鼠尾草种子的蛋白质质量和致敏性评价:一种新型食品安全的分子视角。

IF 4.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Frontiers in toxicology Pub Date : 2026-04-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ftox.2026.1735718
Luisa Calcinai, Sara Cutroneo, Ilaria Puxeddu, Simon Dirr, Özlem Özmutlu Karslioglu, Tullia Tedeschi
{"title":"鼠尾草种子的蛋白质质量和致敏性评价:一种新型食品安全的分子视角。","authors":"Luisa Calcinai, Sara Cutroneo, Ilaria Puxeddu, Simon Dirr, Özlem Özmutlu Karslioglu, Tullia Tedeschi","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2026.1735718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the protein quality and allergenic potential of chia seeds (<i>Salvia hispanica</i>), introduced in European market as a novel food (Regulation European Union 2015/2283) in 2019. Although chia is increasingly used as a plant-based ingredient, information regarding its protein profile and sequences is still limited. It follows that, without this essential knowledge, information of its allergenic potential is also lacking. Therefore, this work pose itself as a first building block, providing a detailed molecular characterisation of chia proteins and evaluating their allergenic potential and IgE cross-reactivity with other known allergens, such as sesame (<i>Sesamum indicum</i>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three chia flour samples-partial defatted flour as reference, standardised partial defatted flour, and protein concentrate-were analysed. Protein content was determined by Kjeldahl method. Protein quality was evaluated based on the amino acid profile and the estimation of amino acid score. Proteins were identified by SDS-PAGE through comparison with existing literature and then confirmed by in solution tryptic digestion coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis. Allergenicity was assessed by <i>in silico</i> sequence homology analysis with characterised sesame linear epitopes and <i>in vitro</i> immunoblotting using sera from sesame-allergic patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The protein content ranged from 25% to 26% in the raw materials to 56% in the concentrate. Furthermore, SDS-PAGE profiles were comparable between samples, confirming the effectiveness of the extraction method applied. All samples showed balanced amino acid profiles and amino acid scores above one, meeting FAO/WHO requirements for adults and children. The main proteins identified in chia were 11S and 7S globulins, albumins and oleosins. The identified chia peptides were used to obtain a coverage of these with sesame protein sequences, confirming the attended homology. The potential cross-reactivity with sesame proteins, primarily retrieved from the literature, was then confirmed <i>in vitro</i>. IgE-binding was detected for major chia proteins, such as 11S and 7S globulin, and 2S albumin endorsing the attended cross-reactivity with sesame proteins.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provided insights on the effectiveness of the extraction method applied on chia protein quality, which is essential for their inclusion in balanced food formulations. The approach used for assessing allergenicity also highlighted that the level of molecular and immunological knowledge can differ among novel foods, making it challenging to define a general methodological framework for evaluating their allergenic potential and cross-reactivity risks. These results can be useful both as starting point for the inclusion of protein extracts from chia seeds as safe ingredient, while also highlighting the current lack of comprehensive molecular characterization-including incomplete sequence data and uncharacterized potential epitopes-which limits the full assessment of their allergenic risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":73111,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in toxicology","volume":"8 ","pages":"1735718"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13135838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protein quality and allergenicity assessment of chia seeds (<i>Salvia hispanica</i>): a molecular perspective on novel food safety.\",\"authors\":\"Luisa Calcinai, Sara Cutroneo, Ilaria Puxeddu, Simon Dirr, Özlem Özmutlu Karslioglu, Tullia Tedeschi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ftox.2026.1735718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the protein quality and allergenic potential of chia seeds (<i>Salvia hispanica</i>), introduced in European market as a novel food (Regulation European Union 2015/2283) in 2019. Although chia is increasingly used as a plant-based ingredient, information regarding its protein profile and sequences is still limited. It follows that, without this essential knowledge, information of its allergenic potential is also lacking. Therefore, this work pose itself as a first building block, providing a detailed molecular characterisation of chia proteins and evaluating their allergenic potential and IgE cross-reactivity with other known allergens, such as sesame (<i>Sesamum indicum</i>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three chia flour samples-partial defatted flour as reference, standardised partial defatted flour, and protein concentrate-were analysed. Protein content was determined by Kjeldahl method. Protein quality was evaluated based on the amino acid profile and the estimation of amino acid score. Proteins were identified by SDS-PAGE through comparison with existing literature and then confirmed by in solution tryptic digestion coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis. Allergenicity was assessed by <i>in silico</i> sequence homology analysis with characterised sesame linear epitopes and <i>in vitro</i> immunoblotting using sera from sesame-allergic patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The protein content ranged from 25% to 26% in the raw materials to 56% in the concentrate. Furthermore, SDS-PAGE profiles were comparable between samples, confirming the effectiveness of the extraction method applied. All samples showed balanced amino acid profiles and amino acid scores above one, meeting FAO/WHO requirements for adults and children. The main proteins identified in chia were 11S and 7S globulins, albumins and oleosins. The identified chia peptides were used to obtain a coverage of these with sesame protein sequences, confirming the attended homology. The potential cross-reactivity with sesame proteins, primarily retrieved from the literature, was then confirmed <i>in vitro</i>. IgE-binding was detected for major chia proteins, such as 11S and 7S globulin, and 2S albumin endorsing the attended cross-reactivity with sesame proteins.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provided insights on the effectiveness of the extraction method applied on chia protein quality, which is essential for their inclusion in balanced food formulations. The approach used for assessing allergenicity also highlighted that the level of molecular and immunological knowledge can differ among novel foods, making it challenging to define a general methodological framework for evaluating their allergenic potential and cross-reactivity risks. These results can be useful both as starting point for the inclusion of protein extracts from chia seeds as safe ingredient, while also highlighting the current lack of comprehensive molecular characterization-including incomplete sequence data and uncharacterized potential epitopes-which limits the full assessment of their allergenic risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in toxicology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"1735718\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13135838/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2026.1735718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2026.1735718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估奇亚籽(Salvia hispanica)的蛋白质质量和致敏潜力,奇亚籽作为一种新型食品(欧盟法规2015/2283)于2019年进入欧洲市场。虽然奇亚籽越来越多地被用作植物性成分,但有关其蛋白质结构和序列的信息仍然有限。因此,如果没有这些基本的知识,关于其致敏潜力的信息也是缺乏的。因此,这项工作将自己作为第一个基石,提供了奇亚蛋白的详细分子特征,并评估了它们的致敏潜力和IgE与其他已知过敏原(如芝麻)的交叉反应性。方法:对部分脱脂面粉、部分脱脂标准化面粉和浓缩蛋白3种奇亚面粉样品进行分析。用凯氏定氮法测定蛋白质含量。根据氨基酸谱和氨基酸评分对蛋白质品质进行评价。通过与已有文献的比较,采用SDS-PAGE技术鉴定蛋白质,并结合高分辨率质谱分析,在溶液中进行胰酶消化鉴定。采用芝麻线性表位的硅序列同源性分析和芝麻过敏患者血清的体外免疫印迹法评估致敏性。结果:原料中蛋白质含量为25% ~ 26%,浓缩物中蛋白质含量为56%。此外,样品之间的SDS-PAGE谱具有可比性,证实了所采用提取方法的有效性。所有样品均显示氨基酸分布平衡,氨基酸得分在1以上,符合粮农组织/世卫组织对成人和儿童的要求。在中国鉴定的主要蛋白质是11S和7S球蛋白、白蛋白和油蛋白。鉴定的奇亚肽被用来获得这些与芝麻蛋白序列的覆盖范围,确认所参加的同源性。与芝麻蛋白的潜在交叉反应性,主要从文献中检索,然后在体外证实。主要的chia蛋白,如11S和7S球蛋白,以及2S白蛋白检测到ige结合,证实了与芝麻蛋白的交叉反应性。结论:本研究揭示了提取方法对奇亚蛋白质量的影响,这对其在均衡食品配方中的应用至关重要。用于评估致敏性的方法还强调,不同的新食物的分子和免疫学知识水平可能不同,因此很难确定一个通用的方法框架来评估它们的致敏潜力和交叉反应性风险。这些结果可以作为从奇亚籽中提取蛋白质作为安全成分的起点,同时也强调了目前缺乏全面的分子特征,包括不完整的序列数据和未表征的潜在表位,这限制了对其过敏风险的全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protein quality and allergenicity assessment of chia seeds (Salvia hispanica): a molecular perspective on novel food safety.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the protein quality and allergenic potential of chia seeds (Salvia hispanica), introduced in European market as a novel food (Regulation European Union 2015/2283) in 2019. Although chia is increasingly used as a plant-based ingredient, information regarding its protein profile and sequences is still limited. It follows that, without this essential knowledge, information of its allergenic potential is also lacking. Therefore, this work pose itself as a first building block, providing a detailed molecular characterisation of chia proteins and evaluating their allergenic potential and IgE cross-reactivity with other known allergens, such as sesame (Sesamum indicum).

