Michael Metoudi, Isabelle Sadler, Shireen Kassam, Dagfinn Aune
{"title":"豆类和大豆消费与高血压风险:前瞻性研究的系统回顾和剂量反应荟萃分析。","authors":"Michael Metoudi, Isabelle Sadler, Shireen Kassam, Dagfinn Aune","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2025-001449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies have suggested that high intakes of legumes and soy products are associated with a lower risk of hypertension; however, the results have been inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the association between legumes and soy consumption and the risk of hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to 14 June 2025. Random effects models were used to calculate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association between legume or soy consumption and hypertension risk. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I<sup>2</sup>. The likelihood of causality was evaluated using World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 prospective studies were included in the meta-analysis. The summary RR for high versus low intake of legumes was 0.84 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.93, I<sup>2</sup>=65%, p<sub>heterogeneity</sub>=0.003, n=10 studies, 86 098 cases, 309 853 participants) and for soy was 0.81 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.93, I<sup>2</sup>=82%, p<sub>heterogeneity</sub><0.0001, n=7 studies, 93 934 cases, 278 200 participants). In the linear dose-response analyses, the summary RR per 100 g/day was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.97, I<sup>2</sup>=69%, p<sub>heterogeneity</sub>=0.001, n=10) for legumes and 0.76 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.96, I<sup>2</sup>=89%, p<sub>heterogeneity</sub><0.0001, n=6) for soy. The test for non-linearity was not significant for legumes (p<sub>non-linearity</sub>=0.13), suggesting a linear reduction in risk up to ~170 g/day, while for soy there was indication of non-linearity (p<sub>non-linearity</sub>=0.01), and most of the reduction in risk was observed up to an intake around 60-80 g/day. Although there was an indication of publication bias with Egger's test (p=0.04) for legumes, this was explained by two outlying studies. Using WCRF criteria, the likelihood of causality was considered probable for both legumes and soy in relation to hypertension risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this meta-analysis of 12 prospective cohort studies, legume and soy intakes were associated with lower risk of hypertension. These findings support dietary recommendations to increase the intake of legumes in the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001449"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13425121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legume and soy consumption and the risk of hypertension: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Metoudi, Isabelle Sadler, Shireen Kassam, Dagfinn Aune\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjnph-2025-001449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies have suggested that high intakes of legumes and soy products are associated with a lower risk of hypertension; however, the results have been inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the association between legumes and soy consumption and the risk of hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to 14 June 2025. Random effects models were used to calculate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association between legume or soy consumption and hypertension risk. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I<sup>2</sup>. The likelihood of causality was evaluated using World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>12 prospective studies were included in the meta-analysis. The summary RR for high versus low intake of legumes was 0.84 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.93, I<sup>2</sup>=65%, p<sub>heterogeneity</sub>=0.003, n=10 studies, 86 098 cases, 309 853 participants) and for soy was 0.81 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.93, I<sup>2</sup>=82%, p<sub>heterogeneity</sub><0.0001, n=7 studies, 93 934 cases, 278 200 participants). In the linear dose-response analyses, the summary RR per 100 g/day was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.97, I<sup>2</sup>=69%, p<sub>heterogeneity</sub>=0.001, n=10) for legumes and 0.76 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.96, I<sup>2</sup>=89%, p<sub>heterogeneity</sub><0.0001, n=6) for soy. The test for non-linearity was not significant for legumes (p<sub>non-linearity</sub>=0.13), suggesting a linear reduction in risk up to ~170 g/day, while for soy there was indication of non-linearity (p<sub>non-linearity</sub>=0.01), and most of the reduction in risk was observed up to an intake around 60-80 g/day. Although there was an indication of publication bias with Egger's test (p=0.04) for legumes, this was explained by two outlying studies. Using WCRF criteria, the likelihood of causality was considered probable for both legumes and soy in relation to hypertension risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this meta-analysis of 12 prospective cohort studies, legume and soy intakes were associated with lower risk of hypertension. These findings support dietary recommendations to increase the intake of legumes in the general population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"e001449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13425121/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2025-001449\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2025-001449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:一些研究表明,大量摄入豆类和豆制品与较低的高血压风险有关;然而,结果却不一致。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以澄清豆类和大豆消费与高血压风险之间的关系。方法:检索至2025年6月14日的PubMed和Embase数据库。随机效应模型用于计算豆类或大豆消费与高血压风险之间的总相对危险度(rr)和95%置信区间(95% ci)。采用I2评价异质性。使用世界癌症研究基金会(WCRF)标准评估因果关系的可能性。结果:meta分析纳入了12项前瞻性研究。摘要高与低摄入豆类RR为0.84 (95% CI 0.77 - 0.93, I2 = 65%, pheterogeneity = 0.003, n = 10研究,86 098例,309 853名参与者)和大豆为0.81 (95% CI 0.70 - 0.93, I2 = 82%, pheterogeneity2 = 69%, pheterogeneity = 0.001, n = 10)豆类为0.76 (95% CI 0.60 - 0.96, I2 = 89%, pheterogeneitynon-linearity = 0.13),表明线性减少风险~ 170克/天,而对于大豆有非线性的迹象(pnon-linearity = 0.01),大多数风险的降低是在每天摄入60-80克左右观察到的。虽然在豆科植物的Egger检验中有发表偏倚的迹象(p=0.04),但这是由两项外围研究解释的。使用WCRF标准,考虑到豆类和大豆与高血压风险之间可能存在因果关系。结论:在这项包含12项前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析中,豆类和大豆摄入与降低高血压风险相关。这些发现支持了在普通人群中增加豆类摄入量的饮食建议。
Legume and soy consumption and the risk of hypertension: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Background: Several studies have suggested that high intakes of legumes and soy products are associated with a lower risk of hypertension; however, the results have been inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the association between legumes and soy consumption and the risk of hypertension.
Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to 14 June 2025. Random effects models were used to calculate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the association between legume or soy consumption and hypertension risk. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2. The likelihood of causality was evaluated using World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) criteria.
Results: 12 prospective studies were included in the meta-analysis. The summary RR for high versus low intake of legumes was 0.84 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.93, I2=65%, pheterogeneity=0.003, n=10 studies, 86 098 cases, 309 853 participants) and for soy was 0.81 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.93, I2=82%, pheterogeneity<0.0001, n=7 studies, 93 934 cases, 278 200 participants). In the linear dose-response analyses, the summary RR per 100 g/day was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.97, I2=69%, pheterogeneity=0.001, n=10) for legumes and 0.76 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.96, I2=89%, pheterogeneity<0.0001, n=6) for soy. The test for non-linearity was not significant for legumes (pnon-linearity=0.13), suggesting a linear reduction in risk up to ~170 g/day, while for soy there was indication of non-linearity (pnon-linearity=0.01), and most of the reduction in risk was observed up to an intake around 60-80 g/day. Although there was an indication of publication bias with Egger's test (p=0.04) for legumes, this was explained by two outlying studies. Using WCRF criteria, the likelihood of causality was considered probable for both legumes and soy in relation to hypertension risk.
Conclusion: In this meta-analysis of 12 prospective cohort studies, legume and soy intakes were associated with lower risk of hypertension. These findings support dietary recommendations to increase the intake of legumes in the general population.