左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器与联合经宫颈子宫内膜切除术治疗子宫腺肌症的随机临床试验

IF 2.1 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT Pub Date : 2026-05-13 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-25-00021
Murali Subbaiah, Yavana Suriya, Nevetha Selvarajan
{"title":"左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器与联合经宫颈子宫内膜切除术治疗子宫腺肌症的随机临床试验","authors":"Murali Subbaiah, Yavana Suriya, Nevetha Selvarajan","doi":"10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-25-00021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the treatment failure rates in patients with adenomyosis who underwent transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) and levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) insertion versus those with LNG-IUD insertion alone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and forty-six women with adenomyosis and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) or dysmenorrhea were enrolled in this randomized controlled clinical trial (CTRI/2020/09/027592). One group had TCRE with LNG-IUD insertion and the other group had only LNG-IUD insertion. Baseline assessment included quality of life score (World Health Organisation quality of life-BREF [WHO QOL-BREF]), and menorrhagia multi-attribute scale (MMAS) score. The patients in both the treatment arms were followed up for 12 months. The scores were reassessed at 12 months along with LNG-IUD expulsion rates and treatment failure, which included any of the following: hysterectomy for adenomyosis, persistent HMB, or persistent dysmenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome of treatment failure was significantly lower in the TCRE + LNG-IUD group (7.14% vs. 25%, <i>P</i> = 0.01; Risk ratio 3.45, 95% Confidence interval (1.35-8.83). The quality-of-life (WHO QOL-BREF) and MMAS scores at 12 months were also significantly better in the TCRE + LNG-IUD arm. None of the women in the combined TCRE and LNG-IUD group had LNG-IUD expulsion at 12 months compared to the LNG-IUD expulsion rate of 8.8% in the LNG-IUD alone group (<i>P</i> = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combination of TCRE with LNG-IUD had a lower failure rate at 12 months in women with adenomyosis compared to LNG-IUD alone. This combination also resulted in better quality of life and lowered the chance of LNG-IUD expulsion at 12 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":45272,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","volume":"15 3","pages":"227-231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13427150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device versus Combined Transcervical Resection of the Endometrium in the Management of Adenomyosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Murali Subbaiah, Yavana Suriya, Nevetha Selvarajan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-25-00021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the treatment failure rates in patients with adenomyosis who underwent transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) and levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) insertion versus those with LNG-IUD insertion alone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and forty-six women with adenomyosis and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) or dysmenorrhea were enrolled in this randomized controlled clinical trial (CTRI/2020/09/027592). One group had TCRE with LNG-IUD insertion and the other group had only LNG-IUD insertion. Baseline assessment included quality of life score (World Health Organisation quality of life-BREF [WHO QOL-BREF]), and menorrhagia multi-attribute scale (MMAS) score. The patients in both the treatment arms were followed up for 12 months. The scores were reassessed at 12 months along with LNG-IUD expulsion rates and treatment failure, which included any of the following: hysterectomy for adenomyosis, persistent HMB, or persistent dysmenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome of treatment failure was significantly lower in the TCRE + LNG-IUD group (7.14% vs. 25%, <i>P</i> = 0.01; Risk ratio 3.45, 95% Confidence interval (1.35-8.83). The quality-of-life (WHO QOL-BREF) and MMAS scores at 12 months were also significantly better in the TCRE + LNG-IUD arm. None of the women in the combined TCRE and LNG-IUD group had LNG-IUD expulsion at 12 months compared to the LNG-IUD expulsion rate of 8.8% in the LNG-IUD alone group (<i>P</i> = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A combination of TCRE with LNG-IUD had a lower failure rate at 12 months in women with adenomyosis compared to LNG-IUD alone. This combination also resulted in better quality of life and lowered the chance of LNG-IUD expulsion at 12 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"227-231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13427150/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-25-00021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-25-00021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较经宫颈子宫内膜切除术(TCRE)联合左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器(LNG-IUD)与单独植入LNG-IUD的治疗失败率。材料与方法:随机对照临床试验(CTRI/2020/09/027592)纳入146例bbb合并重度月经出血(HMB)或痛经的女性。一组采用TCRE合并LNG-IUD,另一组仅采用LNG-IUD。基线评估包括生活质量评分(世界卫生组织生活质量bref [WHO QOL-BREF])和月经过多多属性量表(MMAS)评分。两组患者均随访12个月。在12个月时重新评估评分,同时评估LNG-IUD排出率和治疗失败情况,包括以下任何一种情况:子宫切除术的bbb,持续性HMB或持续性痛经。结果:TCRE + LNG-IUD组治疗失败的主要结局明显低于对照组(7.14% vs. 25%, P = 0.01);风险比3.45,95%可信区间1.35 ~ 8.83。TCRE + LNG-IUD组12个月时的生活质量(WHO QOL-BREF)和MMAS评分也明显更好。TCRE联合LNG-IUD组在12个月时没有一例发生LNG-IUD排出,而单独使用LNG-IUD组的LNG-IUD排出率为8.8% (P = 0.013)。结论:与单独使用LNG-IUD相比,TCRE联合使用LNG-IUD在12个月时的失败率更低。这种组合也导致了更好的生活质量,并降低了12个月时LNG-IUD排出的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device versus Combined Transcervical Resection of the Endometrium in the Management of Adenomyosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Objectives: To compare the treatment failure rates in patients with adenomyosis who underwent transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) and levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) insertion versus those with LNG-IUD insertion alone.

Materials and methods: One hundred and forty-six women with adenomyosis and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) or dysmenorrhea were enrolled in this randomized controlled clinical trial (CTRI/2020/09/027592). One group had TCRE with LNG-IUD insertion and the other group had only LNG-IUD insertion. Baseline assessment included quality of life score (World Health Organisation quality of life-BREF [WHO QOL-BREF]), and menorrhagia multi-attribute scale (MMAS) score. The patients in both the treatment arms were followed up for 12 months. The scores were reassessed at 12 months along with LNG-IUD expulsion rates and treatment failure, which included any of the following: hysterectomy for adenomyosis, persistent HMB, or persistent dysmenorrhea.

Results: The primary outcome of treatment failure was significantly lower in the TCRE + LNG-IUD group (7.14% vs. 25%, P = 0.01; Risk ratio 3.45, 95% Confidence interval (1.35-8.83). The quality-of-life (WHO QOL-BREF) and MMAS scores at 12 months were also significantly better in the TCRE + LNG-IUD arm. None of the women in the combined TCRE and LNG-IUD group had LNG-IUD expulsion at 12 months compared to the LNG-IUD expulsion rate of 8.8% in the LNG-IUD alone group (P = 0.013).

Conclusion: A combination of TCRE with LNG-IUD had a lower failure rate at 12 months in women with adenomyosis compared to LNG-IUD alone. This combination also resulted in better quality of life and lowered the chance of LNG-IUD expulsion at 12 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书