Alessio Signori, Noemi Montobbio, Francesca Bovis, Marta Ponzano, Irene Schiavetti, Alessandra Krenn, Maria Pia Sormani
{"title":"解耦复发减少和残疾进展:来自托勒布替尼研究的证据。","authors":"Alessio Signori, Noemi Montobbio, Francesca Bovis, Marta Ponzano, Irene Schiavetti, Alessandra Krenn, Maria Pia Sormani","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the treatment effects of tolebrutinib on confirmed disability worsening (CDW) diverge from its effects on relapse prevention compared with other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted published effect estimates for annualized relapse rate (ARR) and CDW confirmed at 24 weeks from all phase 3 trials with teriflunomide as the active comparator: ASCLEPIOS (ofatumumab), OPTIMUM (ponesimod), ULTIMATE (ublituximab), EVOLUTION (evobrutinib), and GEMINI (tolebrutinib). When duplicate trials were available, pooled estimates were derived. Log-transformed estimates were used in a weighted linear regression of CDW vs ARR, with bubble size reflecting statistical precision. Tolebrutinib was excluded from the regression fit but displayed for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 4 DMTs other than tolebrutinib, a strong linear association was observed between treatment effects on ARR and CDW (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.997), indicating that disability benefit was generally proportional to relapse reduction. By contrast, tolebrutinib deviated from this relationship, with a hazard ratio for CDW of 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.95) despite a relapse rate ratio of 1.03 (95% CI 0.85-1.25).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Tolebrutinib was the only therapy to show a benefit on CDW without a measurable effect on relapses, highlighting a dissociation between disability worsening and relapse suppression not observed with other DMTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":"16 3","pages":"e200612"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13065243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncoupling Relapse Reduction and Disability Progression: Evidence From Tolebrutinib Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Alessio Signori, Noemi Montobbio, Francesca Bovis, Marta Ponzano, Irene Schiavetti, Alessandra Krenn, Maria Pia Sormani\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the treatment effects of tolebrutinib on confirmed disability worsening (CDW) diverge from its effects on relapse prevention compared with other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted published effect estimates for annualized relapse rate (ARR) and CDW confirmed at 24 weeks from all phase 3 trials with teriflunomide as the active comparator: ASCLEPIOS (ofatumumab), OPTIMUM (ponesimod), ULTIMATE (ublituximab), EVOLUTION (evobrutinib), and GEMINI (tolebrutinib). When duplicate trials were available, pooled estimates were derived. Log-transformed estimates were used in a weighted linear regression of CDW vs ARR, with bubble size reflecting statistical precision. Tolebrutinib was excluded from the regression fit but displayed for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 4 DMTs other than tolebrutinib, a strong linear association was observed between treatment effects on ARR and CDW (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.997), indicating that disability benefit was generally proportional to relapse reduction. By contrast, tolebrutinib deviated from this relationship, with a hazard ratio for CDW of 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.95) despite a relapse rate ratio of 1.03 (95% CI 0.85-1.25).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Tolebrutinib was the only therapy to show a benefit on CDW without a measurable effect on relapses, highlighting a dissociation between disability worsening and relapse suppression not observed with other DMTs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"e200612\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13065243/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/4/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是评估与其他疾病改善疗法(dmt)相比,托勒布替尼对复发性多发性硬化症(MS)的治疗效果是否偏离其对残疾恶化(CDW)的预防效果。方法:我们从所有以泰瑞氟米特作为活性比较剂的3期试验中提取已发表的年化复发率(ARR)和24周时确认的CDW的效果估计:ASCLEPIOS (ofatumumab)、OPTIMUM (ponesimod)、ULTIMATE (ublituximab)、EVOLUTION (evobrutinib)和GEMINI (tolebrutinib)。当有重复试验时,得出汇总估计。对数变换估计用于CDW与ARR的加权线性回归,气泡大小反映统计精度。托勒布替尼被排除在回归拟合之外,但显示用于比较。结果:除托勒布替尼外,在4个dmt中,治疗效果对ARR和CDW之间存在很强的线性关联(R2 = 0.997),表明残疾获益通常与复发减少成正比。相比之下,托勒布替尼偏离了这一关系,尽管复发率为1.03 (95% CI 0.85-1.25),但CDW的风险比为0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.95)。讨论:托勒布替尼是唯一一种显示对CDW有益但对复发没有可测量影响的治疗方法,突出了残疾恶化和复发抑制之间的分离,这在其他dmt中没有观察到。
Uncoupling Relapse Reduction and Disability Progression: Evidence From Tolebrutinib Studies.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the treatment effects of tolebrutinib on confirmed disability worsening (CDW) diverge from its effects on relapse prevention compared with other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS).
Methods: We extracted published effect estimates for annualized relapse rate (ARR) and CDW confirmed at 24 weeks from all phase 3 trials with teriflunomide as the active comparator: ASCLEPIOS (ofatumumab), OPTIMUM (ponesimod), ULTIMATE (ublituximab), EVOLUTION (evobrutinib), and GEMINI (tolebrutinib). When duplicate trials were available, pooled estimates were derived. Log-transformed estimates were used in a weighted linear regression of CDW vs ARR, with bubble size reflecting statistical precision. Tolebrutinib was excluded from the regression fit but displayed for comparison.
Results: Across 4 DMTs other than tolebrutinib, a strong linear association was observed between treatment effects on ARR and CDW (R2 = 0.997), indicating that disability benefit was generally proportional to relapse reduction. By contrast, tolebrutinib deviated from this relationship, with a hazard ratio for CDW of 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.95) despite a relapse rate ratio of 1.03 (95% CI 0.85-1.25).
Discussion: Tolebrutinib was the only therapy to show a benefit on CDW without a measurable effect on relapses, highlighting a dissociation between disability worsening and relapse suppression not observed with other DMTs.
期刊介绍:
Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.