电池研究用XPS分析中锂盐的降解和形态

IF 19.3 1区 材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Weilai Yu, Zhiao Yu, Yi Cui and Zhenan Bao*, 
{"title":"电池研究用XPS分析中锂盐的降解和形态","authors":"Weilai Yu,&nbsp;Zhiao Yu,&nbsp;Yi Cui and Zhenan Bao*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is one of the most common techniques to characterize the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) in battery research. However, residual salt or solvent can produce spectroscopic artifacts that complicate the evaluation of actual SEI chemistry. Herein, we present a systematic XPS study of three different Li salts, namely lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), and lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF<sub>6</sub>). A side-by-side comparison reveals that the binding energies of constituent elements sensitively shift in response to their distinct chemical environments. Strikingly, all three Li salts consistently transformed into LiF under Ar<sup>+</sup> sputtering, pointing out the importance of complete salt removal before XPS analysis. Residue from organic solvent or impurities from sample surface to bulk were found specific to the solvent–salt combination, which should be distinguished from the real organic SEI. Overall, this set of benchmark studies not only offers a valuable reference for peak assignment but also emphasizes the significance of control experiments to avoid potential pitfalls while identifying actual SEI components.</p>","PeriodicalId":16,"journal":{"name":"ACS Energy Letters ","volume":"7 10","pages":"3270–3275"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Degradation and Speciation of Li Salts during XPS Analysis for Battery Research\",\"authors\":\"Weilai Yu,&nbsp;Zhiao Yu,&nbsp;Yi Cui and Zhenan Bao*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is one of the most common techniques to characterize the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) in battery research. However, residual salt or solvent can produce spectroscopic artifacts that complicate the evaluation of actual SEI chemistry. Herein, we present a systematic XPS study of three different Li salts, namely lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), and lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF<sub>6</sub>). A side-by-side comparison reveals that the binding energies of constituent elements sensitively shift in response to their distinct chemical environments. Strikingly, all three Li salts consistently transformed into LiF under Ar<sup>+</sup> sputtering, pointing out the importance of complete salt removal before XPS analysis. Residue from organic solvent or impurities from sample surface to bulk were found specific to the solvent–salt combination, which should be distinguished from the real organic SEI. Overall, this set of benchmark studies not only offers a valuable reference for peak assignment but also emphasizes the significance of control experiments to avoid potential pitfalls while identifying actual SEI components.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Energy Letters \",\"volume\":\"7 10\",\"pages\":\"3270–3275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Energy Letters \",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01587\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Energy Letters ","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01587","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

x射线光电子能谱(XPS)是电池研究中最常用的固体-电解质间相(SEI)表征技术之一。然而,残留的盐或溶剂会产生光谱伪影,使实际SEI化学评价复杂化。在这里,我们提出了一个系统的XPS研究三种不同的锂盐,即锂二(氟磺酰基)亚胺(LiFSI),锂二(三氟甲磺酰基)亚胺(LiTFSI)和锂六氟磷酸(LiPF6)。并排比较表明,组成元素的结合能敏感地变化,以响应其不同的化学环境。引人注目的是,在Ar+溅射下,所有三种Li盐都一致转化为LiF,这指出了在XPS分析之前完全脱盐的重要性。有机溶剂残留或从样品表面到样品本体的杂质是溶剂-盐组合特有的,应与真正的有机SEI相区别。总的来说,这组基准研究不仅为峰值分配提供了有价值的参考,而且强调了控制实验在识别实际SEI成分时避免潜在缺陷的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Degradation and Speciation of Li Salts during XPS Analysis for Battery Research

Degradation and Speciation of Li Salts during XPS Analysis for Battery Research

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is one of the most common techniques to characterize the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) in battery research. However, residual salt or solvent can produce spectroscopic artifacts that complicate the evaluation of actual SEI chemistry. Herein, we present a systematic XPS study of three different Li salts, namely lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI), and lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6). A side-by-side comparison reveals that the binding energies of constituent elements sensitively shift in response to their distinct chemical environments. Strikingly, all three Li salts consistently transformed into LiF under Ar+ sputtering, pointing out the importance of complete salt removal before XPS analysis. Residue from organic solvent or impurities from sample surface to bulk were found specific to the solvent–salt combination, which should be distinguished from the real organic SEI. Overall, this set of benchmark studies not only offers a valuable reference for peak assignment but also emphasizes the significance of control experiments to avoid potential pitfalls while identifying actual SEI components.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Energy Letters
ACS Energy Letters Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
469
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: ACS Energy Letters is a monthly journal that publishes papers reporting new scientific advances in energy research. The journal focuses on topics that are of interest to scientists working in the fundamental and applied sciences. Rapid publication is a central criterion for acceptance, and the journal is known for its quick publication times, with an average of 4-6 weeks from submission to web publication in As Soon As Publishable format. ACS Energy Letters is ranked as the number one journal in the Web of Science Electrochemistry category. It also ranks within the top 10 journals for Physical Chemistry, Energy & Fuels, and Nanoscience & Nanotechnology. The journal offers several types of articles, including Letters, Energy Express, Perspectives, Reviews, Editorials, Viewpoints and Energy Focus. Additionally, authors have the option to submit videos that summarize or support the information presented in a Perspective or Review article, which can be highlighted on the journal's website. ACS Energy Letters is abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts Service/SciFinder, EBSCO-summon, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Portico.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信