{"title":"武装冲突与企业绩效:来自2008年格鲁吉亚-俄罗斯冲突的证据","authors":"Helena Schweiger","doi":"10.1111/ecot.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper examines how a brief armed conflict affects firm performance and survival, using evidence from Georgia following the August 2008 war. Combining firm-level survey data with geolocated information on conflict events, military installations and bank branches, the analysis reveals heterogeneous firm responses. In the short run, firms located near conflict events experienced smaller declines in sales and sales per permanent, full-time employee than nonexposed firms, despite substantial losses among young firms and exporters closest to the bombing. By 2011, surviving exposed firms outperformed nonexposed survivors in sales and labour productivity. At the same time, local armed conflict exposure increased firm exit, particularly among exporters, pointing to selective exit, reduced competition and transport disruptions as mechanisms driving the results.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":40265,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","volume":"34 3","pages":"549-571"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Armed Conflict and Firm Performance: Evidence From the 2008 Georgia-Russia Conflict\",\"authors\":\"Helena Schweiger\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecot.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This paper examines how a brief armed conflict affects firm performance and survival, using evidence from Georgia following the August 2008 war. Combining firm-level survey data with geolocated information on conflict events, military installations and bank branches, the analysis reveals heterogeneous firm responses. In the short run, firms located near conflict events experienced smaller declines in sales and sales per permanent, full-time employee than nonexposed firms, despite substantial losses among young firms and exporters closest to the bombing. By 2011, surviving exposed firms outperformed nonexposed survivors in sales and labour productivity. At the same time, local armed conflict exposure increased firm exit, particularly among exporters, pointing to selective exit, reduced competition and transport disruptions as mechanisms driving the results.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"549-571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecot.70022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecot.70022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Armed Conflict and Firm Performance: Evidence From the 2008 Georgia-Russia Conflict
This paper examines how a brief armed conflict affects firm performance and survival, using evidence from Georgia following the August 2008 war. Combining firm-level survey data with geolocated information on conflict events, military installations and bank branches, the analysis reveals heterogeneous firm responses. In the short run, firms located near conflict events experienced smaller declines in sales and sales per permanent, full-time employee than nonexposed firms, despite substantial losses among young firms and exporters closest to the bombing. By 2011, surviving exposed firms outperformed nonexposed survivors in sales and labour productivity. At the same time, local armed conflict exposure increased firm exit, particularly among exporters, pointing to selective exit, reduced competition and transport disruptions as mechanisms driving the results.