在视频会议和面对面心理治疗中预测早期情感联系的微过程。

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-14 DOI:10.1037/pst0000623
Diego Fernández-Regueras, Ana Calero-Elvira, M Cristina Guerrero-Escagedo
{"title":"在视频会议和面对面心理治疗中预测早期情感联系的微过程。","authors":"Diego Fernández-Regueras, Ana Calero-Elvira, M Cristina Guerrero-Escagedo","doi":"10.1037/pst0000623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on microprocesses underlying alliance formation remains limited compared to outcome-based studies, particularly in videoconferencing psychotherapy (VCP). This study examined therapist and client interaction patterns predicting early emotional bond in VCP and face-to-face therapy. A total of 56 early therapy sessions from 28 therapist-client dyads were coded with the <i>Therapeutic Relationship Coding System,</i> yielding 35,715 behaviors. Alliance strength was determined through an extreme-groups design based on the Bond subscale of the <i>Working Alliance Inventory-Patient version</i>. Bayesian logistic regression models assessed whether therapist behaviors and therapist-client sequences predicted alliance and their interaction with modality (VCP and face-to-face). Empathy alone predicted weaker bond in VCP, whereas sequences where it was followed by clients' agreement predicted bond more strongly in VCP. Active listening followed by client agreement also predicted stronger bond only in VCP, while both behaviors followed by client disagreement predicted weaker bond across modalities. Joking and accurate recall of prior client information were particularly associated with strong bond in VCP, whereas early therapist disagreement predicted weaker bond across modalities. Findings indicate that precise, accurate, and context-sensitive verbal interactions are especially critical for fostering emotional bond in VCP, where nonverbal cues are limited. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"284-294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microprocesses predicting early emotional bond in videoconferencing and face-to-face psychotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Diego Fernández-Regueras, Ana Calero-Elvira, M Cristina Guerrero-Escagedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pst0000623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research on microprocesses underlying alliance formation remains limited compared to outcome-based studies, particularly in videoconferencing psychotherapy (VCP). This study examined therapist and client interaction patterns predicting early emotional bond in VCP and face-to-face therapy. A total of 56 early therapy sessions from 28 therapist-client dyads were coded with the <i>Therapeutic Relationship Coding System,</i> yielding 35,715 behaviors. Alliance strength was determined through an extreme-groups design based on the Bond subscale of the <i>Working Alliance Inventory-Patient version</i>. Bayesian logistic regression models assessed whether therapist behaviors and therapist-client sequences predicted alliance and their interaction with modality (VCP and face-to-face). Empathy alone predicted weaker bond in VCP, whereas sequences where it was followed by clients' agreement predicted bond more strongly in VCP. Active listening followed by client agreement also predicted stronger bond only in VCP, while both behaviors followed by client disagreement predicted weaker bond across modalities. Joking and accurate recall of prior client information were particularly associated with strong bond in VCP, whereas early therapist disagreement predicted weaker bond across modalities. Findings indicate that precise, accurate, and context-sensitive verbal interactions are especially critical for fostering emotional bond in VCP, where nonverbal cues are limited. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"284-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000623\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与基于结果的研究相比,对联盟形成背后的微过程的研究仍然有限,特别是在视频会议心理治疗(VCP)方面。本研究考察了在VCP和面对面治疗中预测早期情感联系的治疗师和来访者互动模式。用治疗关系编码系统对来自28对治疗师-来访者的56次早期治疗进行编码,产生35,715种行为。联盟强度是通过一个极端群体设计来确定的,该设计基于工作联盟清单-患者版本的Bond子量表。贝叶斯逻辑回归模型评估治疗师行为和治疗师-来访者序列是否预测联盟及其与模式(VCP和面对面)的相互作用。同理心单独预示着VCP中较弱的联系,而同理心后面跟着客户同意的序列则预示着VCP中更强的联系。积极倾听之后的客户同意也预测了仅在VCP中更强的关系,而两种行为之后的客户不同意都预测了跨模式的更弱的关系。开玩笑和对先前客户信息的准确回忆与VCP的强联系特别相关,而早期治疗师的分歧预示着跨模式的弱联系。研究结果表明,在非语言线索有限的VCP中,精确、准确和上下文敏感的语言互动对培养情感纽带尤为重要。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microprocesses predicting early emotional bond in videoconferencing and face-to-face psychotherapy.

Research on microprocesses underlying alliance formation remains limited compared to outcome-based studies, particularly in videoconferencing psychotherapy (VCP). This study examined therapist and client interaction patterns predicting early emotional bond in VCP and face-to-face therapy. A total of 56 early therapy sessions from 28 therapist-client dyads were coded with the Therapeutic Relationship Coding System, yielding 35,715 behaviors. Alliance strength was determined through an extreme-groups design based on the Bond subscale of the Working Alliance Inventory-Patient version. Bayesian logistic regression models assessed whether therapist behaviors and therapist-client sequences predicted alliance and their interaction with modality (VCP and face-to-face). Empathy alone predicted weaker bond in VCP, whereas sequences where it was followed by clients' agreement predicted bond more strongly in VCP. Active listening followed by client agreement also predicted stronger bond only in VCP, while both behaviors followed by client disagreement predicted weaker bond across modalities. Joking and accurate recall of prior client information were particularly associated with strong bond in VCP, whereas early therapist disagreement predicted weaker bond across modalities. Findings indicate that precise, accurate, and context-sensitive verbal interactions are especially critical for fostering emotional bond in VCP, where nonverbal cues are limited. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书