视觉加工的横向差异:相对与专属半球专门化。

Human neurobiology Pub Date : 1986-01-01
R Bruyer
{"title":"视觉加工的横向差异:相对与专属半球专门化。","authors":"R Bruyer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In some cases, lateral differences reveal cerebral hemispheric asymmetry in cognitive operations. Such asymmetry can indicate the absolute dominance of one hemisphere, the \"dominant\" hemisphere managing the task whatever the hemisphere of entry. Consequently, a commissural transfer is needed for stimuli sent to the non-dominance as only relative: the hemisphere receiving the stimulus is able to manage it, but the dominant one can do it more accurately and/or faster than the other. These two models should be able to be distinguished by means of a correlational study and a study of the stimulated hemifield X responding hand interaction. The latter is based on the assumption of contralateral control of slight distal movements. These two methods were applied to data derived from 24 right-handed normals who were given three tasks for which right visual field superiority was expected: word/non-word discrimination, vowel/consonant classification of letters, and odd/even categorization of numbers. The stimuli were displayed centrally or laterally for 150 ms. The data indicated that the right-field superiority for words resulted from a relative dominance, that the right-field advantage for numbers resulted from an absolute dominance, and that no asymmetry emerged for letters.</p>","PeriodicalId":77724,"journal":{"name":"Human neurobiology","volume":"5 2","pages":"83-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral differences in visual processing: relative vs exclusive hemispheric specialization.\",\"authors\":\"R Bruyer\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In some cases, lateral differences reveal cerebral hemispheric asymmetry in cognitive operations. Such asymmetry can indicate the absolute dominance of one hemisphere, the \\\"dominant\\\" hemisphere managing the task whatever the hemisphere of entry. Consequently, a commissural transfer is needed for stimuli sent to the non-dominance as only relative: the hemisphere receiving the stimulus is able to manage it, but the dominant one can do it more accurately and/or faster than the other. These two models should be able to be distinguished by means of a correlational study and a study of the stimulated hemifield X responding hand interaction. The latter is based on the assumption of contralateral control of slight distal movements. These two methods were applied to data derived from 24 right-handed normals who were given three tasks for which right visual field superiority was expected: word/non-word discrimination, vowel/consonant classification of letters, and odd/even categorization of numbers. The stimuli were displayed centrally or laterally for 150 ms. The data indicated that the right-field superiority for words resulted from a relative dominance, that the right-field advantage for numbers resulted from an absolute dominance, and that no asymmetry emerged for letters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"83-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在某些情况下,侧面差异表明大脑半球在认知操作中不对称。这种不对称可以表明一个半球的绝对主导地位,“主导”半球管理任务,无论进入哪个半球。因此,将刺激发送给非支配性的半球需要一个互交转移,因为这只是相对的:接受刺激的半球能够管理它,但支配性的半球可以比另一个半球更准确和/或更快地完成它。这两种模型应该能够通过相关研究和受激半场X响应手相互作用的研究来区分。后者是基于对侧控制轻微远端运动的假设。这两种方法应用于24名右撇子正常人的数据,他们被要求完成三个任务:单词/非单词区分、字母的元音/辅音分类和数字的奇数/偶数分类。刺激在中央或侧面显示150毫秒。数据表明,右外场对单词的优势来自相对优势,右外场对数字的优势来自绝对优势,而字母没有出现不对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lateral differences in visual processing: relative vs exclusive hemispheric specialization.

In some cases, lateral differences reveal cerebral hemispheric asymmetry in cognitive operations. Such asymmetry can indicate the absolute dominance of one hemisphere, the "dominant" hemisphere managing the task whatever the hemisphere of entry. Consequently, a commissural transfer is needed for stimuli sent to the non-dominance as only relative: the hemisphere receiving the stimulus is able to manage it, but the dominant one can do it more accurately and/or faster than the other. These two models should be able to be distinguished by means of a correlational study and a study of the stimulated hemifield X responding hand interaction. The latter is based on the assumption of contralateral control of slight distal movements. These two methods were applied to data derived from 24 right-handed normals who were given three tasks for which right visual field superiority was expected: word/non-word discrimination, vowel/consonant classification of letters, and odd/even categorization of numbers. The stimuli were displayed centrally or laterally for 150 ms. The data indicated that the right-field superiority for words resulted from a relative dominance, that the right-field advantage for numbers resulted from an absolute dominance, and that no asymmetry emerged for letters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信