{"title":"对接受肠内和肠外营养的家庭进行经济稳定和心理健康评估的调查。","authors":"Gabriela Gardner, Ryan Butcher, Brooks D Cash","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The landscape of nutrition support faces challenges, including rising costs, product shortages, reimbursement gaps, and infusion providers closing. This nationwide survey aimed to describe the perceptions and attitudes related to costs, therapy access, and mental health among households with at least one family member requiring enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, or a combination of the two.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 10-item online survey was available for 8 weeks to households of adult (>18 years old) and pediatric patients (1-17 years old) currently receiving or who had received enteral or parenteral nutrition at home within the past 12 months. The survey explored beliefs and attitudes regarding financial impact, access to care, food security, coping mechanisms, and mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 182 participants, 42.9% were on enteral nutrition, 32.4% were on parenteral nutrition, and 24.7% were both. Overall, 52% reported a degree of financial concern due to nutrition therapy costs. About 51% of families described difficulties obtaining nutrition therapy related to cost or insurance coverage. A total of 52.7% of households reported worrying about food security. Over half, 63.7%, reported an impact on their mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support that various factors, including the cost of therapy, can negatively impact the economic stability and mental health of families with a member on enteral or parenteral nutrition. These findings highlight the importance of screening for social determinants of health to identify opportunities for intervention through the provision of additional resources and patient advocacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey to assess the economic stability and mental health of households with people receiving enteral and parenteral nutrition.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Gardner, Ryan Butcher, Brooks D Cash\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ncp.70133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The landscape of nutrition support faces challenges, including rising costs, product shortages, reimbursement gaps, and infusion providers closing. This nationwide survey aimed to describe the perceptions and attitudes related to costs, therapy access, and mental health among households with at least one family member requiring enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, or a combination of the two.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 10-item online survey was available for 8 weeks to households of adult (>18 years old) and pediatric patients (1-17 years old) currently receiving or who had received enteral or parenteral nutrition at home within the past 12 months. The survey explored beliefs and attitudes regarding financial impact, access to care, food security, coping mechanisms, and mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 182 participants, 42.9% were on enteral nutrition, 32.4% were on parenteral nutrition, and 24.7% were both. Overall, 52% reported a degree of financial concern due to nutrition therapy costs. About 51% of families described difficulties obtaining nutrition therapy related to cost or insurance coverage. A total of 52.7% of households reported worrying about food security. Over half, 63.7%, reported an impact on their mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support that various factors, including the cost of therapy, can negatively impact the economic stability and mental health of families with a member on enteral or parenteral nutrition. These findings highlight the importance of screening for social determinants of health to identify opportunities for intervention through the provision of additional resources and patient advocacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.70133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.70133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Survey to assess the economic stability and mental health of households with people receiving enteral and parenteral nutrition.
Background: The landscape of nutrition support faces challenges, including rising costs, product shortages, reimbursement gaps, and infusion providers closing. This nationwide survey aimed to describe the perceptions and attitudes related to costs, therapy access, and mental health among households with at least one family member requiring enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, or a combination of the two.
Methods: A 10-item online survey was available for 8 weeks to households of adult (>18 years old) and pediatric patients (1-17 years old) currently receiving or who had received enteral or parenteral nutrition at home within the past 12 months. The survey explored beliefs and attitudes regarding financial impact, access to care, food security, coping mechanisms, and mental health.
Results: Of the 182 participants, 42.9% were on enteral nutrition, 32.4% were on parenteral nutrition, and 24.7% were both. Overall, 52% reported a degree of financial concern due to nutrition therapy costs. About 51% of families described difficulties obtaining nutrition therapy related to cost or insurance coverage. A total of 52.7% of households reported worrying about food security. Over half, 63.7%, reported an impact on their mental health.
Conclusion: Our findings support that various factors, including the cost of therapy, can negatively impact the economic stability and mental health of families with a member on enteral or parenteral nutrition. These findings highlight the importance of screening for social determinants of health to identify opportunities for intervention through the provision of additional resources and patient advocacy.
期刊介绍:
NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).