教师如何在教学中采用循证策略?中国小学教师培训项目的过程评价

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Wenqing Chen, Stephen Gorard
{"title":"教师如何在教学中采用循证策略?中国小学教师培训项目的过程评价","authors":"Wenqing Chen,&nbsp;Stephen Gorard","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2026.103043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Feasibility of effectively incorporating research evidence into teaching remains poorly understood. This study presents process evaluation results for a large-scale randomised controlled trial in China which estimated the impact of a teacher training programme to help adapt research evidence into practice, involving 154 teachers and 6904 students. Teachers’ adherence to the intervention emerged as a likely critical determinant of the intervention’s effectiveness, evidenced by a Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE) of +0.22 on students’ Chinese test scores. Teachers’ adherence relates to school-level monitoring, teachers’ skills, and peer collaboration. Drawing on 44 classroom observations, adapting research evidence evolved iteratively, with ongoing adjustment and reflection. This study proposes a multi-level \"Implementation Cycle\" derived from the Chinese primary education context, illustrating how evidence-informed strategies evolve in practice. The cycle highlights that interactions between teachers help identify and correct mis-adaptations, a process often missing in existing implementation frameworks. It links school leadership, peer support, and teacher skills to help tailor evidence-informed strategies to specific classroom contexts. The framework serves as a template for school-based evidence-use initiatives, offering practical guidance for the effective use of research evidence in practice and a basis for future validation across diverse educational systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Research","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 103043"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do teachers adapt evidence-informed strategies for teaching? A process evaluation of a teacher training programme in Chinese primary schools\",\"authors\":\"Wenqing Chen,&nbsp;Stephen Gorard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijer.2026.103043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Feasibility of effectively incorporating research evidence into teaching remains poorly understood. This study presents process evaluation results for a large-scale randomised controlled trial in China which estimated the impact of a teacher training programme to help adapt research evidence into practice, involving 154 teachers and 6904 students. Teachers’ adherence to the intervention emerged as a likely critical determinant of the intervention’s effectiveness, evidenced by a Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE) of +0.22 on students’ Chinese test scores. Teachers’ adherence relates to school-level monitoring, teachers’ skills, and peer collaboration. Drawing on 44 classroom observations, adapting research evidence evolved iteratively, with ongoing adjustment and reflection. This study proposes a multi-level \\\"Implementation Cycle\\\" derived from the Chinese primary education context, illustrating how evidence-informed strategies evolve in practice. The cycle highlights that interactions between teachers help identify and correct mis-adaptations, a process often missing in existing implementation frameworks. It links school leadership, peer support, and teacher skills to help tailor evidence-informed strategies to specific classroom contexts. The framework serves as a template for school-based evidence-use initiatives, offering practical guidance for the effective use of research evidence in practice and a basis for future validation across diverse educational systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088303552600114X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088303552600114X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效地将研究证据纳入教学的可行性仍然知之甚少。本研究介绍了中国一项大规模随机对照试验的过程评估结果,该试验评估了教师培训计划的影响,以帮助将研究证据应用于实践,涉及154名教师和6904名学生。教师对干预的依从性可能是干预有效性的关键决定因素,对学生中文考试成绩的平均因果效应(CACE)为+0.22。教师的依从性与学校层面的监督、教师技能和同伴合作有关。借鉴44个课堂观察,适应研究证据迭代发展,不断调整和反思。本研究从中国小学教育背景出发,提出了一个多层次的“实施周期”,说明循证策略在实践中的演变。这一循环强调,教师之间的互动有助于识别和纠正错误适应,而这一过程在现有的实施框架中往往缺失。它将学校领导、同伴支持和教师技能联系起来,帮助为特定的课堂环境量身定制循证策略。该框架可作为基于学校的证据使用倡议的模板,为在实践中有效使用研究证据提供实用指导,并为未来在不同教育系统中进行验证提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do teachers adapt evidence-informed strategies for teaching? A process evaluation of a teacher training programme in Chinese primary schools
Feasibility of effectively incorporating research evidence into teaching remains poorly understood. This study presents process evaluation results for a large-scale randomised controlled trial in China which estimated the impact of a teacher training programme to help adapt research evidence into practice, involving 154 teachers and 6904 students. Teachers’ adherence to the intervention emerged as a likely critical determinant of the intervention’s effectiveness, evidenced by a Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE) of +0.22 on students’ Chinese test scores. Teachers’ adherence relates to school-level monitoring, teachers’ skills, and peer collaboration. Drawing on 44 classroom observations, adapting research evidence evolved iteratively, with ongoing adjustment and reflection. This study proposes a multi-level "Implementation Cycle" derived from the Chinese primary education context, illustrating how evidence-informed strategies evolve in practice. The cycle highlights that interactions between teachers help identify and correct mis-adaptations, a process often missing in existing implementation frameworks. It links school leadership, peer support, and teacher skills to help tailor evidence-informed strategies to specific classroom contexts. The framework serves as a template for school-based evidence-use initiatives, offering practical guidance for the effective use of research evidence in practice and a basis for future validation across diverse educational systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Research
International Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Research publishes regular papers and special issues on specific topics of interest to international audiences of educational researchers. Examples of recent Special Issues published in the journal illustrate the breadth of topics that have be included in the journal: Students Perspectives on Learning Environments, Social, Motivational and Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Epistemological Beliefs and Domain, Analyzing Mathematics Classroom Cultures and Practices, and Music Education: A site for collaborative creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书