George T P Tay, Kimberley Smith, Congrong He, Brett Dyer, Rachel M Thomson, David W Reid, Lidia Morawska, Scott C Bell
{"title":"无创呼吸机设备的呼吸道交叉感染(解除)。","authors":"George T P Tay, Kimberley Smith, Congrong He, Brett Dyer, Rachel M Thomson, David W Reid, Lidia Morawska, Scott C Bell","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.04.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is considered an aerosol-generating procedure, yet the extent of the risk of airborne pathogen transmission remains uncertain. To address this, we conducted three studies assessing bioaerosol generation, device contamination, and cough-related dispersion during NIV.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Studies 1 and 2 utilised a purpose-designed rig supplied with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered air ensuring the detection of particles only produced by the NIV system. Study 3 utilises a flow-tunnel rig to compare aerosol dispersion during NIV, sham NIV, tidal breathing, and uncovered coughing.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>In the controlled laboratory setting (Study 1), NIV-generated aerosol particles were measured. Viable Pseudomonas aeruginosa was detected when inoculum concentrations were ≥1 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL, and the use of inline antibacterial filters prevented bacterial emission. In Study 2, demonstrated low risk of NIV device contamination (1 in 10) during short-term use. While in study 3, NIV with therapeutic pressure generated higher physical aerosol counts than tidal breathing or sham NIV, but less than with uncovered coughing. Among 13 participants, viable pathogens were detected in uncovered coughs from seven (54%) participants (median 9, IQR 3-12 CFU), while only one participant had a positive result during NIV (2 CFU with sham and 3 CFU with therapeutic NIV).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that NIV devices may be contaminated after use and can aerosolise viable bacteria. While the World Health Organization classifies NIV as a high-risk aerosol-generating procedure, we demonstrate low likelihood of infectious particle release, particularly when effective interfaces, leak control, and robust infection prevention measures are implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory Cross Infection in Non-Invasive Ventilator Devices (ResCIND).\",\"authors\":\"George T P Tay, Kimberley Smith, Congrong He, Brett Dyer, Rachel M Thomson, David W Reid, Lidia Morawska, Scott C Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2026.04.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is considered an aerosol-generating procedure, yet the extent of the risk of airborne pathogen transmission remains uncertain. To address this, we conducted three studies assessing bioaerosol generation, device contamination, and cough-related dispersion during NIV.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Studies 1 and 2 utilised a purpose-designed rig supplied with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered air ensuring the detection of particles only produced by the NIV system. Study 3 utilises a flow-tunnel rig to compare aerosol dispersion during NIV, sham NIV, tidal breathing, and uncovered coughing.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>In the controlled laboratory setting (Study 1), NIV-generated aerosol particles were measured. Viable Pseudomonas aeruginosa was detected when inoculum concentrations were ≥1 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL, and the use of inline antibacterial filters prevented bacterial emission. In Study 2, demonstrated low risk of NIV device contamination (1 in 10) during short-term use. While in study 3, NIV with therapeutic pressure generated higher physical aerosol counts than tidal breathing or sham NIV, but less than with uncovered coughing. Among 13 participants, viable pathogens were detected in uncovered coughs from seven (54%) participants (median 9, IQR 3-12 CFU), while only one participant had a positive result during NIV (2 CFU with sham and 3 CFU with therapeutic NIV).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that NIV devices may be contaminated after use and can aerosolise viable bacteria. While the World Health Organization classifies NIV as a high-risk aerosol-generating procedure, we demonstrate low likelihood of infectious particle release, particularly when effective interfaces, leak control, and robust infection prevention measures are implemented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.04.021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2026.04.021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Respiratory Cross Infection in Non-Invasive Ventilator Devices (ResCIND).
Background: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is considered an aerosol-generating procedure, yet the extent of the risk of airborne pathogen transmission remains uncertain. To address this, we conducted three studies assessing bioaerosol generation, device contamination, and cough-related dispersion during NIV.
Method: Studies 1 and 2 utilised a purpose-designed rig supplied with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered air ensuring the detection of particles only produced by the NIV system. Study 3 utilises a flow-tunnel rig to compare aerosol dispersion during NIV, sham NIV, tidal breathing, and uncovered coughing.
Result: In the controlled laboratory setting (Study 1), NIV-generated aerosol particles were measured. Viable Pseudomonas aeruginosa was detected when inoculum concentrations were ≥1 × 105 CFU/mL, and the use of inline antibacterial filters prevented bacterial emission. In Study 2, demonstrated low risk of NIV device contamination (1 in 10) during short-term use. While in study 3, NIV with therapeutic pressure generated higher physical aerosol counts than tidal breathing or sham NIV, but less than with uncovered coughing. Among 13 participants, viable pathogens were detected in uncovered coughs from seven (54%) participants (median 9, IQR 3-12 CFU), while only one participant had a positive result during NIV (2 CFU with sham and 3 CFU with therapeutic NIV).
Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that NIV devices may be contaminated after use and can aerosolise viable bacteria. While the World Health Organization classifies NIV as a high-risk aerosol-generating procedure, we demonstrate low likelihood of infectious particle release, particularly when effective interfaces, leak control, and robust infection prevention measures are implemented.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.