基于libs的岩石分类中一维和二维光谱表示的比较分析

IF 3.3 2区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Tengfeng Ni, Yun Tang, Zeen Yang, Xiang Zhang, Zhanke Peng, Wenlong Xie, Bingjie Xu and Wanjin Yuan
{"title":"基于libs的岩石分类中一维和二维光谱表示的比较分析","authors":"Tengfeng Ni, Yun Tang, Zeen Yang, Xiang Zhang, Zhanke Peng, Wenlong Xie, Bingjie Xu and Wanjin Yuan","doi":"10.1039/D6JA00142D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) demonstrates substantial potential for rapid rock identification. However, its classification performance is limited when distinguishing rocks with highly similar elemental compositions due to the high dimensionality of spectral data and complex spectral feature relationships. This study employed seven diorite-related rock samples to systematically evaluate the effects of one-dimensional spectral representation and two-dimensional spectral transformation on classification performance. First, the original spectra were resampled from 16 376 to 1024 wavelength points using the piecewise cubic Hermite interpolation polynomial (PCHIP). Support vector machine (SVM) and one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) served as baseline models for one-dimensional classification. Subsequently, the one-dimensional spectra were converted into two-dimensional spectral images using Gramian Angular Summation Field (GASF) and continuous wavelet transform (CWT). Four two-dimensional models—2D-CNN, DenseNet121, GoogLeNet, and MSCNN—were then applied for classification. The results demonstrated that two-dimensional spectral representation significantly improved classification performance compared with direct one-dimensional spectral classification. The classification accuracies of SVM and 1D-CNN were 74.76% and 82.86%, respectively, whereas the accuracy, precision, and recall values of all two-dimensional models under both transformation methods exceeded 85%. Furthermore, the results indicated that the compatibility between model architecture and spectral transformation method further influenced the final classification performance. DenseNet121 achieved the highest accuracy of 97.62% under the GASF representation. In contrast, GoogLeNet and MSCNN performed better under the CWT representation, attaining accuracies of 95.71% and 96.67%, respectively. These findings suggest that two-dimensional spectral representation enhances the capability of LIBS to discriminate between similar rock samples. Furthermore, the final classification performance depends not only on the transformation method but also on its compatibility with the model architecture. This study provides a reference for optimizing spectral representation strategies in LIBS-based rock classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":81,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","volume":" 6","pages":" 2202-2210"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of one- and two-dimensional spectral representations for LIBS-based classification of rocks\",\"authors\":\"Tengfeng Ni, Yun Tang, Zeen Yang, Xiang Zhang, Zhanke Peng, Wenlong Xie, Bingjie Xu and Wanjin Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D6JA00142D\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) demonstrates substantial potential for rapid rock identification. However, its classification performance is limited when distinguishing rocks with highly similar elemental compositions due to the high dimensionality of spectral data and complex spectral feature relationships. This study employed seven diorite-related rock samples to systematically evaluate the effects of one-dimensional spectral representation and two-dimensional spectral transformation on classification performance. First, the original spectra were resampled from 16 376 to 1024 wavelength points using the piecewise cubic Hermite interpolation polynomial (PCHIP). Support vector machine (SVM) and one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) served as baseline models for one-dimensional classification. Subsequently, the one-dimensional spectra were converted into two-dimensional spectral images using Gramian Angular Summation Field (GASF) and continuous wavelet transform (CWT). Four two-dimensional models—2D-CNN, DenseNet121, GoogLeNet, and MSCNN—were then applied for classification. The results demonstrated that two-dimensional spectral representation significantly improved classification performance compared with direct one-dimensional spectral classification. The classification accuracies of SVM and 1D-CNN were 74.76% and 82.86%, respectively, whereas the accuracy, precision, and recall values of all two-dimensional models under both transformation methods exceeded 85%. Furthermore, the results indicated that the compatibility between model architecture and spectral transformation method further influenced the final classification performance. DenseNet121 achieved the highest accuracy of 97.62% under the GASF representation. In contrast, GoogLeNet and MSCNN performed better under the CWT representation, attaining accuracies of 95.71% and 96.67%, respectively. These findings suggest that two-dimensional spectral representation enhances the capability of LIBS to discriminate between similar rock samples. Furthermore, the final classification performance depends not only on the transformation method but also on its compatibility with the model architecture. This study provides a reference for optimizing spectral representation strategies in LIBS-based rock classification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry\",\"volume\":\" 6\",\"pages\":\" 2202-2210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/ja/d6ja00142d\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/ja/d6ja00142d","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)显示出快速岩石识别的巨大潜力。然而,由于光谱数据的高维数和复杂的光谱特征关系,该方法在识别元素组成高度相似的岩石时,其分类性能受到限制。本研究采用7个闪长岩相关岩石样品,系统评价了一维光谱表示和二维光谱变换对分类性能的影响。首先,利用分段三次Hermite插值多项式(PCHIP)对16376 ~ 1024个波长点的原始光谱进行重采样;支持向量机(SVM)和一维卷积神经网络(1D-CNN)作为一维分类的基线模型。随后,利用Gramian角和场(GASF)和连续小波变换(CWT)将一维光谱转换为二维光谱图像。然后应用2d - cnn、DenseNet121、GoogLeNet和mscnn四个二维模型进行分类。结果表明,与直接的一维光谱分类相比,二维光谱表示显著提高了分类性能。SVM和1D-CNN的分类准确率分别为74.76%和82.86%,两种转换方法下二维模型的准确率、精密度和召回率均超过85%。此外,模型架构与光谱变换方法的兼容性进一步影响了最终的分类性能。DenseNet121在GASF表示下达到了97.62%的最高准确率。相比之下,GoogLeNet和MSCNN在CWT表示下表现更好,准确率分别达到95.71%和96.67%。这些发现表明,二维光谱表示增强了LIBS区分相似岩石样品的能力。此外,最终的分类性能不仅取决于转换方法,还取决于其与模型体系结构的兼容性。该研究为基于lbs的岩石分类中谱表示策略的优化提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative analysis of one- and two-dimensional spectral representations for LIBS-based classification of rocks