Methods: Three chia flour samples-partial defatted flour as reference, standardised partial defatted flour, and protein concentrate-were analysed. Protein content was determined by Kjeldahl method. Protein quality was evaluated based on the amino acid profile and the estimation of amino acid score. Proteins were identified by SDS-PAGE through comparison with existing literature and then confirmed by in solution tryptic digestion coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis. Allergenicity was assessed by in silico sequence homology analysis with characterised sesame linear epitopes and in vitro immunoblotting using sera from sesame-allergic patients.

Results: The protein content ranged from 25% to 26% in the raw materials to 56% in the concentrate. Furthermore, SDS-PAGE profiles were comparable between samples, confirming the effectiveness of the extraction method applied. All samples showed balanced amino acid profiles and amino acid scores above one, meeting FAO/WHO requirements for adults and children. The main proteins identified in chia were 11S and 7S globulins, albumins and oleosins. The identified chia peptides were used to obtain a coverage of these with sesame protein sequences, confirming the attended homology. The potential cross-reactivity with sesame proteins, primarily retrieved from the literature, was then confirmed in vitro. IgE-binding was detected for major chia proteins, such as 11S and 7S globulin, and 2S albumin endorsing the attended cross-reactivity with sesame proteins.

Conclusion: This study provided insights on the effectiveness of the extraction method applied on chia protein quality, which is essential for their inclusion in balanced food formulations. The approach used for assessing allergenicity also highlighted that the level of molecular and immunological knowledge can differ among novel foods, making it challenging to define a general methodological framework for evaluating their allergenic potential and cross-reactivity risks. These results can be useful both as starting point for the inclusion of protein extracts from chia seeds as safe ingredient, while also highlighting the current lack of comprehensive molecular characterization-including incomplete sequence data and uncharacterized potential epitopes-which limits the full assessment of their allergenic risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书