{"title":"面向应用的高级氧化工艺:大规模部署的关键挑战和途径","authors":"Yue Jiang, Mingyang Xing","doi":"10.1021/accountsmr.6c00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Advanced oxidation technologies\r\nbased on environmental functional\r\nmaterials are widely recognized as a key technical foundation for\r\nachieving deep industrial pollution control while simultaneously enabling\r\ncarbon mitigation. However, a pronounced gap persists between laboratory-scale\r\nresearch and practical engineering implementation. Many material systems\r\nthat exhibit excellent performance at the milligram scale under well-controlled\r\nlaboratory conditions often fail to meet the requirements of real-world\r\ntreatment scenarios, which typically involve ton-scale throughput,\r\ncontinuous operation, and highly complex operating environments. This\r\nfundamental mismatch is not merely a materials issue, but rather a\r\nconsequence of a prevailing research paradigm that has long prioritized\r\nmaximizing intrinsic material performance and refining catalytic reaction\r\nmechanisms, while largely overlooking the inevitable constraints associated\r\nwith scale-up, including engineering feasibility, economic sustainability,\r\noperational robustness, as well as low-carbon and safety considerations.</p><p>In real industrial scenarios, catalytic materials do not function\r\nas isolated entities; rather, their practical effectiveness is tightly\r\nintertwined with reactor configuration, mass-transfer efficiency,\r\nand energy delivery modes. Under such conditions, an overemphasis\r\non maximizing intrinsic metrics often proves counterproductive during\r\nscale-up. These laboratory-optimized designs may exacerbate catalyst\r\ndeactivation, intensify energy demand, drive up operational costs,\r\nand even introduce cumulative environmental risks, thereby eroding\r\nthe overall technological advantage under realistic operating conditions.\r\nCollectively, these limitations highlight the necessity of shifting\r\naway from a strictly “material-centric” research paradigm\r\ntoward a process-oriented design strategy that is explicitly guided\r\nby real-world operating demands, with integrated consideration of\r\nlow-carbon performance, environmental safety, and long-term operational\r\nrobustness.</p><p>Based on these considerations, this review proposes\r\nan industry-oriented\r\nclosed-loop research paradigm aimed at bridging the gap between laboratory\r\ninnovation and practical deployment. Specifically, real engineering\r\ndemands are first used to backward-define the functional positioning\r\nand optimization of materials, thereby aligning material design with\r\napplication-relevant performance targets. Subsequently, material–equipment\r\nintegration is achieved through dedicated reactor and process development,\r\nenabling the effective translation of intrinsic material capabilities\r\ninto system-level efficiency at the reactor scale. Furthermore, life-cycle\r\nassessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) are systematically\r\nincorporated to impose upstream constraints on energy consumption,\r\ncarbon emissions, cost and environmental risks, ensuring environmental\r\nand economic sustainability of the proposed technological pathway.\r\nFinally, through the establishment of industry standards and validation\r\nvia engineering demonstrations, this paradigm facilitates the normalization,\r\nreproducibility, and scalable dissemination of the technology, effectively\r\nshortening the transition from laboratory outcomes to real-world implementation\r\nand providing a viable route for the industrial application of environmental\r\nfunctional materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":72040,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of materials research","volume":"7 5","pages":"510–519"},"PeriodicalIF":14.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application-Oriented Advanced Oxidation Processes: Key Challenges and Pathways toward Large-Scale Deployment\",\"authors\":\"Yue Jiang, Mingyang Xing\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/accountsmr.6c00036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Advanced oxidation technologies\\r\\nbased on environmental functional\\r\\nmaterials are widely recognized as a key technical foundation for\\r\\nachieving deep industrial pollution control while simultaneously enabling\\r\\ncarbon mitigation. However, a pronounced gap persists between laboratory-scale\\r\\nresearch and practical engineering implementation. Many material systems\\r\\nthat exhibit excellent performance at the milligram scale under well-controlled\\r\\nlaboratory conditions often fail to meet the requirements of real-world\\r\\ntreatment scenarios, which typically involve ton-scale throughput,\\r\\ncontinuous operation, and highly complex operating environments. This\\r\\nfundamental mismatch is not merely a materials issue, but rather a\\r\\nconsequence of a prevailing research paradigm that has long prioritized\\r\\nmaximizing intrinsic material performance and refining catalytic reaction\\r\\nmechanisms, while largely overlooking the inevitable constraints associated\\r\\nwith scale-up, including engineering feasibility, economic sustainability,\\r\\noperational robustness, as well as low-carbon and safety considerations.</p><p>In real industrial scenarios, catalytic materials do not function\\r\\nas isolated entities; rather, their practical effectiveness is tightly\\r\\nintertwined with reactor configuration, mass-transfer efficiency,\\r\\nand energy delivery modes. Under such conditions, an overemphasis\\r\\non maximizing intrinsic metrics often proves counterproductive during\\r\\nscale-up. These laboratory-optimized designs may exacerbate catalyst\\r\\ndeactivation, intensify energy demand, drive up operational costs,\\r\\nand even introduce cumulative environmental risks, thereby eroding\\r\\nthe overall technological advantage under realistic operating conditions.