瑞西奎特治疗早期肺血管疾病(ESRA)的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的IIa期试验

IF 9.8 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2026-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2026.06.053
Panagiota Xanthouli,Nicola Benjamin,Gerry Coghlan,Christopher P Denton,Philipp Douschan,Éric Hachulla,Michael Halank,Melanie Heberling,Gabor Kovacs,Mona Lichtblau,Alberto M Marra,Regina Steringer-Mascherbauer,Silvia Ulrich,Ekkehard Grünig,
{"title":"瑞西奎特治疗早期肺血管疾病(ESRA)的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的IIa期试验","authors":"Panagiota Xanthouli,Nicola Benjamin,Gerry Coghlan,Christopher P Denton,Philipp Douschan,Éric Hachulla,Michael Halank,Melanie Heberling,Gabor Kovacs,Mona Lichtblau,Alberto M Marra,Regina Steringer-Mascherbauer,Silvia Ulrich,Ekkehard Grünig, ","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2026.06.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapies have not been systematically studied in early disease stages, despite potential benefit.\r\n\r\nRESEARCH QUESTION\r\nIs riociguat safe, well tolerated, and potentially effective in early pulmonary vascular disease (PVD)?\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN AND METHODS\r\nIn this prospective, multicenter, double-blind phase IIa trial adults with early pulmonary vascular disease, defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg with pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≥2 - <3 Wood Units (WU), or mPAP 21 - <25 mmHg with PVR ≥2 WU, were randomized and received 1:1 riociguat or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in PVR from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints, evaluated hierarchically, comprised changes in cardiac index, total pulmonary resistance, diffusing capacity of the lung, six-minute walking distance, WHO functional class, quality of life (QoL). Complementary parameters were analyzed in an exploratory manner. Safety was monitored throughout.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 261 pre-screened patients, 35 eligible patients were randomized (97% female, 65.5±6.9 years; 77.1% connective tissue disease-associated PAH); 32 completed the trial. Reasons for ineligibility were documented. Riociguat significantly improved the primary endpoint PVR (riociguat -0.73±0.67 WU vs. placebo -0.02±0.67 WU, p=0.043; 27% placebo-adjusted reduction). No significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints. Of exploratory endpoints, only cardiac output showed a trend toward improvement under riociguat (0.35±0.86 l/min vs. placebo -0.19 ±0.75 l/min, p=0.084). Only mild to moderate adverse events were observed, serious events were not considered treatment related.\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nDespite the limited number of participants, treatment with riociguat was safe and significantly improved the primary endpoint PVR over 24 weeks.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION\r\nClinicaltrials.gov, NCT05339087, available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05339087.","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of riociguat in early pulmonary vascular disease (ESRA): a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial.\",\"authors\":\"Panagiota Xanthouli,Nicola Benjamin,Gerry Coghlan,Christopher P Denton,Philipp Douschan,Éric Hachulla,Michael Halank,Melanie Heberling,Gabor Kovacs,Mona Lichtblau,Alberto M Marra,Regina Steringer-Mascherbauer,Silvia Ulrich,Ekkehard Grünig, \",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2026.06.053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nPulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapies have not been systematically studied in early disease stages, despite potential benefit.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESEARCH QUESTION\\r\\nIs riociguat safe, well tolerated, and potentially effective in early pulmonary vascular disease (PVD)?\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY DESIGN AND METHODS\\r\\nIn this prospective, multicenter, double-blind phase IIa trial adults with early pulmonary vascular disease, defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg with pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≥2 - <3 Wood Units (WU), or mPAP 21 - <25 mmHg with PVR ≥2 WU, were randomized and received 1:1 riociguat or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in PVR from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints, evaluated hierarchically, comprised changes in cardiac index, total pulmonary resistance, diffusing capacity of the lung, six-minute walking distance, WHO functional class, quality of life (QoL). Complementary parameters were analyzed in an exploratory manner. Safety was monitored throughout.