best understood as emerging assessment-support tools rather than replacements for clinical evaluation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型语言模型(LLMs)在心理健康领域显示出越来越大的前景。法学硕士特别适合在劳动密集型、成本高昂的临床评估过程中发挥作用,因为他们可以直接与患者或参与者互动,进行心理健康评估。我们进行了一项预注册的范围审查,以(a)描述法学硕士用于临床评估的独特能力,(b)确定应用法学硕士直接评估患者/参与者心理健康(包括筛查、诊断和症状监测)的领域现状,以及(c)强调未来的研究,以促进法学硕士的应用。我们收录了以中文和英文发表的作品。只有10项研究符合直接基于法学硕士的心理健康评估标准。证据基础是最近的和异质性的:四项研究主要关注诊断性访谈或分类,五项研究关注症状或严重程度评估,一项研究关注基于任务的多模态抑郁症评估。研究涉及文本、语音和多模态格式,抑郁是主要目标。在所有研究中,使用结构化访谈逻辑、特定领域适应和临床锚定参考标准的工具往往表现更强。然而,证据基础仍然很小,许多研究采用有限的验证程序,并且严重偏重于早期或非期刊出版物。学术验证的有限步伐意味着,目前法学硕士最好被理解为新兴的评估支持工具,而不是临床评估的替代品。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large language model applications for real-time clinical mental health assessment: Current potential and future directions.

Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing promise in the mental health field. LLMs are especially well suited to play a role in the labor-intensive, costly process of clinical assessment, as they can interact with a patient or participant directly to conduct a mental health assessment. We conducted a preregistered scoping review to (a) describe the unique capabilities of LLMs for clinical assessment, (b) determine the current state of the field in applying LLMs to directly assess patient/participant mental health (including screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of symptoms), and (c) highlight future research to facilitate the application of LLMs. We included work published in both Chinese and English. Only 10 studies met criteria for direct LLM-based mental health assessment. The evidence base was recent and heterogeneous: Four studies focused primarily on diagnostic interviewing or classification, five on symptom or severity assessment, and one on task-based multimodal depression assessment. Studies varied across text, voice, and multimodal formats, and depression was the dominant target. Across studies, stronger performance tended to be reported in tools that used structured interviewing logic, domain-specific adaptation, and clinically anchored reference standards. However, the evidence base remains small, with many studies employing limited validation procedures, and heavily weighted toward early-stage or nonjournal publications. The limited pace of academic validation means that, at present, LLMs are best understood as emerging assessment-support tools rather than replacements for clinical evaluation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书