TCR表位标注与模式发现的机器学习。

IF 10.6 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Romi Vandoren, Vincent Van Deuren, Fabio Affaticati, Sofie Gielis, Kris Laukens, Pieter Meysman
{"title":"TCR表位标注与模式发现的机器学习。","authors":"Romi Vandoren,&nbsp;Vincent Van Deuren,&nbsp;Fabio Affaticati,&nbsp;Sofie Gielis,&nbsp;Kris Laukens,&nbsp;Pieter Meysman","doi":"10.1111/imr.70143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>T cells are central to adaptive immunity, recognizing antigenic peptides, called epitopes, via the T cell receptor (TCR). The immense diversity and cross-reactivity of the TCR repertoire makes direct interpretation of antigen specificity from repertoire sequencing challenging. High-throughput sequencing enables large-scale profiling of TCRs but does not directly reveal their target epitopes, requiring computational approaches to bridge this gap. This review outlines two complementary strategies, bottom-up and top-down approaches, to annotate TCR specificity. Bottom-up methods predict TCR-epitope specificity from curated TCR-epitope databases, identifying recurring patterns through distance-based, feature-based, or deep learning models. While effective for well-characterized epitopes, they are limited by biased training data, absence of negative data, and weak generalization to unseen epitopes. Top-down approaches instead infer antigen-driven responses from repertoire-level signals such as sequence similarity, enrichment, and TCR convergence. These methods enable discovery of disease- or exposure-associated TCR signatures without prior epitope knowledge but are sensitive to technical noise and biological confounding. Both approaches are complementary as bottom-up provides mechanistic specificity, while top-down enables discovery in complex datasets. Their integration, alongside multimodal modeling and improved benchmarking, is key to advancing TCR-epitope annotation and understanding adaptive immune responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":178,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Reviews","volume":"340 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13381816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning for TCR Repertoire Epitope Annotation and Pattern Discovery\",\"authors\":\"Romi Vandoren,&nbsp;Vincent Van Deuren,&nbsp;Fabio Affaticati,&nbsp;Sofie Gielis,&nbsp;Kris Laukens,&nbsp;Pieter Meysman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imr.70143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>T cells are central to adaptive immunity, recognizing antigenic peptides, called epitopes, via the T cell receptor (TCR). The immense diversity and cross-reactivity of the TCR repertoire makes direct interpretation of antigen specificity from repertoire sequencing challenging. High-throughput sequencing enables large-scale profiling of TCRs but does not directly reveal their target epitopes, requiring computational approaches to bridge this gap. This review outlines two complementary strategies, bottom-up and top-down approaches, to annotate TCR specificity. Bottom-up methods predict TCR-epitope specificity from curated TCR-epitope databases, identifying recurring patterns through distance-based, feature-based, or deep learning models. While effective for well-characterized epitopes, they are limited by biased training data, absence of negative data, and weak generalization to unseen epitopes. Top-down approaches instead infer antigen-driven responses from repertoire-level signals such as sequence similarity, enrichment, and TCR convergence. These methods enable discovery of disease- or exposure-associated TCR signatures without prior epitope knowledge but are sensitive to technical noise and biological confounding. Both approaches are complementary as bottom-up provides mechanistic specificity, while top-down enables discovery in complex datasets. Their integration, alongside multimodal modeling and improved benchmarking, is key to advancing TCR-epitope annotation and understanding adaptive immune responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunological Reviews\",\"volume\":\"340 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13381816/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imr.70143\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/imr.70143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

T细胞是适应性免疫的核心,通过T细胞受体(TCR)识别抗原肽,称为表位。TCR库的巨大多样性和交叉反应性使得从库测序中直接解释抗原特异性具有挑战性。高通量测序能够对tcr进行大规模分析,但不能直接揭示其目标表位,这需要计算方法来弥补这一差距。本综述概述了两种互补的策略,自下而上和自上而下的方法,以注释TCR特异性。自下而上的方法预测tcr表位特异性从策划tcr表位数据库,识别重复模式,通过基于距离,基于特征,或深度学习模型。虽然对特征明确的表位有效,但它们受到训练数据偏差、缺乏负面数据以及对未见表位的弱泛化的限制。自上而下的方法是从序列相似性、富集和TCR收敛等信号中推断抗原驱动的反应。这些方法可以在没有事先表位知识的情况下发现与疾病或暴露相关的TCR特征,但对技术噪声和生物学混淆很敏感。这两种方法是互补的,因为自底向上提供了机制特异性,而自顶向下可以在复杂的数据集中进行发现。它们的整合,以及多模态建模和改进的基准,是推进tcr表位注释和理解适应性免疫反应的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Machine Learning for TCR Repertoire Epitope Annotation and Pattern Discovery

Machine Learning for TCR Repertoire Epitope Annotation and Pattern Discovery

T cells are central to adaptive immunity, recognizing antigenic peptides, called epitopes, via the T cell receptor (TCR). The immense diversity and cross-reactivity of the TCR repertoire makes direct interpretation of antigen specificity from repertoire sequencing challenging. High-throughput sequencing enables large-scale profiling of TCRs but does not directly reveal their target epitopes, requiring computational approaches to bridge this gap. This review outlines two complementary strategies, bottom-up and top-down approaches, to annotate TCR specificity. Bottom-up methods predict TCR-epitope specificity from curated TCR-epitope databases, identifying recurring patterns through distance-based, feature-based, or deep learning models. While effective for well-characterized epitopes, they are limited by biased training data, absence of negative data, and weak generalization to unseen epitopes. Top-down approaches instead infer antigen-driven responses from repertoire-level signals such as sequence similarity, enrichment, and TCR convergence. These methods enable discovery of disease- or exposure-associated TCR signatures without prior epitope knowledge but are sensitive to technical noise and biological confounding. Both approaches are complementary as bottom-up provides mechanistic specificity, while top-down enables discovery in complex datasets. Their integration, alongside multimodal modeling and improved benchmarking, is key to advancing TCR-epitope annotation and understanding adaptive immune responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunological Reviews
Immunological Reviews 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.10%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Immunological Reviews is a specialized journal that focuses on various aspects of immunological research. It encompasses a wide range of topics, such as clinical immunology, experimental immunology, and investigations related to allergy and the immune system. The journal follows a unique approach where each volume is dedicated solely to a specific area of immunological research. However, collectively, these volumes aim to offer an extensive and up-to-date overview of the latest advancements in basic immunology and their practical implications in clinical settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书