Jeroen Dikken, Rengin Aslanoğlu, Qiuxian Li, N. Cihan Kayaçetin, Małgorzata Świąder, Grzegorz Chrobak, Aleksandra Lubańska, Jan K. Kazak, Loredana Ivan, Gabriele Masera, Carlo Andrea Biraghi, Francesco Pittau, Evgenii Mateichik, Joost van Hoof, Chiara Piccardo
{"title":"了解一般公共-专家范围内的循环知识:来自六个欧洲国家的工具开发和跨国证据","authors":"Jeroen Dikken, Rengin Aslanoğlu, Qiuxian Li, N. Cihan Kayaçetin, Małgorzata Świąder, Grzegorz Chrobak, Aleksandra Lubańska, Jan K. Kazak, Loredana Ivan, Gabriele Masera, Carlo Andrea Biraghi, Francesco Pittau, Evgenii Mateichik, Joost van Hoof, Chiara Piccardo","doi":"10.1016/j.clrc.2026.100468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Circular Economy is increasingly recognized as a multidimensional transition necessary for resource efficiency in the built environment; however, its implementation is hindered by fragmentation. This study investigates the dynamics of circularity knowledge across the public-expert spectrum using a psychometrically validated instrument supported by Item Response Theory. Empirical data were collected from the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Türkiye, Romania, and Italy, representing diverse regulatory, educational, and economic settings. The results demonstrate that circularity knowledge is not a binary paradigm but a layered, permeable continuum. While professional participation and advanced higher education are significant determinants of higher circularity literacy, the study reveals a knowledge ladder effect where entry-level higher education provides limited benefits relative to the general public's knowledge levels. The instrument demonstrates robust targeting across the population, evidenced by a strong correlation (r = 0.812) between latent proficiency and raw scores, which pinpoints a significant transition threshold at 43.3 points that separates academic preparation from verified expert-level circularity literacy. It shows that although experts are well-calibrated, groups with lower knowledge initially exhibit significantly overconfidence, which only corrects after evaluation-focused reflection. Cross-country analysis confirms structural validity of the tool as a transferable latent construct and demonstrates that specialised curriculum integration leads to knowledge convergence regardless of national origin. It concludes that systemic curriculum integration, practice-based learning, and the use of diagnostic tools to harmonize stakeholder contributions in participatory settings (e.g., Urban Living Labs) are critical levers for accelerating the transition to a circular built environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34617,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100468"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding circularity knowledge across the general public–expert spectrum: Instrument development and cross-national evidence from six European countries\",\"authors\":\"Jeroen Dikken, Rengin Aslanoğlu, Qiuxian Li, N. Cihan Kayaçetin, Małgorzata Świąder, Grzegorz Chrobak, Aleksandra Lubańska, Jan K. Kazak, Loredana Ivan, Gabriele Masera, Carlo Andrea Biraghi, Francesco Pittau, Evgenii Mateichik, Joost van Hoof, Chiara Piccardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clrc.2026.100468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Circular Economy is increasingly recognized as a multidimensional transition necessary for resource efficiency in the built environment; however, its implementation is hindered by fragmentation. This study investigates the dynamics of circularity knowledge across the public-expert spectrum using a psychometrically validated instrument supported by Item Response Theory. Empirical data were collected from the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Türkiye, Romania, and Italy, representing diverse regulatory, educational, and economic settings. The results demonstrate that circularity knowledge is not a binary paradigm but a layered, permeable continuum. While professional participation and advanced higher education are significant determinants of higher circularity literacy, the study reveals a knowledge ladder effect where entry-level higher education provides limited benefits relative to the general public's knowledge levels. The instrument demonstrates robust targeting across the population, evidenced by a strong correlation (r = 0.812) between latent proficiency and raw scores, which pinpoints a significant transition threshold at 43.3 points that separates academic preparation from verified expert-level circularity literacy. It shows that although experts are well-calibrated, groups with lower knowledge initially exhibit significantly overconfidence, which only corrects after evaluation-focused reflection. Cross-country analysis confirms structural validity of the tool as a transferable latent construct and demonstrates that specialised curriculum integration leads to knowledge convergence regardless of national origin. It concludes that systemic curriculum integration, practice-based learning, and the use of diagnostic tools to harmonize stakeholder contributions in participatory settings (e.g., Urban Living Labs) are critical levers for accelerating the transition to a circular built environment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784326000823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784326000823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding circularity knowledge across the general public–expert spectrum: Instrument development and cross-national evidence from six European countries
Circular Economy is increasingly recognized as a multidimensional transition necessary for resource efficiency in the built environment; however, its implementation is hindered by fragmentation. This study investigates the dynamics of circularity knowledge across the public-expert spectrum using a psychometrically validated instrument supported by Item Response Theory. Empirical data were collected from the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Türkiye, Romania, and Italy, representing diverse regulatory, educational, and economic settings. The results demonstrate that circularity knowledge is not a binary paradigm but a layered, permeable continuum. While professional participation and advanced higher education are significant determinants of higher circularity literacy, the study reveals a knowledge ladder effect where entry-level higher education provides limited benefits relative to the general public's knowledge levels. The instrument demonstrates robust targeting across the population, evidenced by a strong correlation (r = 0.812) between latent proficiency and raw scores, which pinpoints a significant transition threshold at 43.3 points that separates academic preparation from verified expert-level circularity literacy. It shows that although experts are well-calibrated, groups with lower knowledge initially exhibit significantly overconfidence, which only corrects after evaluation-focused reflection. Cross-country analysis confirms structural validity of the tool as a transferable latent construct and demonstrates that specialised curriculum integration leads to knowledge convergence regardless of national origin. It concludes that systemic curriculum integration, practice-based learning, and the use of diagnostic tools to harmonize stakeholder contributions in participatory settings (e.g., Urban Living Labs) are critical levers for accelerating the transition to a circular built environment.