无创呼吸机设备的呼吸道交叉感染(解除)。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
George T P Tay, Kimberley Smith, Congrong He, Brett Dyer, Rachel M Thomson, David W Reid, Lidia Morawska, Scott C Bell
{"title":"无创呼吸机设备的呼吸道交叉感染(解除)。","authors":"George T P Tay, Kimberley Smith, Congrong He, Brett Dyer, Rachel M Thomson, David W Reid, Lidia Morawska, Scott C Bell","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.04.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is considered an aerosol-generating procedure, yet the extent of the risk of airborne pathogen transmission remains uncertain. To address this, we conducted three studies assessing bioaerosol generation, device contamination, and cough-related dispersion during NIV.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Studies 1 and 2 utilised a purpose-designed rig supplied with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered air ensuring the detection of particles only produced by the NIV system. Study 3 utilises a flow-tunnel rig to compare aerosol dispersion during NIV, sham NIV, tidal breathing, and uncovered coughing.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>In the controlled laboratory setting (Study 1), NIV-generated aerosol particles were measured. Viable Pseudomonas aeruginosa was detected when inoculum concentrations were ≥1 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL, and the use of inline antibacterial filters prevented bacterial emission. In Study 2, demonstrated low risk of NIV device contamination (1 in 10) during short-term use. While in study 3, NIV with therapeutic pressure generated higher physical aerosol counts than tidal breathing or sham NIV, but less than with uncovered coughing. Among 13 participants, viable pathogens were detected in uncovered coughs from seven (54%) participants (median 9, IQR 3-12 CFU), while only one participant had a positive result during NIV (2 CFU with sham and 3 CFU with therapeutic NIV).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that NIV devices may be contaminated after use and can aerosolise viable bacteria. While the World Health Organization classifies NIV as a high-risk aerosol-generating procedure, we demonstrate low likelihood of infectious particle release, particularly when effective interfaces, leak control, and robust infection prevention measures are implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory Cross Infection in Non-Invasive Ventilator Devices (ResCIND).\",\"authors\":\"George T P Tay, Kimberley Smith, Congrong He, Brett Dyer, Rachel M Thomson, David W Reid, Lidia Morawska, Scott C Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.04.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is considered an aerosol-generating procedure, yet the extent of the risk of airborne pathogen transmission remains uncertain. To address this, we conducted three studies assessing bioaerosol generation, device contamination, and cough-related dispersion during NIV.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Studies 1 and 2 utilised a purpose-designed rig supplied with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered air ensuring the detection of particles only produced by the NIV system. Study 3 utilises a flow-tunnel rig to compare aerosol dispersion during NIV, sham NIV, tidal breathing, and uncovered coughing.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>In the controlled laboratory setting (Study 1), NIV-generated aerosol particles were measured. Viable Pseudomonas aeruginosa was detected when inoculum concentrations were ≥1 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL, and the use of inline antibacterial filters prevented bacterial emission. In Study 2, demonstrated low risk of NIV device contamination (1 in 10) during short-term use. While in study 3, NIV with therapeutic pressure generated higher physical aerosol counts than tidal breathing or sham NIV, but less than with uncovered coughing. Among 13 participants, viable pathogens were detected in uncovered coughs from seven (54%) participants (median 9, IQR 3-12 CFU), while only one participant had a positive result during NIV (2 CFU with sham and 3 CFU with therapeutic NIV).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that NIV devices may be contaminated after use and can aerosolise viable bacteria. While the World Health Organization classifies NIV as a high-risk aerosol-generating procedure, we demonstrate low likelihood of infectious particle release, particularly when effective interfaces, leak control, and robust infection prevention measures are implemented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.04.021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.04.021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无创通气(NIV)被认为是一种产生气溶胶的过程,但空气传播病原体的风险程度仍不确定。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了三项研究,评估了NIV期间生物气溶胶的产生、设备污染和咳嗽相关的扩散。方法:研究1和研究2使用了专门设计的装备,配备了高效微粒空气(HEPA)过滤空气,确保只检测由NIV系统产生的颗粒。研究3利用流动隧道装置比较无通气、假无通气、潮汐呼吸和无遮盖咳嗽期间的气溶胶分散。结果:在受控的实验室环境中(研究1),测量了niv产生的气溶胶颗粒。当接种浓度≥1 × 105 CFU/mL时,检测到铜绿假单胞菌的活菌,使用在线抗菌过滤器可防止细菌排放。在研究2中,显示短期使用NIV设备污染的风险较低(1 / 10)。而在研究3中,治疗压力下的NIV比潮汐呼吸或假NIV产生更高的物理气溶胶计数,但比不暴露的咳嗽少。在13名参与者中,有7名(54%)参与者(中位数9,IQR 3-12 CFU)在未覆盖的咳嗽中检测到活菌,而只有1名参与者在NIV期间检测到阳性结果(2名假性CFU和3名治疗性CFU)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,NIV设备在使用后可能被污染,并且可以雾化活菌。虽然世界卫生组织将NIV归类为高风险气溶胶产生程序,但我们证明感染性颗粒释放的可能性很低,特别是在有效的界面,泄漏控制和强有力的感染预防措施实施时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Respiratory Cross Infection in Non-Invasive Ventilator Devices (ResCIND).

Background: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is considered an aerosol-generating procedure, yet the extent of the risk of airborne pathogen transmission remains uncertain. To address this, we conducted three studies assessing bioaerosol generation, device contamination, and cough-related dispersion during NIV.

Method: Studies 1 and 2 utilised a purpose-designed rig supplied with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered air ensuring the detection of particles only produced by the NIV system. Study 3 utilises a flow-tunnel rig to compare aerosol dispersion during NIV, sham NIV, tidal breathing, and uncovered coughing.

Result: In the controlled laboratory setting (Study 1), NIV-generated aerosol particles were measured. Viable Pseudomonas aeruginosa was detected when inoculum concentrations were ≥1 × 105 CFU/mL, and the use of inline antibacterial filters prevented bacterial emission. In Study 2, demonstrated low risk of NIV device contamination (1 in 10) during short-term use. While in study 3, NIV with therapeutic pressure generated higher physical aerosol counts than tidal breathing or sham NIV, but less than with uncovered coughing. Among 13 participants, viable pathogens were detected in uncovered coughs from seven (54%) participants (median 9, IQR 3-12 CFU), while only one participant had a positive result during NIV (2 CFU with sham and 3 CFU with therapeutic NIV).

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that NIV devices may be contaminated after use and can aerosolise viable bacteria. While the World Health Organization classifies NIV as a high-risk aerosol-generating procedure, we demonstrate low likelihood of infectious particle release, particularly when effective interfaces, leak control, and robust infection prevention measures are implemented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书