Samuel M Tucker, Gregory A Lewbart, Yang Qu, Ulrich Hartmond, Julie A Balko
{"title":"纸鸢蝶麻醉技术的研究。","authors":"Samuel M Tucker, Gregory A Lewbart, Yang Qu, Ulrich Hartmond, Julie A Balko","doi":"10.1638/2025-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the frequency of invertebrates in research, zoological, and personal collections, sedation and anesthesia in these species remains poorly studied. This study assessed anesthetic techniques in paper kite butterflies (<i>Idea leuconoe</i>). Thirty-six recently emerged butterflies were individually placed in 1.9 L air-tight containers and randomly exposed to one of six treatments (n = 6/group): 5% isoflurane via vaporizer (2 L min-<sup>1</sup>, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) 1.0); (V), 0.5 mL (CB0.5) or 3.0 mL (CB3) liquid isoflurane on a cotton ball (FiO<sub>2</sub> 0.21); 100% carbon dioxide via flowmeter (2 L min-<sup>1</sup>) (CO<sub>2</sub>); cooling at 2.78°C, or no treatment (control) (CT). Three min (V, CB0.5, CB3, CO<sub>2</sub>) or 10 min (°C) following recumbency, butterflies were removed from exposure, manually manipulated, and monitored for return to upright posture. Times to recumbency, return to upright, and response to manipulation were recorded. Collected data were compared between groups (significance <i>P</i> < 0.05). Except in CT, all butterflies achieved recumbency. Median (range) time to recumbency was 1.3 (0.5-3.6), 2.8 (1.6-4.6), 1.7 (0.9-2.9), 1.2 (0.8-2.2), and 1.4 (1.0-3.5) min in V, CB0.5, CB3, CO<sub>2</sub>, and °C, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.106). Median (range) time to upright was 9.3 (0.7-15.2), 13.8 (6.0-24.0), 14.9 (8.2-26.6), 1.3 (0.9-9.0), and 9.6 (3.6-30.0) min in V, CB0.5, CB3, CO<sub>2</sub>, and °C, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.019). All butterflies recovered uneventfully. This is the first peer-reviewed evaluation of anesthetic techniques in butterflies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17667,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","volume":"57 2","pages":"289-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INVESTIGATION OF ANESTHESIA TECHNIQUES IN PAPER KITE BUTTERFLIES (<i>IDEA LEUCONOE</i>).\",\"authors\":\"Samuel M Tucker, Gregory A Lewbart, Yang Qu, Ulrich Hartmond, Julie A Balko\",\"doi\":\"10.1638/2025-0082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the frequency of invertebrates in research, zoological, and personal collections, sedation and anesthesia in these species remains poorly studied. This study assessed anesthetic techniques in paper kite butterflies (<i>Idea leuconoe</i>). Thirty-six recently emerged butterflies were individually placed in 1.9 L air-tight containers and randomly exposed to one of six treatments (n = 6/group): 5% isoflurane via vaporizer (2 L min-<sup>1</sup>, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) 1.0); (V), 0.5 mL (CB0.5) or 3.0 mL (CB3) liquid isoflurane on a cotton ball (FiO<sub>2</sub> 0.21); 100% carbon dioxide via flowmeter (2 L min-<sup>1</sup>) (CO<sub>2</sub>); cooling at 2.78°C, or no treatment (control) (CT). Three min (V, CB0.5, CB3, CO<sub>2</sub>) or 10 min (°C) following recumbency, butterflies were removed from exposure, manually manipulated, and monitored for return to upright posture. Times to recumbency, return to upright, and response to manipulation were recorded. Collected data were compared between groups (significance <i>P</i> < 0.05). Except in CT, all butterflies achieved recumbency. Median (range) time to recumbency was 1.3 (0.5-3.6), 2.8 (1.6-4.6), 1.7 (0.9-2.9), 1.2 (0.8-2.2), and 1.4 (1.0-3.5) min in V, CB0.5, CB3, CO<sub>2</sub>, and °C, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.106). Median (range) time to upright was 9.3 (0.7-15.2), 13.8 (6.0-24.0), 14.9 (8.2-26.6), 1.3 (0.9-9.0), and 9.6 (3.6-30.0) min in V, CB0.5, CB3, CO<sub>2</sub>, and °C, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.019). All butterflies recovered uneventfully. This is the first peer-reviewed evaluation of anesthetic techniques in butterflies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine\",\"volume\":\"57 2\",\"pages\":\"289-296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1638/2025-0082\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1638/2025-0082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
INVESTIGATION OF ANESTHESIA TECHNIQUES IN PAPER KITE BUTTERFLIES (IDEA LEUCONOE).
Despite the frequency of invertebrates in research, zoological, and personal collections, sedation and anesthesia in these species remains poorly studied. This study assessed anesthetic techniques in paper kite butterflies (Idea leuconoe). Thirty-six recently emerged butterflies were individually placed in 1.9 L air-tight containers and randomly exposed to one of six treatments (n = 6/group): 5% isoflurane via vaporizer (2 L min-1, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) 1.0); (V), 0.5 mL (CB0.5) or 3.0 mL (CB3) liquid isoflurane on a cotton ball (FiO2 0.21); 100% carbon dioxide via flowmeter (2 L min-1) (CO2); cooling at 2.78°C, or no treatment (control) (CT). Three min (V, CB0.5, CB3, CO2) or 10 min (°C) following recumbency, butterflies were removed from exposure, manually manipulated, and monitored for return to upright posture. Times to recumbency, return to upright, and response to manipulation were recorded. Collected data were compared between groups (significance P < 0.05). Except in CT, all butterflies achieved recumbency. Median (range) time to recumbency was 1.3 (0.5-3.6), 2.8 (1.6-4.6), 1.7 (0.9-2.9), 1.2 (0.8-2.2), and 1.4 (1.0-3.5) min in V, CB0.5, CB3, CO2, and °C, respectively (P = 0.106). Median (range) time to upright was 9.3 (0.7-15.2), 13.8 (6.0-24.0), 14.9 (8.2-26.6), 1.3 (0.9-9.0), and 9.6 (3.6-30.0) min in V, CB0.5, CB3, CO2, and °C, respectively (P = 0.019). All butterflies recovered uneventfully. This is the first peer-reviewed evaluation of anesthetic techniques in butterflies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine (JZWM) is considered one of the major sources of information on the biology and veterinary aspects in the field. It stems from the founding premise of AAZV to share zoo animal medicine experiences. The Journal evolved from the long history of members producing case reports and the increased publication of free-ranging wildlife papers.
The Journal accepts manuscripts of original research findings, case reports in the field of veterinary medicine dealing with captive and free-ranging wild animals, brief communications regarding clinical or research observations that may warrant publication. It also publishes and encourages submission of relevant editorials, reviews, special reports, clinical challenges, abstracts of selected articles and book reviews. The Journal is published quarterly, is peer reviewed, is indexed by the major abstracting services, and is international in scope and distribution.
Areas of interest include clinical medicine, surgery, anatomy, radiology, physiology, reproduction, nutrition, parasitology, microbiology, immunology, pathology (including infectious diseases and clinical pathology), toxicology, pharmacology, and epidemiology.