超越ICHD-3标准:儿科头痛的诊断挑战。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-16 DOI:10.1177/03331024261447378
Laura Papetti, Alessandro Borrelli, Carmen Granata, Gabriele Monte, Fabiana Ursitti, Giorgia Sforza, Massimiliano Valeriani
{"title":"超越ICHD-3标准:儿科头痛的诊断挑战。","authors":"Laura Papetti, Alessandro Borrelli, Carmen Granata, Gabriele Monte, Fabiana Ursitti, Giorgia Sforza, Massimiliano Valeriani","doi":"10.1177/03331024261447378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDiagnosing headache in children and adolescents is challenging because clinical features vary with age, primary and secondary forms may overlap and the use of investigations is often inconsistent.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on headache diagnosis in individuals aged 1-18 years (2018-2025). Of 126 records identified, 36 met eligibility criteria and were included.ResultsSeveral studies indicate that ICHD-3 criteria, developed mainly in adults, may not fully reflect paediatric presentations, contributing to diagnostic uncertainty. Evidence clarifies the value of some red flags while challenging others. Neuroimaging demonstrates low diagnostic yield except in selected cases. Common pitfalls include overdiagnosis of sinusitis, inappropriate EEG use and unnecessary ophthalmologic or allergologic testing.ConclusionsAccurate diagnosis relies on careful history taking, recognition of age-specific patterns and judicious use of investigations. Paediatric-focused diagnostic pathways are needed. Emerging digital tools and biomarkers may support earlier and more precise diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"46 6","pages":"3331024261447378"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond ICHD-3 criteria: Diagnostic challenges in headache in pediatric age.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Papetti, Alessandro Borrelli, Carmen Granata, Gabriele Monte, Fabiana Ursitti, Giorgia Sforza, Massimiliano Valeriani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03331024261447378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundDiagnosing headache in children and adolescents is challenging because clinical features vary with age, primary and secondary forms may overlap and the use of investigations is often inconsistent.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on headache diagnosis in individuals aged 1-18 years (2018-2025). Of 126 records identified, 36 met eligibility criteria and were included.ResultsSeveral studies indicate that ICHD-3 criteria, developed mainly in adults, may not fully reflect paediatric presentations, contributing to diagnostic uncertainty. Evidence clarifies the value of some red flags while challenging others. Neuroimaging demonstrates low diagnostic yield except in selected cases. Common pitfalls include overdiagnosis of sinusitis, inappropriate EEG use and unnecessary ophthalmologic or allergologic testing.ConclusionsAccurate diagnosis relies on careful history taking, recognition of age-specific patterns and judicious use of investigations. Paediatric-focused diagnostic pathways are needed. Emerging digital tools and biomarkers may support earlier and more precise diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"volume\":\"46 6\",\"pages\":\"3331024261447378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024261447378\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024261447378","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿童和青少年头痛的诊断具有挑战性,因为临床特征随年龄的变化而变化,原发性和继发性形式可能重叠,并且调查的使用往往不一致。方法我们按照PRISMA指南进行了范围审查。检索PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆,检索1-18岁人群(2018-2025)头痛诊断的研究。在确定的126个记录中,有36个符合资格标准并被纳入。结果几项研究表明,主要针对成人制定的ICHD-3标准可能不能完全反映儿科症状,导致诊断不确定性。证据阐明了一些危险信号的价值,同时对其他危险信号提出了质疑。除个别病例外,神经影像学显示低诊断率。常见的缺陷包括鼻窦炎的过度诊断,不适当的脑电图使用和不必要的眼科或过敏症检查。结论:准确的诊断依赖于仔细的病史记录,对年龄特异性模式的认识和明智地使用调查。需要以儿科为重点的诊断途径。新兴的数字工具和生物标记物可能支持更早、更精确的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond ICHD-3 criteria: Diagnostic challenges in headache in pediatric age.

BackgroundDiagnosing headache in children and adolescents is challenging because clinical features vary with age, primary and secondary forms may overlap and the use of investigations is often inconsistent.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on headache diagnosis in individuals aged 1-18 years (2018-2025). Of 126 records identified, 36 met eligibility criteria and were included.ResultsSeveral studies indicate that ICHD-3 criteria, developed mainly in adults, may not fully reflect paediatric presentations, contributing to diagnostic uncertainty. Evidence clarifies the value of some red flags while challenging others. Neuroimaging demonstrates low diagnostic yield except in selected cases. Common pitfalls include overdiagnosis of sinusitis, inappropriate EEG use and unnecessary ophthalmologic or allergologic testing.ConclusionsAccurate diagnosis relies on careful history taking, recognition of age-specific patterns and judicious use of investigations. Paediatric-focused diagnostic pathways are needed. Emerging digital tools and biomarkers may support earlier and more precise diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书