George H Crossley, Jamie Kowal, Allison Siehr, Thomas R Holmes, Alberto Aimo
{"title":"胸骨后血管外植入式心律转复除颤器:植入式特性、除颤试验和急性安全性的系统综述。","authors":"George H Crossley, Jamie Kowal, Allison Siehr, Thomas R Holmes, Alberto Aimo","doi":"10.1080/14796678.2026.2676272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) terminate potentially deadly ventricular arrhythmias in at-risk patients. Retrosternal extravascular ICDs (EV-ICD) place a lead in the mediastinal space to provide both shock and antitachycardia pacing therapy without the need for venous access. A systematic review was performed to assess acute outcomes in patients implanted with a retrosternal EV-ICD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A query of EMBASE and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify unique retrosternal EV-ICD cohort studies published between JAN-1-2020 and JAN-31-2026. Two known retrosternal EV-ICDs were included, the market-approved Medtronic substernal EV-ICD system and investigational AtaCor intercostal EV-ICD lead. Procedure and defibrillation testing details and acute safety data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen articles (<i>n</i> = 806 patients) met criteria for inclusion. Lead placement success was 99.6% and 97.3% while defibrillation testing success was 98.5% and 97.2% for the substernal EV-ICD system and intercostal EV-ICD lead, respectively. Periprocedural complications were manageable with a rate of 1.5% (<i>n</i> = 11/731) for the substernal EV-ICD system and 8.2% (<i>n</i> = 6/73) for the intercostal EV-ICD lead.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available evidence suggests that periprocedural outcomes and acute safety of retrosternal EV-ICD systems, particularly the substernal EV-ICD system, is an effective and safe strategy that provide potentially lifesaving therapy while preserving the vasculature.<b>Protocol registration</b>: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD420261328371.</p>","PeriodicalId":12589,"journal":{"name":"Future cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"659-671"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13285608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrosternal extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a systematic review of implant characteristics, defibrillation testing, and acute safety.\",\"authors\":\"George H Crossley, Jamie Kowal, Allison Siehr, Thomas R Holmes, Alberto Aimo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796678.2026.2676272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) terminate potentially deadly ventricular arrhythmias in at-risk patients. Retrosternal extravascular ICDs (EV-ICD) place a lead in the mediastinal space to provide both shock and antitachycardia pacing therapy without the need for venous access. A systematic review was performed to assess acute outcomes in patients implanted with a retrosternal EV-ICD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A query of EMBASE and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify unique retrosternal EV-ICD cohort studies published between JAN-1-2020 and JAN-31-2026. Two known retrosternal EV-ICDs were included, the market-approved Medtronic substernal EV-ICD system and investigational AtaCor intercostal EV-ICD lead. Procedure and defibrillation testing details and acute safety data were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen articles (<i>n</i> = 806 patients) met criteria for inclusion. Lead placement success was 99.6% and 97.3% while defibrillation testing success was 98.5% and 97.2% for the substernal EV-ICD system and intercostal EV-ICD lead, respectively. Periprocedural complications were manageable with a rate of 1.5% (<i>n</i> = 11/731) for the substernal EV-ICD system and 8.2% (<i>n</i> = 6/73) for the intercostal EV-ICD lead.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available evidence suggests that periprocedural outcomes and acute safety of retrosternal EV-ICD systems, particularly the substernal EV-ICD system, is an effective and safe strategy that provide potentially lifesaving therapy while preserving the vasculature.<b>Protocol registration</b>: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD420261328371.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"659-671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13285608/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2026.2676272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/6/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2026.2676272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Retrosternal extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a systematic review of implant characteristics, defibrillation testing, and acute safety.
Introduction: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) terminate potentially deadly ventricular arrhythmias in at-risk patients. Retrosternal extravascular ICDs (EV-ICD) place a lead in the mediastinal space to provide both shock and antitachycardia pacing therapy without the need for venous access. A systematic review was performed to assess acute outcomes in patients implanted with a retrosternal EV-ICD.
Methods: A query of EMBASE and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify unique retrosternal EV-ICD cohort studies published between JAN-1-2020 and JAN-31-2026. Two known retrosternal EV-ICDs were included, the market-approved Medtronic substernal EV-ICD system and investigational AtaCor intercostal EV-ICD lead. Procedure and defibrillation testing details and acute safety data were collected.
Results: Fourteen articles (n = 806 patients) met criteria for inclusion. Lead placement success was 99.6% and 97.3% while defibrillation testing success was 98.5% and 97.2% for the substernal EV-ICD system and intercostal EV-ICD lead, respectively. Periprocedural complications were manageable with a rate of 1.5% (n = 11/731) for the substernal EV-ICD system and 8.2% (n = 6/73) for the intercostal EV-ICD lead.
Conclusions: The available evidence suggests that periprocedural outcomes and acute safety of retrosternal EV-ICD systems, particularly the substernal EV-ICD system, is an effective and safe strategy that provide potentially lifesaving therapy while preserving the vasculature.Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD420261328371.
期刊介绍:
Research advances have contributed to improved outcomes across all specialties, but the rate of advancement in cardiology has been exceptional. Concurrently, the population of patients with cardiac conditions continues to grow and greater public awareness has increased patients" expectations of new drugs and devices. Future Cardiology (ISSN 1479-6678) reflects this new era of cardiology and highlights the new molecular approach to advancing cardiovascular therapy. Coverage will also reflect the major technological advances in bioengineering in cardiology in terms of advanced and robust devices, miniaturization, imaging, system modeling and information management issues.