我们如何在北美的医院使用智能血液冰箱?

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2026-05-07 DOI:10.1111/trf.70259
Alexandra Jimenez, Dennis Chen, Jaclyn Spinelli, Stephanie Kinney, Rebecca Coward, Althea Rossier, Monique Huggins, Bruce Lyon, Denden Benabdessadek, Sabrina Racine-Brzostek, Robert A DeSimone, Tobias Cohen, Melissa M Cushing
{"title":"我们如何在北美的医院使用智能血液冰箱?","authors":"Alexandra Jimenez, Dennis Chen, Jaclyn Spinelli, Stephanie Kinney, Rebecca Coward, Althea Rossier, Monique Huggins, Bruce Lyon, Denden Benabdessadek, Sabrina Racine-Brzostek, Robert A DeSimone, Tobias Cohen, Melissa M Cushing","doi":"10.1111/trf.70259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid, reliable, and safe access to blood products remains a persistent operational challenge in transfusion medicine, particularly in high-acuity and geographically dispersed clinical environments. Traditional centralized blood bank workflows may contribute to delays, increased laboratory workload, and risks associated with blood component transportation and storage. Smart blood refrigerators have emerged as an important strategy to support decentralized storage, controlled product access, and enhanced traceability; however, published data describing real-world implementation strategies and operational variability remain limited.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>To characterize real-world adoption and use, we conducted a multi-institutional survey of North American institutions utilizing BloodTrack-integrated smart blood refrigerators. Survey findings were supplemented by targeted follow-up interviews representing a range of operational models and use cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey responses demonstrated substantial variability in deployment models, clinical workflows, and blood component storage practices. Smart refrigerators supported a wide range of transfusion service functions across diverse clinical environments, reflecting differing institutional, operational, and patient-care priorities. Commonly reported benefits included shorter time to transfusion, improved workflow efficiency, enhanced traceability, reduced staffing burden, and support for patient-specific blood product selection. Reported barriers primarily involved informatics integration, labeling workflows, serologic eligibility constraints, and training considerations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings illustrate how smart blood refrigerators are used across diverse transfusion service environments, highlighting the operational flexibility of these systems and providing practical insights for institutions seeking to implement, optimize, or expand smart refrigerator-supported transfusion workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do we use smart blood refrigerators at our hospitals in North America?\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Jimenez, Dennis Chen, Jaclyn Spinelli, Stephanie Kinney, Rebecca Coward, Althea Rossier, Monique Huggins, Bruce Lyon, Denden Benabdessadek, Sabrina Racine-Brzostek, Robert A DeSimone, Tobias Cohen, Melissa M Cushing\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/trf.70259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid, reliable, and safe access to blood products remains a persistent operational challenge in transfusion medicine, particularly in high-acuity and geographically dispersed clinical environments. Traditional centralized blood bank workflows may contribute to delays, increased laboratory workload, and risks associated with blood component transportation and storage. Smart blood refrigerators have emerged as an important strategy to support decentralized storage, controlled product access, and enhanced traceability; however, published data describing real-world implementation strategies and operational variability remain limited.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>To characterize real-world adoption and use, we conducted a multi-institutional survey of North American institutions utilizing BloodTrack-integrated smart blood refrigerators. Survey findings were supplemented by targeted follow-up interviews representing a range of operational models and use cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey responses demonstrated substantial variability in deployment models, clinical workflows, and blood component storage practices. Smart refrigerators supported a wide range of transfusion service functions across diverse clinical environments, reflecting differing institutional, operational, and patient-care priorities. Commonly reported benefits included shorter time to transfusion, improved workflow efficiency, enhanced traceability, reduced staffing burden, and support for patient-specific blood product selection. Reported barriers primarily involved informatics integration, labeling workflows, serologic eligibility constraints, and training considerations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings illustrate how smart blood refrigerators are used across diverse transfusion service environments, highlighting the operational flexibility of these systems and providing practical insights for institutions seeking to implement, optimize, or expand smart refrigerator-supported transfusion workflows.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfusion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfusion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70259\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:快速、可靠和安全获取血液制品仍然是输血医学中持续存在的操作挑战,特别是在高灵敏度和地理分散的临床环境中。传统的集中式血库工作流程可能导致延误,增加实验室工作量,以及与血液成分运输和储存相关的风险。智能血液冰箱已成为支持分散存储、受控产品访问和增强可追溯性的重要策略;然而,描述现实世界实施策略和操作可变性的公开数据仍然有限。研究设计和方法:为了描述现实世界的采用和使用情况,我们对使用集成了bloodtrack的智能血液冰箱的北美机构进行了多机构调查。有针对性的后续访谈补充了调查结果,代表了一系列操作模型和用例。结果:调查结果表明,部署模型、临床工作流程和血液成分储存实践存在实质性差异。智能冰箱在不同的临床环境中支持广泛的输血服务功能,反映了不同的机构、操作和患者护理优先事项。通常报告的好处包括缩短输血时间,提高工作效率,增强可追溯性,减少人员负担,并支持针对患者的血液制品选择。报告的障碍主要涉及信息学集成、标记工作流程、血清学资格限制和培训考虑。结论:这些发现说明了智能血液冰箱是如何在不同的输血服务环境中使用的,突出了这些系统的操作灵活性,并为寻求实施、优化或扩展智能冰箱支持的输血工作流程的机构提供了实用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do we use smart blood refrigerators at our hospitals in North America?

Background: Rapid, reliable, and safe access to blood products remains a persistent operational challenge in transfusion medicine, particularly in high-acuity and geographically dispersed clinical environments. Traditional centralized blood bank workflows may contribute to delays, increased laboratory workload, and risks associated with blood component transportation and storage. Smart blood refrigerators have emerged as an important strategy to support decentralized storage, controlled product access, and enhanced traceability; however, published data describing real-world implementation strategies and operational variability remain limited.

Study design and methods: To characterize real-world adoption and use, we conducted a multi-institutional survey of North American institutions utilizing BloodTrack-integrated smart blood refrigerators. Survey findings were supplemented by targeted follow-up interviews representing a range of operational models and use cases.

Results: Survey responses demonstrated substantial variability in deployment models, clinical workflows, and blood component storage practices. Smart refrigerators supported a wide range of transfusion service functions across diverse clinical environments, reflecting differing institutional, operational, and patient-care priorities. Commonly reported benefits included shorter time to transfusion, improved workflow efficiency, enhanced traceability, reduced staffing burden, and support for patient-specific blood product selection. Reported barriers primarily involved informatics integration, labeling workflows, serologic eligibility constraints, and training considerations.

Conclusion: These findings illustrate how smart blood refrigerators are used across diverse transfusion service environments, highlighting the operational flexibility of these systems and providing practical insights for institutions seeking to implement, optimize, or expand smart refrigerator-supported transfusion workflows.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书