成人ICU患者持续血糖监测:临床疗效荟萃分析

IF 2.1
Tingkui Fu, Lianhua Ma, Xiuqin Wu
{"title":"成人ICU患者持续血糖监测:临床疗效荟萃分析","authors":"Tingkui Fu, Lianhua Ma, Xiuqin Wu","doi":"10.1177/10998004261470782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critically ill patients often suffer from disrupted glucose metabolism, and well-managed blood glucose is a key determinant of clinical outcomes. While continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is regarded as a viable alternative, its overall effectiveness in adult ICU patients remains controversial. This study aims to conduct a systematic evaluation on the effects of CGM versus conventional intermittent blood glucose monitoring on glycemic management among adult critically ill patients in ICUs. Literature searches were carried out across seven electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data and VIP, from database inception up to May 18, 2026. Included studies were RCTs that compared CGM with conventional intermittent glucose monitoring in adult ICU patients. A total of 22 eligible RCTs with 1,396 enrolled patients were incorporated into the meta-analysis. The pooled estimates showed that CGM was associated with a significant reduction in hypoglycemic events (RR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.31-0.54, I<sup>2</sup> = 24.9%) and average blood glucose levels (MD = -0.34 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.13, I<sup>2</sup> = 68.3%). The intervention also prolonged time in glycemic target range (MD = 10.12%, 95% CI: 6.03%-14.21%, I<sup>2</sup> = 67.5%), cut down daily insulin use (MD = -22.17 U/day, 95% CI: -26.82 to -17.52, I<sup>2</sup> = 37.7%), and reduced total mortality (RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.65, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%). Our results suggest integrating CGM into routine ICU glycemic control strategies, particularly for patients with severe glycemic variability and high hypoglycemia risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":93901,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":" ","pages":"10998004261470782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Adult ICU Patients: A Meta-Analysis on Its Clinical Effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Tingkui Fu, Lianhua Ma, Xiuqin Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10998004261470782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Critically ill patients often suffer from disrupted glucose metabolism, and well-managed blood glucose is a key determinant of clinical outcomes. While continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is regarded as a viable alternative, its overall effectiveness in adult ICU patients remains controversial. This study aims to conduct a systematic evaluation on the effects of CGM versus conventional intermittent blood glucose monitoring on glycemic management among adult critically ill patients in ICUs. Literature searches were carried out across seven electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data and VIP, from database inception up to May 18, 2026. Included studies were RCTs that compared CGM with conventional intermittent glucose monitoring in adult ICU patients. A total of 22 eligible RCTs with 1,396 enrolled patients were incorporated into the meta-analysis. The pooled estimates showed that CGM was associated with a significant reduction in hypoglycemic events (RR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.31-0.54, I<sup>2</sup> = 24.9%) and average blood glucose levels (MD = -0.34 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.13, I<sup>2</sup> = 68.3%). The intervention also prolonged time in glycemic target range (MD = 10.12%, 95% CI: 6.03%-14.21%, I<sup>2</sup> = 67.5%), cut down daily insulin use (MD = -22.17 U/day, 95% CI: -26.82 to -17.52, I<sup>2</sup> = 37.7%), and reduced total mortality (RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.65, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%). Our results suggest integrating CGM into routine ICU glycemic control strategies, particularly for patients with severe glycemic variability and high hypoglycemia risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10998004261470782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004261470782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004261470782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

危重患者经常遭受糖代谢紊乱,良好的血糖管理是临床结果的关键决定因素。虽然连续血糖监测(CGM)被认为是一种可行的替代方法,但其在成人ICU患者中的总体有效性仍存在争议。本研究旨在系统评价CGM与常规间歇血糖监测对icu成人危重患者血糖管理的影响。文献检索时间为PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI、万方数据、VIP等7个电子数据库,检索时间为数据库建立至2026年5月18日。纳入的研究是比较CGM与常规间歇血糖监测的成人ICU患者的随机对照试验。共有22项符合条件的随机对照试验纳入了1396名入组患者。综合估计显示,CGM与低血糖事件的显著减少(RR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.31-0.54, I2 = 24.9%)和平均血糖水平(MD = -0.34 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.55 - -0.13, I2 = 68.3%)相关。干预还延长了血糖目标范围的时间(MD = 10.12%, 95% CI: 6.03% ~ 14.21%, I2 = 67.5%),减少了每日胰岛素使用量(MD = -22.17 U/天,95% CI: -26.82 ~ -17.52, I2 = 37.7%),降低了总死亡率(RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34 ~ 0.65, I2 = 0.0%)。我们的研究结果建议将CGM纳入常规ICU血糖控制策略,特别是对于血糖变异性严重和低血糖风险高的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Adult ICU Patients: A Meta-Analysis on Its Clinical Effectiveness.

Critically ill patients often suffer from disrupted glucose metabolism, and well-managed blood glucose is a key determinant of clinical outcomes. While continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is regarded as a viable alternative, its overall effectiveness in adult ICU patients remains controversial. This study aims to conduct a systematic evaluation on the effects of CGM versus conventional intermittent blood glucose monitoring on glycemic management among adult critically ill patients in ICUs. Literature searches were carried out across seven electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data and VIP, from database inception up to May 18, 2026. Included studies were RCTs that compared CGM with conventional intermittent glucose monitoring in adult ICU patients. A total of 22 eligible RCTs with 1,396 enrolled patients were incorporated into the meta-analysis. The pooled estimates showed that CGM was associated with a significant reduction in hypoglycemic events (RR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.31-0.54, I2 = 24.9%) and average blood glucose levels (MD = -0.34 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.13, I2 = 68.3%). The intervention also prolonged time in glycemic target range (MD = 10.12%, 95% CI: 6.03%-14.21%, I2 = 67.5%), cut down daily insulin use (MD = -22.17 U/day, 95% CI: -26.82 to -17.52, I2 = 37.7%), and reduced total mortality (RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.65, I2 = 0.0%). Our results suggest integrating CGM into routine ICU glycemic control strategies, particularly for patients with severe glycemic variability and high hypoglycemia risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书