冲突类型对非洲贸易开放影响的分位数回归分析

IF 1.6 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Economics of Transition and Institutional Change Pub Date : 2026-06-03 Epub Date: 2026-01-17 DOI:10.1111/ecot.70026
Gislain Stéphane Gandjon Fankem, Joseph Sylvain Parfait Nyamsi
{"title":"冲突类型对非洲贸易开放影响的分位数回归分析","authors":"Gislain Stéphane Gandjon Fankem,&nbsp;Joseph Sylvain Parfait Nyamsi","doi":"10.1111/ecot.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Previous studies fail to consider the importance of heterogeneity in the relationship between conflict and trade openness. In this paper, we fill this gap by using quantile regression to analyse the impact of conflict types (internal, external and global) on trade openness (de jure and de facto) in African countries over the period 1984–2017. The quantile regression approach thus enables us to identify the different responses of trade openness to conflicts at different levels of the conditional distribution of trade openness. Overall, our results show that conflicts reduce trade openness, and the impact is greater in countries with a low degree of openness. In particular, the effect of conflict types is negative, and its magnitude decreases as the level of de facto trade openness increases. On the other hand, this negative effect remains stable over the entire conditional distribution of de jure trade openness. Our results do not depend on the choice of conflict and trade openness indicators used. They suggest that countries with the lowest levels of openness are the most affected by conflict.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":40265,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","volume":"34 3","pages":"531-548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantile Regression Analysis of the Impact of Conflict Types on Trade Openness in Africa\",\"authors\":\"Gislain Stéphane Gandjon Fankem,&nbsp;Joseph Sylvain Parfait Nyamsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecot.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Previous studies fail to consider the importance of heterogeneity in the relationship between conflict and trade openness. In this paper, we fill this gap by using quantile regression to analyse the impact of conflict types (internal, external and global) on trade openness (de jure and de facto) in African countries over the period 1984–2017. The quantile regression approach thus enables us to identify the different responses of trade openness to conflicts at different levels of the conditional distribution of trade openness. Overall, our results show that conflicts reduce trade openness, and the impact is greater in countries with a low degree of openness. In particular, the effect of conflict types is negative, and its magnitude decreases as the level of de facto trade openness increases. On the other hand, this negative effect remains stable over the entire conditional distribution of de jure trade openness. Our results do not depend on the choice of conflict and trade openness indicators used. They suggest that countries with the lowest levels of openness are the most affected by conflict.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"531-548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecot.70026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecot.70026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究没有考虑异质性在冲突与贸易开放关系中的重要性。在本文中,我们通过使用分位数回归来分析1984-2017年期间非洲国家冲突类型(内部、外部和全球)对贸易开放(法律上和事实上)的影响,填补了这一空白。因此,分位数回归方法使我们能够确定贸易开放对贸易开放条件分布的不同层次上的冲突的不同反应。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,冲突降低了贸易开放程度,而且在开放程度较低的国家,这种影响更大。特别是,冲突类型的影响是负面的,其程度随着实际贸易开放水平的提高而降低。另一方面,这种负面影响在法律贸易开放的整个条件分布中保持稳定。我们的结果不取决于所使用的冲突和贸易开放指标的选择。他们认为,开放程度最低的国家受冲突的影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantile Regression Analysis of the Impact of Conflict Types on Trade Openness in Africa

Previous studies fail to consider the importance of heterogeneity in the relationship between conflict and trade openness. In this paper, we fill this gap by using quantile regression to analyse the impact of conflict types (internal, external and global) on trade openness (de jure and de facto) in African countries over the period 1984–2017. The quantile regression approach thus enables us to identify the different responses of trade openness to conflicts at different levels of the conditional distribution of trade openness. Overall, our results show that conflicts reduce trade openness, and the impact is greater in countries with a low degree of openness. In particular, the effect of conflict types is negative, and its magnitude decreases as the level of de facto trade openness increases. On the other hand, this negative effect remains stable over the entire conditional distribution of de jure trade openness. Our results do not depend on the choice of conflict and trade openness indicators used. They suggest that countries with the lowest levels of openness are the most affected by conflict.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书