同时发生的社交焦虑和抑郁中的奖励缺陷:快感缺乏、无聊、孤独和COVID-19社会限制的作用

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1002/jclp.70204
Nathan M. Hager, Alicia L. Milam, Hannah C. Hamrick, Benjamin Swanson, Matt R. Judah
{"title":"同时发生的社交焦虑和抑郁中的奖励缺陷:快感缺乏、无聊、孤独和COVID-19社会限制的作用","authors":"Nathan M. Hager,&nbsp;Alicia L. Milam,&nbsp;Hannah C. Hamrick,&nbsp;Benjamin Swanson,&nbsp;Matt R. Judah","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prior research points toward reward deficits as crucial to the link between social anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. However, studies have not explored specific types of reward deficits or how social-environmental factors may impact them. The current study examined whether the indirect effects of three reward deficits (anhedonia, boredom, and loneliness) accounted for the connection between social anxiety and depression. Questionnaires were collected in a sample of college students (<i>N</i> = 523) during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing examination of environmental stressors (i.e., remote learning and current friend network size) on reward deficits. Indirect effect models showed that anhedonia, boredom, and loneliness each uniquely partly accounted for the association between social anxiety and depression (accounting for 20%, 38%, and 14% of the association, respectively), with boredom accounting for the largest proportion. Further, analyses suggested that anhedonia was associated with the social anxiety-depression link only among remote learners, while loneliness appeared to be only associated among students who had smaller friend networks. Findings highlight the importance of reward deficits in co-occurring social anxiety-depression symptoms. We present novel findings showing the strong role of boredom in the connection between social anxiety and depression symptoms, suggesting a new transdiagnostic treatment target. Social-environmental stressors, such as remote learning and contact with fewer friends, may exacerbate the connection between reward deficits and social anxiety-depression co-occurrence and serve as areas for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"82 11","pages":"1851-1864"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.70204","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reward Deficits in Co-Occurring Social Anxiety and Depression: The Roles of Anhedonia, Boredom, Loneliness, and COVID-19 Social Restriction\",\"authors\":\"Nathan M. Hager,&nbsp;Alicia L. Milam,&nbsp;Hannah C. Hamrick,&nbsp;Benjamin Swanson,&nbsp;Matt R. Judah\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jclp.70204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Prior research points toward reward deficits as crucial to the link between social anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. However, studies have not explored specific types of reward deficits or how social-environmental factors may impact them. The current study examined whether the indirect effects of three reward deficits (anhedonia, boredom, and loneliness) accounted for the connection between social anxiety and depression. Questionnaires were collected in a sample of college students (<i>N</i> = 523) during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing examination of environmental stressors (i.e., remote learning and current friend network size) on reward deficits. Indirect effect models showed that anhedonia, boredom, and loneliness each uniquely partly accounted for the association between social anxiety and depression (accounting for 20%, 38%, and 14% of the association, respectively), with boredom accounting for the largest proportion. Further, analyses suggested that anhedonia was associated with the social anxiety-depression link only among remote learners, while loneliness appeared to be only associated among students who had smaller friend networks. Findings highlight the importance of reward deficits in co-occurring social anxiety-depression symptoms. We present novel findings showing the strong role of boredom in the connection between social anxiety and depression symptoms, suggesting a new transdiagnostic treatment target. Social-environmental stressors, such as remote learning and contact with fewer friends, may exacerbate the connection between reward deficits and social anxiety-depression co-occurrence and serve as areas for intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"82 11\",\"pages\":\"1851-1864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.70204\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.70204\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.70204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究指出,奖励缺陷是社交焦虑障碍和重度抑郁症之间联系的关键。然而,研究并没有探索具体类型的奖励缺陷或社会环境因素如何影响它们。目前的研究考察了三种奖励缺陷(快感缺乏、无聊和孤独)的间接影响是否能解释社交焦虑和抑郁之间的联系。在COVID-19大流行的第一年,在大学生样本(N = 523)中收集了问卷,允许检查环境压力因素(即远程学习和当前朋友网络规模)对奖励缺陷的影响。间接效应模型显示,快感缺乏、无聊和孤独各自在一定程度上解释了社交焦虑和抑郁之间的关联(分别占关联的20%、38%和14%),其中无聊占最大比例。进一步的分析表明,快感缺乏症只与远程学习者的社交焦虑抑郁联系在一起,而孤独感似乎只与朋友圈较小的学生有关。研究结果强调了奖励缺陷在同时发生的社交焦虑抑郁症状中的重要性。我们提出了新的发现,表明无聊在社交焦虑和抑郁症状之间的联系中起着重要作用,提出了一个新的跨诊断治疗目标。社会环境压力因素,如远程学习和与更少的朋友接触,可能会加剧奖励缺陷与社交焦虑抑郁共存之间的联系,可以作为干预领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reward Deficits in Co-Occurring Social Anxiety and Depression: The Roles of Anhedonia, Boredom, Loneliness, and COVID-19 Social Restriction

Prior research points toward reward deficits as crucial to the link between social anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. However, studies have not explored specific types of reward deficits or how social-environmental factors may impact them. The current study examined whether the indirect effects of three reward deficits (anhedonia, boredom, and loneliness) accounted for the connection between social anxiety and depression. Questionnaires were collected in a sample of college students (N = 523) during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing examination of environmental stressors (i.e., remote learning and current friend network size) on reward deficits. Indirect effect models showed that anhedonia, boredom, and loneliness each uniquely partly accounted for the association between social anxiety and depression (accounting for 20%, 38%, and 14% of the association, respectively), with boredom accounting for the largest proportion. Further, analyses suggested that anhedonia was associated with the social anxiety-depression link only among remote learners, while loneliness appeared to be only associated among students who had smaller friend networks. Findings highlight the importance of reward deficits in co-occurring social anxiety-depression symptoms. We present novel findings showing the strong role of boredom in the connection between social anxiety and depression symptoms, suggesting a new transdiagnostic treatment target. Social-environmental stressors, such as remote learning and contact with fewer friends, may exacerbate the connection between reward deficits and social anxiety-depression co-occurrence and serve as areas for intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书