超声神经调节揭示了前扣带皮层背侧和脑岛前部在学习中的独特作用。

IF 7.2 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
PLoS Biology Pub Date : 2026-05-05 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003767
Nomiki Koutsoumpari, Johannes Algermissen, Siti Nurbaya Yaakub, Hanneke Em den Ouden, Nadege Bault, Elsa Fouragnan
{"title":"超声神经调节揭示了前扣带皮层背侧和脑岛前部在学习中的独特作用。","authors":"Nomiki Koutsoumpari, Johannes Algermissen, Siti Nurbaya Yaakub, Hanneke Em den Ouden, Nadege Bault, Elsa Fouragnan","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3003767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pavlovian biases reflect how evolutionarily hard-wired tendencies-automatic approach toward reward cues and withdrawal from threat cues-can interfere with flexible, goal-directed action. Such biases arise through three mechanisms: (a) anticipated rewards energize action while anticipated punishments suppress it (response bias), (b) agents learn differently from actions than from inactions (learning bias), and (c) reward/punishment cues themselves drive repetitive behavior, independent of outcomes (perseveration bias). The neural origin of these biases is unclear. Past evidence suggests dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and anterior insula (aIns) as part of a \"reset network\" that rapidly responds to salient information and might contribute to these biases. We used transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) in 29 healthy participants to interfere with neural activity in these regions and test their causal role in a within-subject, counter-balanced design across three sessions (sham, TUS-dACC, TUS-aIns). Computational modeling revealed a functional differentiation of both regions in Pavlovian biases: while TUS to either region did not affect the response bias, TUS to the aIns decreased people's learning bias, while TUS to dACC increased participants' perseveration bias. Although the dACC and aIns are part of the same network and often co-activate during decision-making tasks, TUS interference reveals their distinct roles: the dACC mediates cue-dependent persistence while the aIns is critical for inferring whether outcomes are self-caused.</p>","PeriodicalId":49001,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Biology","volume":"24 5","pages":"e3003767"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13143107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound neuromodulation reveals distinct roles of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula in learning.\",\"authors\":\"Nomiki Koutsoumpari, Johannes Algermissen, Siti Nurbaya Yaakub, Hanneke Em den Ouden, Nadege Bault, Elsa Fouragnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pbio.3003767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pavlovian biases reflect how evolutionarily hard-wired tendencies-automatic approach toward reward cues and withdrawal from threat cues-can interfere with flexible, goal-directed action. Such biases arise through three mechanisms: (a) anticipated rewards energize action while anticipated punishments suppress it (response bias), (b) agents learn differently from actions than from inactions (learning bias), and (c) reward/punishment cues themselves drive repetitive behavior, independent of outcomes (perseveration bias). The neural origin of these biases is unclear. Past evidence suggests dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and anterior insula (aIns) as part of a \\\"reset network\\\" that rapidly responds to salient information and might contribute to these biases. We used transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) in 29 healthy participants to interfere with neural activity in these regions and test their causal role in a within-subject, counter-balanced design across three sessions (sham, TUS-dACC, TUS-aIns). Computational modeling revealed a functional differentiation of both regions in Pavlovian biases: while TUS to either region did not affect the response bias, TUS to the aIns decreased people's learning bias, while TUS to dACC increased participants' perseveration bias. Although the dACC and aIns are part of the same network and often co-activate during decision-making tasks, TUS interference reveals their distinct roles: the dACC mediates cue-dependent persistence while the aIns is critical for inferring whether outcomes are self-caused.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Biology\",\"volume\":\"24 5\",\"pages\":\"e3003767\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13143107/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003767\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2026/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003767","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

巴甫洛夫偏见反映了进化上固有的倾向——对奖励线索的自动接近和对威胁线索的回避——如何干扰灵活的、目标导向的行动。这种偏差通过三种机制产生:(a)预期奖励激励行动,而预期惩罚抑制行动(反应偏差),(b)主体从行动和不行动中学习的方式不同(学习偏差),以及(c)奖励/惩罚线索本身驱动重复行为,独立于结果(持久性偏差)。这些偏见的神经起源尚不清楚。过去的证据表明,背前扣带皮层(dACC)和前岛叶(aIns)是“重置网络”的一部分,对重要信息做出快速反应,可能导致这些偏见。我们在29名健康参与者中使用经颅超声刺激(TUS)来干扰这些区域的神经活动,并在三个阶段(假手术、TUS- dacc、TUS- ains)的受试者内部平衡设计中测试其因果作用。计算模型揭示了两个区域在巴甫洛夫偏差中的功能分化:对任何一个区域的TUS都不影响反应偏差,对aIns的TUS降低了人们的学习偏差,而对dACC的TUS增加了参与者的坚持偏差。尽管dACC和ais是同一网络的一部分,并且经常在决策任务中共同激活,但TUS干扰揭示了它们的不同作用:dACC介导线索依赖的持久性,而ais对于推断结果是否由自身引起至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound neuromodulation reveals distinct roles of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula in learning.

Pavlovian biases reflect how evolutionarily hard-wired tendencies-automatic approach toward reward cues and withdrawal from threat cues-can interfere with flexible, goal-directed action. Such biases arise through three mechanisms: (a) anticipated rewards energize action while anticipated punishments suppress it (response bias), (b) agents learn differently from actions than from inactions (learning bias), and (c) reward/punishment cues themselves drive repetitive behavior, independent of outcomes (perseveration bias). The neural origin of these biases is unclear. Past evidence suggests dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and anterior insula (aIns) as part of a "reset network" that rapidly responds to salient information and might contribute to these biases. We used transcranial ultrasonic stimulation (TUS) in 29 healthy participants to interfere with neural activity in these regions and test their causal role in a within-subject, counter-balanced design across three sessions (sham, TUS-dACC, TUS-aIns). Computational modeling revealed a functional differentiation of both regions in Pavlovian biases: while TUS to either region did not affect the response bias, TUS to the aIns decreased people's learning bias, while TUS to dACC increased participants' perseveration bias. Although the dACC and aIns are part of the same network and often co-activate during decision-making tasks, TUS interference reveals their distinct roles: the dACC mediates cue-dependent persistence while the aIns is critical for inferring whether outcomes are self-caused.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Biology
PLoS Biology BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-BIOLOGY
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
359
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Biology is the flagship journal of the Public Library of Science (PLOS) and focuses on publishing groundbreaking and relevant research in all areas of biological science. The journal features works at various scales, ranging from molecules to ecosystems, and also encourages interdisciplinary studies. PLOS Biology publishes articles that demonstrate exceptional significance, originality, and relevance, with a high standard of scientific rigor in methodology, reporting, and conclusions. The journal aims to advance science and serve the research community by transforming research communication to align with the research process. It offers evolving article types and policies that empower authors to share the complete story behind their scientific findings with a diverse global audience of researchers, educators, policymakers, patient advocacy groups, and the general public. PLOS Biology, along with other PLOS journals, is widely indexed by major services such as Crossref, Dimensions, DOAJ, Google Scholar, PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, PLOS Biology is indexed by various other services including AGRICOLA, Biological Abstracts, BIOSYS Previews, CABI CAB Abstracts, CABI Global Health, CAPES, CAS, CNKI, Embase, Journal Guide, MEDLINE, and Zoological Record, ensuring that the research content is easily accessible and discoverable by a wide range of audiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书