Evan S. Forsythe, Blaine S. Pappa, Darren A. Clavette, Devin Y. Mendoza
{"title":"在四分类单元基因组数据集中检测隐鬼谱系渗入","authors":"Evan S. Forsythe, Blaine S. Pappa, Darren A. Clavette, Devin Y. Mendoza","doi":"10.1002/aps3.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>Hybridization and introgression are pervasive evolutionary forces that have played fundamental roles in shaping the diversity of wild and domesticated plants. Four-taxon tests for introgression provide a reliable framework for detecting signatures of ancient introgression from genomic data, which have played an important role in revealing the reticulate nature of plant evolution; however, there is emerging evidence that a cryptic process known as ghost lineage introgression has the potential to dramatically skew interpretations of four-taxon introgression statistics, particularly our ability to determine the lineages involved in introgression. This ambiguity limits our ability to resolve the mechanisms and functional implications of introgression because it means we can determine neither the donor nor the recipient of introgressed alleles with confidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Here, we develop ghostbuster, a statistical test designed to detect ghost lineage introgression in genomic data based on patterns of sequence divergence. We employ coalescent simulations to test our method and ascertain the conditions under which it accurately identifies ingroup versus ghost lineage introgression. Finally, to demonstrate the utility of ghostbuster, we apply it to a previously identified introgression event in the plant family Brassicaceae.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our simulations reveal that ghostbuster accurately distinguishes ghost lineage introgression from ingroup introgression across a range of introgression scenarios, with errors arising only when divergence events are closely spaced or when ancestral population sizes are unbalanced. Our analysis of empirical plant data reveals that the previously identified introgression likely constitutes ghost lineage introgression and, thus, was previously misinterpreted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Our analyses of simulated and empirical data demonstrate that ghostbuster will be a helpful tool in resolving reticulate evolution in plants and other taxa. We demonstrate the biological insights that ghostbuster provides by presenting an updated model of ghost lineage introgression in Brassicaceae, impacting our understanding of the molecular evolution of crop and model species in this important plant lineage. Ghostbuster code is freely available at: https://github.com/EvanForsythe/Ghost_introgression.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8022,"journal":{"name":"Applications in Plant Sciences","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aps3.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting cryptic ghost lineage introgression in four-taxon genomic datasets\",\"authors\":\"Evan S. Forsythe, Blaine S. Pappa, Darren A. Clavette, Devin Y. Mendoza\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aps3.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Premise</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hybridization and introgression are pervasive evolutionary forces that have played fundamental roles in shaping the diversity of wild and domesticated plants. Four-taxon tests for introgression provide a reliable framework for detecting signatures of ancient introgression from genomic data, which have played an important role in revealing the reticulate nature of plant evolution; however, there is emerging evidence that a cryptic process known as ghost lineage introgression has the potential to dramatically skew interpretations of four-taxon introgression statistics, particularly our ability to determine the lineages involved in introgression. This ambiguity limits our ability to resolve the mechanisms and functional implications of introgression because it means we can determine neither the donor nor the recipient of introgressed alleles with confidence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Here, we develop ghostbuster, a statistical test designed to detect ghost lineage introgression in genomic data based on patterns of sequence divergence. We employ coalescent simulations to test our method and ascertain the conditions under which it accurately identifies ingroup versus ghost lineage introgression. Finally, to demonstrate the utility of ghostbuster, we apply it to a previously identified introgression event in the plant family Brassicaceae.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our simulations reveal that ghostbuster accurately distinguishes ghost lineage introgression from ingroup introgression across a range of introgression scenarios, with errors arising only when divergence events are closely spaced or when ancestral population sizes are unbalanced. Our analysis of empirical plant data reveals that the previously identified introgression likely constitutes ghost lineage introgression and, thus, was previously misinterpreted.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our analyses of simulated and empirical data demonstrate that ghostbuster will be a helpful tool in resolving reticulate evolution in plants and other taxa. We demonstrate the biological insights that ghostbuster provides by presenting an updated model of ghost lineage introgression in Brassicaceae, impacting our understanding of the molecular evolution of crop and model species in this important plant lineage. Ghostbuster code is freely available at: https://github.com/EvanForsythe/Ghost_introgression.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applications in Plant Sciences\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aps3.70045\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applications in Plant Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.70045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications in Plant Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Detecting cryptic ghost lineage introgression in four-taxon genomic datasets
Premise
Hybridization and introgression are pervasive evolutionary forces that have played fundamental roles in shaping the diversity of wild and domesticated plants. Four-taxon tests for introgression provide a reliable framework for detecting signatures of ancient introgression from genomic data, which have played an important role in revealing the reticulate nature of plant evolution; however, there is emerging evidence that a cryptic process known as ghost lineage introgression has the potential to dramatically skew interpretations of four-taxon introgression statistics, particularly our ability to determine the lineages involved in introgression. This ambiguity limits our ability to resolve the mechanisms and functional implications of introgression because it means we can determine neither the donor nor the recipient of introgressed alleles with confidence.
Methods
Here, we develop ghostbuster, a statistical test designed to detect ghost lineage introgression in genomic data based on patterns of sequence divergence. We employ coalescent simulations to test our method and ascertain the conditions under which it accurately identifies ingroup versus ghost lineage introgression. Finally, to demonstrate the utility of ghostbuster, we apply it to a previously identified introgression event in the plant family Brassicaceae.
Results
Our simulations reveal that ghostbuster accurately distinguishes ghost lineage introgression from ingroup introgression across a range of introgression scenarios, with errors arising only when divergence events are closely spaced or when ancestral population sizes are unbalanced. Our analysis of empirical plant data reveals that the previously identified introgression likely constitutes ghost lineage introgression and, thus, was previously misinterpreted.
Discussion
Our analyses of simulated and empirical data demonstrate that ghostbuster will be a helpful tool in resolving reticulate evolution in plants and other taxa. We demonstrate the biological insights that ghostbuster provides by presenting an updated model of ghost lineage introgression in Brassicaceae, impacting our understanding of the molecular evolution of crop and model species in this important plant lineage. Ghostbuster code is freely available at: https://github.com/EvanForsythe/Ghost_introgression.
期刊介绍:
Applications in Plant Sciences (APPS) is a monthly, peer-reviewed, open access journal promoting the rapid dissemination of newly developed, innovative tools and protocols in all areas of the plant sciences, including genetics, structure, function, development, evolution, systematics, and ecology. Given the rapid progress today in technology and its application in the plant sciences, the goal of APPS is to foster communication within the plant science community to advance scientific research. APPS is a publication of the Botanical Society of America, originating in 2009 as the American Journal of Botany''s online-only section, AJB Primer Notes & Protocols in the Plant Sciences.
APPS publishes the following types of articles: (1) Protocol Notes describe new methods and technological advancements; (2) Genomic Resources Articles characterize the development and demonstrate the usefulness of newly developed genomic resources, including transcriptomes; (3) Software Notes detail new software applications; (4) Application Articles illustrate the application of a new protocol, method, or software application within the context of a larger study; (5) Review Articles evaluate available techniques, methods, or protocols; (6) Primer Notes report novel genetic markers with evidence of wide applicability.