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nOf 261 pre-screened patients, 35 eligible patients were randomized (97% female, 65.5±6.9 years; 77.1% connective tissue disease-associated PAH); 32 completed the trial. Reasons for ineligibility were documented. Riociguat significantly improved the primary endpoint PVR (riociguat -0.73±0.67 WU vs. placebo -0.02±0.67 WU, p=0.043; 27% placebo-adjusted reduction). No significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints. Of exploratory endpoints, only cardiac output showed a trend toward improvement under riociguat (0.35±0.86 l/min vs. placebo -0.19 ±0.75 l/min, p=0.084). Only mild to moderate adverse events were observed, serious events were not considered treatment related.\\r\\n\\r\\nINTERPRETATION\\r\\nDespite the limited number of participants, treatment with riociguat was safe and significantly improved the primary endpoint PVR over 24 weeks.\\r\\n\\r\\nCLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION\\r\\nClinicaltrials.gov, NCT05339087, available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05339087.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2026.06.053\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2026.06.053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺动脉高压(PAH)治疗在疾病早期尚未进行系统研究,尽管有潜在的益处。研究问题:瑞西奎特对早期肺血管疾病(PVD)是否安全、耐受性良好并可能有效?研究设计和方法在这项前瞻性、多中心、双盲IIa期试验中,定义为平均肺动脉压(mPAP)≥25 mmHg且肺血管阻力(PVR)≥2 - <3 Wood Units (WU),或mPAP 21 - <25 mmHg且PVR≥2 WU的早期肺血管疾病成人患者被随机分组,接受1:1的瑞西格特或安慰剂治疗24周。主要终点是PVR从基线到第24周的变化。次要终点,分级评估,包括心脏指数、总肺阻力、肺弥散能力、6分钟步行距离、WHO功能分级、生活质量(QoL)的变化。对互补参数进行探索性分析。安全受到全程监控。结果在261例预先筛选的患者中,35例符合条件的患者被随机分配(97%为女性,65.5±6.9岁,77.1%为结缔组织病相关PAH);32人完成试验。不合格的理由已记录在案。利奥西瓜特显著改善了主要终点PVR(利奥西瓜特-0.73±0.67 WU vs安慰剂-0.02±0.67 WU, p=0.043;安慰剂调整后降低27%)。次要终点无显著差异。在探索性终点中,只有心输出量在riociguat组有改善的趋势(0.35±0.86 l/min vs.安慰剂组-0.19±0.75 l/min, p=0.084)。仅观察到轻度至中度不良事件,严重事件与治疗无关。尽管参与者人数有限,但瑞西奎特治疗是安全的,并且在24周内显著改善了主要终点PVR。临床试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05339087,可访问https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05339087。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of riociguat in early pulmonary vascular disease (ESRA): a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial.
BACKGROUND Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapies have not been systematically studied in early disease stages, despite potential benefit. RESEARCH QUESTION Is riociguat safe, well tolerated, and potentially effective in early pulmonary vascular disease (PVD)? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS In this prospective, multicenter, double-blind phase IIa trial adults with early pulmonary vascular disease, defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg with pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≥2 - <3 Wood Units (WU), or mPAP 21 - <25 mmHg with PVR ≥2 WU, were randomized and received 1:1 riociguat or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in PVR from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints, evaluated hierarchically, comprised changes in cardiac index, total pulmonary resistance, diffusing capacity of the lung, six-minute walking distance, WHO functional class, quality of life (QoL). Complementary parameters were analyzed in an exploratory manner. Safety was monitored throughout. RESULTS Of 261 pre-screened patients, 35 eligible patients were randomized (97% female, 65.5±6.9 years; 77.1% connective tissue disease-associated PAH); 32 completed the trial. Reasons for ineligibility were documented. Riociguat significantly improved the primary endpoint PVR (riociguat -0.73±0.67 WU vs. placebo -0.02±0.67 WU, p=0.043; 27% placebo-adjusted reduction). No significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints. Of exploratory endpoints, only cardiac output showed a trend toward improvement under riociguat (0.35±0.86 l/min vs. placebo -0.19 ±0.75 l/min, p=0.084). Only mild to moderate adverse events were observed, serious events were not considered treatment related. INTERPRETATION Despite the limited number of participants, treatment with riociguat was safe and significantly improved the primary endpoint PVR over 24 weeks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05339087, available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05339087.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书