Pham Thai Binh, Trang Thi Thuy Nguyen, Hector Sala
{"title":"谁来承担经济增长带来的碳负担?经合组织经济体的小组分析","authors":"Pham Thai Binh, Trang Thi Thuy Nguyen, Hector Sala","doi":"10.1016/j.clrc.2026.100472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Who bears the carbon burden of economic growth? This paper introduces the Distributional Environmental Kuznets Curve (DEKC), a framework that extends the traditional EKC to examine the dynamics of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions inequality between the top 10% and bottom 50% of the income distribution. Using panel data from 38 OECD countries over 1980–2023, we apply a battery of panel cointegration methods to estimate long-run relationships and derive three testable predictions from the model's distributional structure. The analysis confirms a robust inverted U-shaped relationship between per capita income and emissions inequality, with a turning point of approximately USD 108,000 (2015 prices) in the preferred specification. Beyond this baseline, three conditioning factors are identified: consumption heterogeneity amplifies the income–emissions inequality nexus (Prediction A); a larger middle class buffers the distributional impact of investment (Prediction B); and high-inequality countries exhibit steeper DEKC trajectories, reaching turning points at lower income levels (Prediction C). Investment is positively associated with emissions inequality, while trade openness and urbanization exert mitigating long-run effects. Carbon intensity deepens inequality, underscoring the distributional consequences of energy system composition. These findings indicate that growth alone does not resolve unequal carbon burdens, and that distributional structure — consumption patterns, middle-class size, and initial inequality — materially shapes the trajectory of emissions disparities during development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34617,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100472"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who bears the carbon burden of growth? A panel analysis for OECD economies\",\"authors\":\"Pham Thai Binh, Trang Thi Thuy Nguyen, Hector Sala\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clrc.2026.100472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Who bears the carbon burden of economic growth? This paper introduces the Distributional Environmental Kuznets Curve (DEKC), a framework that extends the traditional EKC to examine the dynamics of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions inequality between the top 10% and bottom 50% of the income distribution. Using panel data from 38 OECD countries over 1980–2023, we apply a battery of panel cointegration methods to estimate long-run relationships and derive three testable predictions from the model's distributional structure. The analysis confirms a robust inverted U-shaped relationship between per capita income and emissions inequality, with a turning point of approximately USD 108,000 (2015 prices) in the preferred specification. Beyond this baseline, three conditioning factors are identified: consumption heterogeneity amplifies the income–emissions inequality nexus (Prediction A); a larger middle class buffers the distributional impact of investment (Prediction B); and high-inequality countries exhibit steeper DEKC trajectories, reaching turning points at lower income levels (Prediction C). Investment is positively associated with emissions inequality, while trade openness and urbanization exert mitigating long-run effects. Carbon intensity deepens inequality, underscoring the distributional consequences of energy system composition. These findings indicate that growth alone does not resolve unequal carbon burdens, and that distributional structure — consumption patterns, middle-class size, and initial inequality — materially shapes the trajectory of emissions disparities during development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784326000860\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/7/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784326000860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Who bears the carbon burden of growth? A panel analysis for OECD economies
Who bears the carbon burden of economic growth? This paper introduces the Distributional Environmental Kuznets Curve (DEKC), a framework that extends the traditional EKC to examine the dynamics of CO2 emissions inequality between the top 10% and bottom 50% of the income distribution. Using panel data from 38 OECD countries over 1980–2023, we apply a battery of panel cointegration methods to estimate long-run relationships and derive three testable predictions from the model's distributional structure. The analysis confirms a robust inverted U-shaped relationship between per capita income and emissions inequality, with a turning point of approximately USD 108,000 (2015 prices) in the preferred specification. Beyond this baseline, three conditioning factors are identified: consumption heterogeneity amplifies the income–emissions inequality nexus (Prediction A); a larger middle class buffers the distributional impact of investment (Prediction B); and high-inequality countries exhibit steeper DEKC trajectories, reaching turning points at lower income levels (Prediction C). Investment is positively associated with emissions inequality, while trade openness and urbanization exert mitigating long-run effects. Carbon intensity deepens inequality, underscoring the distributional consequences of energy system composition. These findings indicate that growth alone does not resolve unequal carbon burdens, and that distributional structure — consumption patterns, middle-class size, and initial inequality — materially shapes the trajectory of emissions disparities during development.