奥斯曼塞尔维亚晚期流离失所的妇女、法律和相互竞争的父权制

IF 1.4 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Emily Greble
{"title":"奥斯曼塞尔维亚晚期流离失所的妇女、法律和相互竞争的父权制","authors":"Emily Greble","doi":"10.1093/pastj/gtag020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Focusing on women who were displaced, unclaimed, or left without protection in the shifting legal order of early nineteenth-century Ottoman Serbia— runaway wives, enslaved and manumitted women, fugitives, and kidnapped girls —this article argues that the burdens of transition into the modern state were experienced most acutely by women who fell through the cracks of overlapping spatial and legal regimes of control. Despite their varied circumstances, women shared a structural problem: they had no pathway to legal personhood, no rights to return to or leave their homes, and no protection unless recognized within a patriarchal household. Their legal belonging remained tethered to household authority even as new centralizing political and legal orders took shape. In this unstable transitional period, patriarchy was distributed and enforced across competing scales and legal structures, including households, villages, Ottoman imperial institutions, and emerging Serbian state structures. Drawing on Serbian court and administrative records from the 1820s–30s, this article traces how various local and imperial officials negotiated these tensions, suggesting that transitional legal systems inscribed gendered asymmetries into modern practices of repatriation, citizenship, trafficking, and statelessness. The article contends that modern patriarchies emerged out of early modern household-based legal regimes and systems of village authority, and that modern forms of statelessness stem from problems that became legible during transitional periods and were never resolved.","PeriodicalId":47870,"journal":{"name":"Past & Present","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Displaced women, law and competing patriarchies in late Ottoman Serbia\",\"authors\":\"Emily Greble\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pastj/gtag020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Focusing on women who were displaced, unclaimed, or left without protection in the shifting legal order of early nineteenth-century Ottoman Serbia— runaway wives, enslaved and manumitted women, fugitives, and kidnapped girls —this article argues that the burdens of transition into the modern state were experienced most acutely by women who fell through the cracks of overlapping spatial and legal regimes of control. Despite their varied circumstances, women shared a structural problem: they had no pathway to legal personhood, no rights to return to or leave their homes, and no protection unless recognized within a patriarchal household. Their legal belonging remained tethered to household authority even as new centralizing political and legal orders took shape. In this unstable transitional period, patriarchy was distributed and enforced across competing scales and legal structures, including households, villages, Ottoman imperial institutions, and emerging Serbian state structures. Drawing on Serbian court and administrative records from the 1820s–30s, this article traces how various local and imperial officials negotiated these tensions, suggesting that transitional legal systems inscribed gendered asymmetries into modern practices of repatriation, citizenship, trafficking, and statelessness. The article contends that modern patriarchies emerged out of early modern household-based legal regimes and systems of village authority, and that modern forms of statelessness stem from problems that became legible during transitional periods and were never resolved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Past & Present\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Past & Present\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtag020\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Past & Present","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtag020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在19世纪早期的奥斯曼塞尔维亚,那些在不断变化的法律秩序中流离失所、无人领领或没有得到保护的妇女——逃跑的妻子、被奴役和被解放的妇女、逃亡者和被绑架的女孩——这篇文章认为,那些在空间和法律控制制度重叠的裂缝中跌落的妇女,最深切地经历了向现代国家过渡的负担。尽管妇女的情况各不相同,但她们都有一个结构性问题:她们没有获得法律人格的途径,没有返回或离开家园的权利,除非得到父权制家庭的承认,否则得不到保护。即使新的中央集权的政治和法律秩序形成,他们的法律归属仍然束缚在家庭权力之上。在这个不稳定的过渡时期,父权制在竞争规模和法律结构中分布和执行,包括家庭、村庄、奥斯曼帝国机构和新兴的塞尔维亚国家结构。本文利用19世纪20年代至30年代的塞尔维亚法院和行政记录,追溯了不同地方和帝国官员如何处理这些紧张关系,表明过渡时期的法律体系将性别不对称纳入了遣返、公民身份、贩运和无国籍的现代实践中。文章认为,现代父权制产生于早期现代以家庭为基础的法律制度和村委会制度,现代形式的无国籍源于在过渡时期变得清晰的问题,这些问题从未得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Displaced women, law and competing patriarchies in late Ottoman Serbia
Focusing on women who were displaced, unclaimed, or left without protection in the shifting legal order of early nineteenth-century Ottoman Serbia— runaway wives, enslaved and manumitted women, fugitives, and kidnapped girls —this article argues that the burdens of transition into the modern state were experienced most acutely by women who fell through the cracks of overlapping spatial and legal regimes of control. Despite their varied circumstances, women shared a structural problem: they had no pathway to legal personhood, no rights to return to or leave their homes, and no protection unless recognized within a patriarchal household. Their legal belonging remained tethered to household authority even as new centralizing political and legal orders took shape. In this unstable transitional period, patriarchy was distributed and enforced across competing scales and legal structures, including households, villages, Ottoman imperial institutions, and emerging Serbian state structures. Drawing on Serbian court and administrative records from the 1820s–30s, this article traces how various local and imperial officials negotiated these tensions, suggesting that transitional legal systems inscribed gendered asymmetries into modern practices of repatriation, citizenship, trafficking, and statelessness. The article contends that modern patriarchies emerged out of early modern household-based legal regimes and systems of village authority, and that modern forms of statelessness stem from problems that became legible during transitional periods and were never resolved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Past & Present
Past & Present Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1952, Past & Present is widely acknowledged to be the liveliest and most stimulating historical journal in the English-speaking world. The journal offers: •A wide variety of scholarly and original articles on historical, social and cultural change in all parts of the world. •Four issues a year, each containing five or six major articles plus occasional debates and review essays. •Challenging work by young historians as well as seminal articles by internationally regarded scholars. •A range of articles that appeal to specialists and non-specialists, and communicate the results of the most recent historical research in a readable and lively form. •A forum for debate, encouraging productive controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书