Comparative analysis of one- and two-dimensional spectral representations for LIBS-based classification of rocks

Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) demonstrates substantial potential for rapid rock identification. However, its classification performance is limited when distinguishing rocks with highly similar elemental compositions due to the high dimensionality of spectral data and complex spectral feature relationships. This study employed seven diorite-related rock samples to systematically evaluate the effects of one-dimensional spectral representation and two-dimensional spectral transformation on classification performance. First, the original spectra were resampled from 16 376 to 1024 wavelength points using the piecewise cubic Hermite interpolation polynomial (PCHIP). Support vector machine (SVM) and one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) served as baseline models for one-dimensional classification. Subsequently, the one-dimensional spectra were converted into two-dimensional spectral images using Gramian Angular Summation Field (GASF) and continuous wavelet transform (CWT). Four two-dimensional models—2D-CNN, DenseNet121, GoogLeNet, and MSCNN—were then applied for classification. The results demonstrated that two-dimensional spectral representation significantly improved classification performance compared with direct one-dimensional spectral classification. The classification accuracies of SVM and 1D-CNN were 74.76% and 82.86%, respectively, whereas the accuracy, precision, and recall values of all two-dimensional models under both transformation methods exceeded 85%. Furthermore, the results indicated that the compatibility between model architecture and spectral transformation method further influenced the final classification performance. DenseNet121 achieved the highest accuracy of 97.62% under the GASF representation. In contrast, GoogLeNet and MSCNN performed better under the CWT representation, attaining accuracies of 95.71% and 96.67%, respectively. These findings suggest that two-dimensional spectral representation enhances the capability of LIBS to discriminate between similar rock samples. Furthermore, the final classification performance depends not only on the transformation method but also on its compatibility with the model architecture. This study provides a reference for optimizing spectral representation strategies in LIBS-based rock classification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
26.50%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Innovative research on the fundamental theory and application of spectrometric techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书