基于脑电图的多类别痴呆分类的深度模型族。

IF 6.4
International journal of neural systems Pub Date : 2027-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-16 DOI:10.1142/S0129065727500055
Soner Kotan, Aydin Akan
{"title":"基于脑电图的多类别痴呆分类的深度模型族。","authors":"Soner Kotan, Aydin Akan","doi":"10.1142/S0129065727500055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep learning (DL) has shown considerable promise for EEG-based dementia assessment; however, rigorous cross-family comparisons under leakage-free and clinically meaningful evaluation protocols remain limited. To address this gap, we benchmarked twelve DL architectures from four major families - recurrent neural networks (RNNs), temporal convolutional networks (TCNs), Transformers, and self-supervised learning (SSL) - for the multi-class differentiation of Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and healthy controls (HC). The analysis was conducted on a clinically acquired EEG dataset comprising 36 AD patients, 23 FTD patients, and 29[Formula: see text]HC participants. To prevent subject-level data leakage, we employed strict subject-independent five-fold cross-validation, and to improve clinical relevance, final predictions were aggregated at the subject level using majority voting across EEG segments. Model performance was evaluated using classification metrics, learning stability, statistical ranking, computational efficiency, and interpretability analysis. Among all benchmarked architectures, the self-supervised SimCLR-Time framework achieved the strongest subject-level performance, reaching a mean accuracy of [Formula: see text] and a weighted <i>F</i>1-score of [Formula: see text]. The time-series transformer (TST) was the best-performing fully supervised model, with an accuracy of [Formula: see text], followed closely by the hybrid LSTM-FCN model at [Formula: see text]. In contrast, the EEG-Seq2Seq model showed the weakest performance ([Formula: see text]). Computational profiling further showed that TCN-Attention offered a favorable trade-off between accuracy and edge-oriented efficiency, while SimCLR-Time combined strong diagnostic performance with the fastest inference latency. In addition, Integrated Gradients-based saliency analysis suggested that the top-performing model relied on structured spatiotemporal EEG patterns rather than arbitrary temporal artifacts. Overall, these findings provide a controlled within-dataset benchmark for multi-class dementia classification from raw EEG and suggest that self-supervised and attention-based architectures are promising directions for clinically oriented EEG decision-support systems. However, external validation on larger and more heterogeneous cohorts remains necessary before broader generalization can be claimed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94052,"journal":{"name":"International journal of neural systems","volume":" ","pages":"2750005"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2027-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Model Families for EEG-Based Multi-Class Dementia Classification.\",\"authors\":\"Soner Kotan, Aydin Akan\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S0129065727500055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Deep learning (DL) has shown considerable promise for EEG-based dementia assessment; however, rigorous cross-family comparisons under leakage-free and clinically meaningful evaluation protocols remain limited. To address this gap, we benchmarked twelve DL architectures from four major families - recurrent neural networks (RNNs), temporal convolutional networks (TCNs), Transformers, and self-supervised learning (SSL) - for the multi-class differentiation of Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and healthy controls (HC). The analysis was conducted on a clinically acquired EEG dataset comprising 36 AD patients, 23 FTD patients, and 29[Formula: see text]HC participants. To prevent subject-level data leakage, we employed strict subject-independent five-fold cross-validation, and to improve clinical relevance, final predictions were aggregated at the subject level using majority voting across EEG segments. Model performance was evaluated using classification metrics, learning stability, statistical ranking, computational efficiency, and interpretability analysis. Among all benchmarked architectures, the self-supervised SimCLR-Time framework achieved the strongest subject-level performance, reaching a mean accuracy of [Formula: see text] and a weighted <i>F</i>1-score of [Formula: see text]. The time-series transformer (TST) was the best-performing fully supervised model, with an accuracy of [Formula: see text], followed closely by the hybrid LSTM-FCN model at [Formula: see text]. In contrast, the