四种遗传性脑电图变异携带者的视觉和听觉诱发脑电图电位。

Human neurobiology Pub Date : 1986-01-01
F Vogel, J Krüger, H P Höpp, E Schalt, R Schnobel
{"title":"四种遗传性脑电图变异携带者的视觉和听觉诱发脑电图电位。","authors":"F Vogel,&nbsp;J Krüger,&nbsp;H P Höpp,&nbsp;E Schalt,&nbsp;R Schnobel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visually and auditory evoked EEG potentials were studied in 248 healthy university students, who were carriers of one of the following hereditary EEG variants: Monomorphic alpha-waves; low-voltage-EEG; EEG in which the alpha-rhythm was mixed diffusely with beta-waves; and EEG with fronto-precentral beta-groups. The study uncovered consistent and statistically significant group differences between the EEG-countertypes, monomorphic alpha-waves and the low-voltage EEG: subjects with monomorphic alpha-waves showed higher amplitudes and longer latencies of most peaks of the visually evoked potential (VEP), and higher amplitudes for most peaks of the auditory evoked potentials (AEP). Similar differences between EEG types were shown for two measures--overall amplitude (oscillation) and average latency--of all peaks for VEPs and AEPs. The results are consistent with a hypothesis discussed in an earlier paper in which differences between these two EEG types in processing of information in the CNS were assumed on the basis of psychological test results and neurophysiological theory. The two EEG types with beta-waves in addition to alpha-waves showed latencies of evoked potentials in-between those found in the EEG types with monomorphic alpha-waves, on the one hand, and the low-voltage EEG on the other. There was no significant difference in the frequency of VEP augmenters and reducers between EEG types.</p>","PeriodicalId":77724,"journal":{"name":"Human neurobiology","volume":"5 1","pages":"49-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visually and auditory evoked EEG potentials in carriers of four hereditary EEG variants.\",\"authors\":\"F Vogel,&nbsp;J Krüger,&nbsp;H P Höpp,&nbsp;E Schalt,&nbsp;R Schnobel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Visually and auditory evoked EEG potentials were studied in 248 healthy university students, who were carriers of one of the following hereditary EEG variants: Monomorphic alpha-waves; low-voltage-EEG; EEG in which the alpha-rhythm was mixed diffusely with beta-waves; and EEG with fronto-precentral beta-groups. The study uncovered consistent and statistically significant group differences between the EEG-countertypes, monomorphic alpha-waves and the low-voltage EEG: subjects with monomorphic alpha-waves showed higher amplitudes and longer latencies of most peaks of the visually evoked potential (VEP), and higher amplitudes for most peaks of the auditory evoked potentials (AEP). Similar differences between EEG types were shown for two measures--overall amplitude (oscillation) and average latency--of all peaks for VEPs and AEPs. The results are consistent with a hypothesis discussed in an earlier paper in which differences between these two EEG types in processing of information in the CNS were assumed on the basis of psychological test results and neurophysiological theory. The two EEG types with beta-waves in addition to alpha-waves showed latencies of evoked potentials in-between those found in the EEG types with monomorphic alpha-waves, on the one hand, and the low-voltage EEG on the other. There was no significant difference in the frequency of VEP augmenters and reducers between EEG types.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"49-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对248名携带单态α波的健康大学生进行了脑电视觉和听觉诱发电位的研究。low-voltage-EEG;α节律与β波弥漫性混合的脑电图;前额-中央前β群的脑电图。研究发现,脑电对应型、单态α波和低压脑电图组间存在一致且具有统计学意义的组间差异:单态α波组被试的视觉诱发电位(VEP)大部分峰幅较高,潜伏期较长,听觉诱发电位(AEP)大部分峰幅较高。在vep和aep的所有峰值的两种测量方法——总振幅(振荡)和平均潜伏期——中,显示了EEG类型之间的类似差异。该结果与之前的一篇论文中讨论的假设一致,该假设是根据心理测试结果和神经生理学理论假设这两种脑电图类型在中枢神经系统中处理信息的差异。同时存在α波和β波的两种脑电图类型的诱发电位潜伏期介于α波单态脑电图类型和低压脑电图类型之间。不同脑电图类型间VEP增强和减弱频率无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visually and auditory evoked EEG potentials in carriers of four hereditary EEG variants.

Visually and auditory evoked EEG potentials were studied in 248 healthy university students, who were carriers of one of the following hereditary EEG variants: Monomorphic alpha-waves; low-voltage-EEG; EEG in which the alpha-rhythm was mixed diffusely with beta-waves; and EEG with fronto-precentral beta-groups. The study uncovered consistent and statistically significant group differences between the EEG-countertypes, monomorphic alpha-waves and the low-voltage EEG: subjects with monomorphic alpha-waves showed higher amplitudes and longer latencies of most peaks of the visually evoked potential (VEP), and higher amplitudes for most peaks of the auditory evoked potentials (AEP). Similar differences between EEG types were shown for two measures--overall amplitude (oscillation) and average latency--of all peaks for VEPs and AEPs. The results are consistent with a hypothesis discussed in an earlier paper in which differences between these two EEG types in processing of information in the CNS were assumed on the basis of psychological test results and neurophysiological theory. The two EEG types with beta-waves in addition to alpha-waves showed latencies of evoked potentials in-between those found in the EEG types with monomorphic alpha-waves, on the one hand, and the low-voltage EEG on the other. There was no significant difference in the frequency of VEP augmenters and reducers between EEG types.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信