{"title":"指数随机图模型的边际结构效应","authors":"Scott W. Duxbury","doi":"10.1177/00491241261467919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exponential random graph models (ERGMs) are now a staple for social network analysis due to their ability to parameterize effects from endogenous network structures, such as two stars and triangles. However, interpreting coefficients for structural ERGM terms poses two problems. First, it is not possible to change the value of a structural term “holding all else constant” in models with nontrivial dyadic dependencies. Second, parameters for structural ERGM terms may be affected by scaling (noncollapsibility), which can alter the direction, size, and significance of structural coefficients. While the first issue is known in the literature, the second has not been previously reported. This study introduces a methodological framework based on marginal structural effects (MSEs) to address both problems. MSEs capture the discrete marginal effect of an endogenous network structure by calculating the difference in probability when comparing two potential ties that differ only by the value of a structural term. MSEs provide an intuitive interpretation for structural network effects and are robust to the effects of scaling. Extensions to comparisons between models, interactions with exogenous covariates, and analysis of samples of networks are discussed. An example is provided using the largest AddHealth school network to demonstrate how the framework can be applied.","PeriodicalId":21849,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methods & Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marginal Structural Effects for Exponential Random Graph Models\",\"authors\":\"Scott W. Duxbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00491241261467919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Exponential random graph models (ERGMs) are now a staple for social network analysis due to their ability to parameterize effects from endogenous network structures, such as two stars and triangles. However, interpreting coefficients for structural ERGM terms poses two problems. First, it is not possible to change the value of a structural term “holding all else constant” in models with nontrivial dyadic dependencies. Second, parameters for structural ERGM terms may be affected by scaling (noncollapsibility), which can alter the direction, size, and significance of structural coefficients. While the first issue is known in the literature, the second has not been previously reported. This study introduces a methodological framework based on marginal structural effects (MSEs) to address both problems. MSEs capture the discrete marginal effect of an endogenous network structure by calculating the difference in probability when comparing two potential ties that differ only by the value of a structural term. MSEs provide an intuitive interpretation for structural network effects and are robust to the effects of scaling. Extensions to comparisons between models, interactions with exogenous covariates, and analysis of samples of networks are discussed. An example is provided using the largest AddHealth school network to demonstrate how the framework can be applied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociological Methods & Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociological Methods & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241261467919\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Methods & Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241261467919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Marginal Structural Effects for Exponential Random Graph Models
Exponential random graph models (ERGMs) are now a staple for social network analysis due to their ability to parameterize effects from endogenous network structures, such as two stars and triangles. However, interpreting coefficients for structural ERGM terms poses two problems. First, it is not possible to change the value of a structural term “holding all else constant” in models with nontrivial dyadic dependencies. Second, parameters for structural ERGM terms may be affected by scaling (noncollapsibility), which can alter the direction, size, and significance of structural coefficients. While the first issue is known in the literature, the second has not been previously reported. This study introduces a methodological framework based on marginal structural effects (MSEs) to address both problems. MSEs capture the discrete marginal effect of an endogenous network structure by calculating the difference in probability when comparing two potential ties that differ only by the value of a structural term. MSEs provide an intuitive interpretation for structural network effects and are robust to the effects of scaling. Extensions to comparisons between models, interactions with exogenous covariates, and analysis of samples of networks are discussed. An example is provided using the largest AddHealth school network to demonstrate how the framework can be applied.
期刊介绍:
Sociological Methods & Research is a quarterly journal devoted to sociology as a cumulative empirical science. The objectives of SMR are multiple, but emphasis is placed on articles that advance the understanding of the field through systematic presentations that clarify methodological problems and assist in ordering the known facts in an area. Review articles will be published, particularly those that emphasize a critical analysis of the status of the arts, but original presentations that are broadly based and provide new research will also be published. Intrinsically, SMR is viewed as substantive journal but one that is highly focused on the assessment of the scientific status of sociology. The scope is broad and flexible, and authors are invited to correspond with the editors about the appropriateness of their articles.