\\r\\nCollectively, these limitations highlight the necessity of shifting\\r\\naway from a strictly “material-centric” research paradigm\\r\\ntoward a process-oriented design strategy that is explicitly guided\\r\\nby real-world operating demands, with integrated consideration of\\r\\nlow-carbon performance, environmental safety, and long-term operational\\r\\nrobustness.</p><p>Based on these considerations, this review proposes\\r\\nan industry-oriented\\r\\nclosed-loop research paradigm aimed at bridging the gap between laboratory\\r\\ninnovation and practical deployment. Specifically, real engineering\\r\\ndemands are first used to backward-define the functional positioning\\r\\nand optimization of materials, thereby aligning material design with\\r\\napplication-relevant performance targets. Subsequently, material–equipment\\r\\nintegration is achieved through dedicated reactor and process development,\\r\\nenabling the effective translation of intrinsic material capabilities\\r\\ninto system-level efficiency at the reactor scale. Furthermore, life-cycle\\r\\nassessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) are systematically\\r\\nincorporated to impose upstream constraints on energy consumption,\\r\\ncarbon emissions, cost and environmental risks, ensuring environmental\\r\\nand economic sustainability of the proposed technological pathway.\\r\\nFinally, through the establishment of industry standards and validation\\r\\nvia engineering demonstrations, this paradigm facilitates the normalization,\\r\\nreproducibility, and scalable dissemination of the technology, effectively\\r\\nshortening the transition from laboratory outcomes to real-world implementation\\r\\nand providing a viable route for the industrial application of environmental\\r\\nfunctional materials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of materials research\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"510–519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of materials research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/accountsmr.6c00036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of materials research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/accountsmr.6c00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advanced oxidation technologies
based on environmental functional
materials are widely recognized as a key technical foundation for
achieving deep industrial pollution control while simultaneously enabling
carbon mitigation. However, a pronounced gap persists between laboratory-scale
research and practical engineering implementation. Many material systems
that exhibit excellent performance at the milligram scale under well-controlled
laboratory conditions often fail to meet the requirements of real-world
treatment scenarios, which typically involve ton-scale throughput,
continuous operation, and highly complex operating environments. This
fundamental mismatch is not merely a materials issue, but rather a
consequence of a prevailing research paradigm that has long prioritized
maximizing intrinsic material performance and refining catalytic reaction
mechanisms, while largely overlooking the inevitable constraints associated
with scale-up, including engineering feasibility, economic sustainability,
operational robustness, as well as low-carbon and safety considerations.
In real industrial scenarios, catalytic materials do not function
as isolated entities; rather, their practical effectiveness is tightly
intertwined with reactor configuration, mass-transfer efficiency,
and energy delivery modes. Under such conditions, an overemphasis
on maximizing intrinsic metrics often proves counterproductive during
scale-up. These laboratory-optimized designs may exacerbate catalyst
deactivation, intensify energy demand, drive up operational costs,
and even introduce cumulative environmental risks, thereby eroding
the overall technological advantage under realistic operating conditions.
Collectively, these limitations highlight the necessity of shifting
away from a strictly “material-centric” research paradigm
toward a process-oriented design strategy that is explicitly guided
by real-world operating demands, with integrated consideration of
low-carbon performance, environmental safety, and long-term operational
robustness.
Based on these considerations, this review proposes
an industry-oriented
closed-loop research paradigm aimed at bridging the gap between laboratory
innovation and practical deployment. Specifically, real engineering
demands are first used to backward-define the functional positioning
and optimization of materials, thereby aligning material design with
application-relevant performance targets. Subsequently, material–equipment
integration is achieved through dedicated reactor and process development,
enabling the effective translation of intrinsic material capabilities
into system-level efficiency at the reactor scale. Furthermore, life-cycle
assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) are systematically
incorporated to impose upstream constraints on energy consumption,
carbon emissions, cost and environmental risks, ensuring environmental
and economic sustainability of the proposed technological pathway.
Finally, through the establishment of industry standards and validation
via engineering demonstrations, this paradigm facilitates the normalization,
reproducibility, and scalable dissemination of the technology, effectively
shortening the transition from laboratory outcomes to real-world implementation
and providing a viable route for the industrial application of environmental
functional materials.