EEG-Seq2Seq model showed the weakest performance ([Formula: see text]). Computational profiling further showed that TCN-Attention offered a favorable trade-off between accuracy and edge-oriented efficiency, while SimCLR-Time combined strong diagnostic performance with the fastest inference latency. In addition, Integrated Gradients-based saliency analysis suggested that the top-performing model relied on structured spatiotemporal EEG patterns rather than arbitrary temporal artifacts. Overall, these findings provide a controlled within-dataset benchmark for multi-class dementia classification from raw EEG and suggest that self-supervised and attention-based architectures are promising directions for clinically oriented EEG decision-support systems. However, external validation on larger and more heterogeneous cohorts remains necessary before broader generalization can be claimed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of neural systems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2750005\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2027-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of neural systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065727500055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/7/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of neural systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065727500055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深度学习(DL)在基于脑电图的痴呆症评估方面显示出相当大的前景;然而,在无渗漏和有临床意义的评估方案下,严格的跨家族比较仍然有限。为了解决这一差距,我们对来自四个主要家族的12种深度学习架构进行了基准测试——递归神经网络(rnn)、颞叶卷积网络(TCNs)、变形神经网络和自监督学习(SSL)——用于阿尔茨海默病(AD)、额颞叶痴呆(FTD)和健康对照(HC)的多类别分化。对临床获得的脑电数据集进行分析,该数据集包括36例AD患者、23例FTD患者和29例HC参与者。为了防止受试者水平的数据泄露,我们采用了严格的受试者独立的五重交叉验证,为了提高临床相关性,最终预测在受试者水平上使用脑电图段的多数投票进行汇总。通过分类指标、学习稳定性、统计排名、计算效率和可解释性分析来评估模型的性能。在所有基准体系结构中,自监督的SimCLR-Time框架取得了最强的学科级性能,达到了[公式:见文本]的平均准确率和[公式:见文本]的加权f1分数。时间序列变压器(TST)是表现最好的全监督模型,其精度为[公式:见文],紧随其后的是混合LSTM-FCN模型[公式:见文]。相比之下,EEG-Seq2Seq模型表现最差([公式:见文])。计算分析进一步表明,TCN-Attention在准确性和边缘导向效率之间提供了良好的权衡,而SimCLR-Time则结合了强大的诊断性能和最快的推理延迟。此外,基于集成梯度的显著性分析表明,表现最好的模型依赖于结构化的时空脑电模式,而不是任意的时间伪影。总的来说,这些发现为原始脑电图的多类别痴呆分类提供了一个可控的数据集内基准,并表明自我监督和基于注意力的架构是面向临床的脑电图决策支持系统的有希望的方向。然而,在更广泛的推广之前,仍然需要对更大、更异构的队列进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Model Families for EEG-Based Multi-Class Dementia Classification.

Deep learning (DL) has shown considerable promise for EEG-based dementia assessment; however, rigorous cross-family comparisons under leakage-free and clinically meaningful evaluation protocols remain limited. To address this gap, we benchmarked twelve DL architectures from four major families - recurrent neural networks (RNNs), temporal convolutional networks (TCNs), Transformers, and self-supervised learning (SSL) - for the multi-class differentiation of Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and healthy controls (HC). The analysis was conducted on a clinically acquired EEG dataset comprising 36 AD patients, 23 FTD patients, and 29[Formula: see text]HC participants. To prevent subject-level data leakage, we employed strict subject-independent five-fold cross-validation, and to improve clinical relevance, final predictions were aggregated at the subject level using majority voting across EEG segments. Model performance was evaluated using classification metrics, learning stability, statistical ranking, computational efficiency, and interpretability analysis. Among all benchmarked architectures, the self-supervised SimCLR-Time framework achieved the strongest subject-level performance, reaching a mean accuracy of [Formula: see text] and a weighted F1-score of [Formula: see text]. The time-series transformer (TST) was the best-performing fully supervised model, with an accuracy of [Formula: see text], followed closely by the hybrid LSTM-FCN model at [Formula: see text]. In contrast, the EEG-Seq2Seq model showed the weakest performance ([Formula: see text]). Computational profiling further showed that TCN-Attention offered a favorable trade-off between accuracy and edge-oriented efficiency, while SimCLR-Time combined strong diagnostic performance with the fastest inference latency. In addition, Integrated Gradients-based saliency analysis suggested that the top-performing model relied on structured spatiotemporal EEG patterns rather than arbitrary temporal artifacts. Overall, these findings provide a controlled within-dataset benchmark for multi-class dementia classification from raw EEG and suggest that self-supervised and attention-based architectures are promising directions for clinically oriented EEG decision-support systems. However, external validation on larger and more heterogeneous cohorts remains necessary before broader generalization can be claimed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书