军事创伤后应激障碍的执行功能障碍与生态睡眠评估:一项横断面研究。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Gilles Sipahimalani, Fabien Sauvet, Michael Quiquempoix, Dorone Feingold, Clémentine Jacques, Mathias Guillard, Bertrand Lahutte, Mounir Chennaoui, Emeric Saguin
{"title":"军事创伤后应激障碍的执行功能障碍与生态睡眠评估:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Gilles Sipahimalani, Fabien Sauvet, Michael Quiquempoix, Dorone Feingold, Clémentine Jacques, Mathias Guillard, Bertrand Lahutte, Mounir Chennaoui, Emeric Saguin","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is consistently linked to deficits in executive functions, including attention, working memory, and inhibitory control, which impact clinical outcomes. This study examined these cognitive functions in military personnel with PTSD and its associations with clinical symptoms and objective sleep parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>French active-duty and veteran service members with PTSD (n = 130) and healthy military controls (n = 65) completed computerized cognitive tasks: inhibition (Go/No-Go), sustained attention (0-Back), and working memory (2-Back). Sleep was monitored under ecological conditions using a polysomnographic headband. Clinical assessments included PTSD severity (PCL-5) and depression (BDI). Efficiency scores combining accuracy and speed were calculated for each task. Group comparisons, correlations, and multiple regressions were conducted. Executive impairment thresholds were derived from the controls to estimate prevalence in the PTSD group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PTSD participants showed lower performance across the three cognitive tasks. Using normative thresholds, 36.6% met criteria for executive impairment. In the PTSD group, clinical and sleep variables explained only a small proportion of the variance in cognitive performance (R² = 0.12), with REM sleep and PTSD severity showing the largest albeit modest contributions. In contrast, predictors explained a greater proportion of variance in controls (R² = 0.35), suggesting stronger predictive utility. Exploratory analyses indicated that medication burden was the strongest individual predictor of executive performance in PTSD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Executive dysfunction is frequent among military personnel with PTSD and only partially explained by standard clinical and sleep measures. Cognitive impairment likely reflects multiple interacting mechanisms not captured by standard assessments, underscoring the need for integrative and multimodal approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"362 ","pages":"117211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Executive dysfunction in military PTSD with ecological sleep assessment: A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Gilles Sipahimalani, Fabien Sauvet, Michael Quiquempoix, Dorone Feingold, Clémentine Jacques, Mathias Guillard, Bertrand Lahutte, Mounir Chennaoui, Emeric Saguin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is consistently linked to deficits in executive functions, including attention, working memory, and inhibitory control, which impact clinical outcomes. This study examined these cognitive functions in military personnel with PTSD and its associations with clinical symptoms and objective sleep parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>French active-duty and veteran service members with PTSD (n = 130) and healthy military controls (n = 65) completed computerized cognitive tasks: inhibition (Go/No-Go), sustained attention (0-Back), and working memory (2-Back). Sleep was monitored under ecological conditions using a polysomnographic headband. Clinical assessments included PTSD severity (PCL-5) and depression (BDI). Efficiency scores combining accuracy and speed were calculated for each task. Group comparisons, correlations, and multiple regressions were conducted. Executive impairment thresholds were derived from the controls to estimate prevalence in the PTSD group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PTSD participants showed lower performance across the three cognitive tasks. Using normative thresholds, 36.6% met criteria for executive impairment. In the PTSD group, clinical and sleep variables explained only a small proportion of the variance in cognitive performance (R² = 0.12), with REM sleep and PTSD severity showing the largest albeit modest contributions. In contrast, predictors explained a greater proportion of variance in controls (R² = 0.35), suggesting stronger predictive utility. Exploratory analyses indicated that medication burden was the strongest individual predictor of executive performance in PTSD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Executive dysfunction is frequent among military personnel with PTSD and only partially explained by standard clinical and sleep measures. Cognitive impairment likely reflects multiple interacting mechanisms not captured by standard assessments, underscoring the need for integrative and multimodal approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Research\",\"volume\":\"362 \",\"pages\":\"117211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117211\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)一直与执行功能缺陷有关,包括注意力、工作记忆和抑制控制,这些缺陷影响临床结果。本研究考察了PTSD军人的这些认知功能及其与临床症状和客观睡眠参数的关系。方法:法国现役和退伍军人PTSD患者(n = 130)和健康军人对照组(n = 65)完成计算机认知任务:抑制(Go/No-Go)、持续注意(0-Back)和工作记忆(2-Back)。在生态条件下使用多导睡眠仪头带监测睡眠。临床评估包括PTSD严重程度(PCL-5)和抑郁程度(BDI)。结合准确率和速度计算每个任务的效率分数。进行组间比较、相关性和多元回归分析。执行障碍阈值来自对照组,以估计PTSD组的患病率。结果:PTSD参与者在三项认知任务中表现较差。使用标准阈值,36.6%的人符合执行障碍的标准。在PTSD组中,临床和睡眠变量只解释了认知表现差异的一小部分(R²= 0.12),快速眼动睡眠和PTSD严重程度显示出最大的贡献,尽管贡献不大。相比之下,预测因子在对照中解释了更大比例的方差(R²= 0.35),表明更强的预测效用。探索性分析表明,药物负担是PTSD患者执行绩效的最强个体预测因子。结论:执行功能障碍在PTSD军人中很常见,仅能部分解释标准临床和睡眠测量。认知障碍可能反映了标准评估未捕获的多种相互作用机制,强调了综合和多模式方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Executive dysfunction in military PTSD with ecological sleep assessment: A cross-sectional study.

Background: Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is consistently linked to deficits in executive functions, including attention, working memory, and inhibitory control, which impact clinical outcomes. This study examined these cognitive functions in military personnel with PTSD and its associations with clinical symptoms and objective sleep parameters.

Methods: French active-duty and veteran service members with PTSD (n = 130) and healthy military controls (n = 65) completed computerized cognitive tasks: inhibition (Go/No-Go), sustained attention (0-Back), and working memory (2-Back). Sleep was monitored under ecological conditions using a polysomnographic headband. Clinical assessments included PTSD severity (PCL-5) and depression (BDI). Efficiency scores combining accuracy and speed were calculated for each task. Group comparisons, correlations, and multiple regressions were conducted. Executive impairment thresholds were derived from the controls to estimate prevalence in the PTSD group.

Results: PTSD participants showed lower performance across the three cognitive tasks. Using normative thresholds, 36.6% met criteria for executive impairment. In the PTSD group, clinical and sleep variables explained only a small proportion of the variance in cognitive performance (R² = 0.12), with REM sleep and PTSD severity showing the largest albeit modest contributions. In contrast, predictors explained a greater proportion of variance in controls (R² = 0.35), suggesting stronger predictive utility. Exploratory analyses indicated that medication burden was the strongest individual predictor of executive performance in PTSD.

Conclusion: Executive dysfunction is frequent among military personnel with PTSD and only partially explained by standard clinical and sleep measures. Cognitive impairment likely reflects multiple interacting mechanisms not captured by standard assessments, underscoring the need for integrative and multimodal approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research
Psychiatry Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
527
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry. The scope of the journal encompasses: Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders. Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders. Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases. Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments. Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders. Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书