臭氧水作为一种预防性口腔卫生助剂:对其减少牙菌斑作用的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 Q3 Dentistry
Rahul Mohandas, Subhashree Mohapatra, Reshma Poothakulath Krishnan
{"title":"臭氧水作为一种预防性口腔卫生助剂:对其减少牙菌斑作用的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Rahul Mohandas, Subhashree Mohapatra, Reshma Poothakulath Krishnan","doi":"10.1038/s41432-026-01245-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ozonated water is increasingly being explored as a gentler alternative to chlorhexidine for chemical plaque control because of its antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties and the absence of common side effects such as staining or altered taste. However, the evidence on its effectiveness—especially in healthy individuals—remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether ozonated water is more effective than placebo or chlorhexidine mouthwash in reducing dental plaque. An extensive literature search was carried out across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar up to August 5, 2025. Randomized controlled trials involving healthy participants and comparing ozonated water with placebo or chlorhexidine were included. In total, five studies were selected for qualitative synthesis, of which four were included in the meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. A random-effects model was applied to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals. The meta-analysis suggested that ozonated water may provide slightly better short-term plaque reduction than placebo or chlorhexidine (SMD = −1.35; 95% CI: −2.77 to 0.06). However, as the confidence interval crossed the line of no effect, this difference was not statistically significant. Risk of bias was high in one study, unclear in three studies, and low in one study. The overall certainty for plaque reduction was rated as “low”. While ozonated water appears to be a promising short-term option for plaque control—especially for individuals unable to tolerate chlorhexidine—the current evidence is not strong enough to confirm that it works better than standard rinses or even plain water. Well-designed, longer-term clinical trials are needed before ozonated water can be recommended for routine daily use.","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":"27 3","pages":"84-85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ozonated water as a preventive oral hygiene aid: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its role in reducing dental plaque\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Mohandas, Subhashree Mohapatra, Reshma Poothakulath Krishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41432-026-01245-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ozonated water is increasingly being explored as a gentler alternative to chlorhexidine for chemical plaque control because of its antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties and the absence of common side effects such as staining or altered taste. However, the evidence on its effectiveness—especially in healthy individuals—remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether ozonated water is more effective than placebo or chlorhexidine mouthwash in reducing dental plaque. An extensive literature search was carried out across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar up to August 5, 2025. Randomized controlled trials involving healthy participants and comparing ozonated water with placebo or chlorhexidine were included. In total, five studies were selected for qualitative synthesis, of which four were included in the meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. A random-effects model was applied to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals. The meta-analysis suggested that ozonated water may provide slightly better short-term plaque reduction than placebo or chlorhexidine (SMD = −1.35; 95% CI: −2.77 to 0.06). However, as the confidence interval crossed the line of no effect, this difference was not statistically significant. Risk of bias was high in one study, unclear in three studies, and low in one study. The overall certainty for plaque reduction was rated as “low”. While ozonated water appears to be a promising short-term option for plaque control—especially for individuals unable to tolerate chlorhexidine—the current evidence is not strong enough to confirm that it works better than standard rinses or even plain water. Well-designed, longer-term clinical trials are needed before ozonated water can be recommended for routine daily use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based dentistry\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"84-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-026-01245-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-026-01245-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于臭氧水具有抗菌和抗炎的特性,并且没有常见的副作用,如染色或改变味道,因此人们越来越多地探索臭氧水作为氯己定化学斑块控制的更温和的替代品。然而,其有效性的证据——尤其是对健康个体的有效性——仍不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定臭氧水在减少牙菌斑方面是否比安慰剂或氯己定漱口水更有效。方法:截至2025年8月5日,在PubMed、Cochrane Library、Scopus、Web of Science、LILACS、ScienceDirect、EBSCOhost和谷歌Scholar等网站进行了广泛的文献检索。纳入了随机对照试验,涉及健康参与者,并将臭氧化水与安慰剂或氯己定进行比较。共选择5项研究进行定性综合,其中4项纳入meta分析。使用RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。采用随机效应模型计算标准化平均差(SMDs),置信区间为95%。结果:荟萃分析表明,臭氧化水可能比安慰剂或氯己定提供稍好的短期斑块减少(SMD = -1.35; 95% CI: -2.77至0.06)。然而,由于置信区间越过无影响线,这种差异在统计上不显著。一项研究的偏倚风险高,三项研究的偏倚风险不明确,一项研究的偏倚风险低。斑块减少的总体确定性被评为“低”。结论:虽然臭氧水似乎是一个很有希望的短期选择,特别是对不能耐受氯己定的人,但目前的证据还不足以证实它比标准冲洗甚至普通水更有效。在推荐日常使用臭氧水之前,需要经过精心设计的长期临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ozonated water as a preventive oral hygiene aid: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its role in reducing dental plaque
Ozonated water is increasingly being explored as a gentler alternative to chlorhexidine for chemical plaque control because of its antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties and the absence of common side effects such as staining or altered taste. However, the evidence on its effectiveness—especially in healthy individuals—remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether ozonated water is more effective than placebo or chlorhexidine mouthwash in reducing dental plaque. An extensive literature search was carried out across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar up to August 5, 2025. Randomized controlled trials involving healthy participants and comparing ozonated water with placebo or chlorhexidine were included. In total, five studies were selected for qualitative synthesis, of which four were included in the meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. A random-effects model was applied to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals. The meta-analysis suggested that ozonated water may provide slightly better short-term plaque reduction than placebo or chlorhexidine (SMD = −1.35; 95% CI: −2.77 to 0.06). However, as the confidence interval crossed the line of no effect, this difference was not statistically significant. Risk of bias was high in one study, unclear in three studies, and low in one study. The overall certainty for plaque reduction was rated as “low”. While ozonated water appears to be a promising short-term option for plaque control—especially for individuals unable to tolerate chlorhexidine—the current evidence is not strong enough to confirm that it works better than standard rinses or even plain water. Well-designed, longer-term clinical trials are needed before ozonated water can be recommended for routine daily use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书