对接受肠内和肠外营养的家庭进行经济稳定和心理健康评估的调查。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Gabriela Gardner, Ryan Butcher, Brooks D Cash
{"title":"对接受肠内和肠外营养的家庭进行经济稳定和心理健康评估的调查。","authors":"Gabriela Gardner, Ryan Butcher, Brooks D Cash","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The landscape of nutrition support faces challenges, including rising costs, product shortages, reimbursement gaps, and infusion providers closing. This nationwide survey aimed to describe the perceptions and attitudes related to costs, therapy access, and mental health among households with at least one family member requiring enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, or a combination of the two.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 10-item online survey was available for 8 weeks to households of adult (>18 years old) and pediatric patients (1-17 years old) currently receiving or who had received enteral or parenteral nutrition at home within the past 12 months. The survey explored beliefs and attitudes regarding financial impact, access to care, food security, coping mechanisms, and mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 182 participants, 42.9% were on enteral nutrition, 32.4% were on parenteral nutrition, and 24.7% were both. Overall, 52% reported a degree of financial concern due to nutrition therapy costs. About 51% of families described difficulties obtaining nutrition therapy related to cost or insurance coverage. A total of 52.7% of households reported worrying about food security. Over half, 63.7%, reported an impact on their mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support that various factors, including the cost of therapy, can negatively impact the economic stability and mental health of families with a member on enteral or parenteral nutrition. These findings highlight the importance of screening for social determinants of health to identify opportunities for intervention through the provision of additional resources and patient advocacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey to assess the economic stability and mental health of households with people receiving enteral and parenteral nutrition.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Gardner, Ryan Butcher, Brooks D Cash\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ncp.70133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The landscape of nutrition support faces challenges, including rising costs, product shortages, reimbursement gaps, and infusion providers closing. This nationwide survey aimed to describe the perceptions and attitudes related to costs, therapy access, and mental health among households with at least one family member requiring enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, or a combination of the two.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 10-item online survey was available for 8 weeks to households of adult (>18 years old) and pediatric patients (1-17 years old) currently receiving or who had received enteral or parenteral nutrition at home within the past 12 months. The survey explored beliefs and attitudes regarding financial impact, access to care, food security, coping mechanisms, and mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 182 participants, 42.9% were on enteral nutrition, 32.4% were on parenteral nutrition, and 24.7% were both. Overall, 52% reported a degree of financial concern due to nutrition therapy costs. About 51% of families described difficulties obtaining nutrition therapy related to cost or insurance coverage. A total of 52.7% of households reported worrying about food security. Over half, 63.7%, reported an impact on their mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings support that various factors, including the cost of therapy, can negatively impact the economic stability and mental health of families with a member on enteral or parenteral nutrition. These findings highlight the importance of screening for social determinants of health to identify opportunities for intervention through the provision of additional resources and patient advocacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.70133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.70133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:营养支持的前景面临挑战,包括成本上升,产品短缺,报销差距,输液提供者关闭。这项全国性调查旨在描述至少有一名家庭成员需要肠内营养、肠外营养或两者结合的家庭对费用、治疗途径和心理健康的看法和态度。方法:对正在接受或在过去12个月内在家中接受过肠内或肠外营养的成人(0 ~ 18岁)和儿科患者(1 ~ 17岁)的家庭进行为期8周的10项在线调查。这项调查探讨了人们对财务影响、获得医疗服务、粮食安全、应对机制和心理健康的看法和态度。结果:182例患者中,采用肠内营养者占42.9%,采用肠外营养者占32.4%,两者兼用者占24.7%。总体而言,52%的人表示对营养治疗费用有一定程度的经济担忧。大约51%的家庭描述了与费用或保险范围有关的获得营养治疗的困难。共有52.7%的家庭表示对食品安全感到担忧。超过一半(63.7%)的人表示,他们的心理健康受到了影响。结论:我们的研究结果支持各种因素,包括治疗费用,会对有成员接受肠内或肠外营养的家庭的经济稳定和心理健康产生负面影响。这些发现强调了筛查健康的社会决定因素的重要性,以便通过提供额外资源和患者宣传来确定进行干预的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survey to assess the economic stability and mental health of households with people receiving enteral and parenteral nutrition.

Background: The landscape of nutrition support faces challenges, including rising costs, product shortages, reimbursement gaps, and infusion providers closing. This nationwide survey aimed to describe the perceptions and attitudes related to costs, therapy access, and mental health among households with at least one family member requiring enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, or a combination of the two.

Methods: A 10-item online survey was available for 8 weeks to households of adult (>18 years old) and pediatric patients (1-17 years old) currently receiving or who had received enteral or parenteral nutrition at home within the past 12 months. The survey explored beliefs and attitudes regarding financial impact, access to care, food security, coping mechanisms, and mental health.

Results: Of the 182 participants, 42.9% were on enteral nutrition, 32.4% were on parenteral nutrition, and 24.7% were both. Overall, 52% reported a degree of financial concern due to nutrition therapy costs. About 51% of families described difficulties obtaining nutrition therapy related to cost or insurance coverage. A total of 52.7% of households reported worrying about food security. Over half, 63.7%, reported an impact on their mental health.

Conclusion: Our findings support that various factors, including the cost of therapy, can negatively impact the economic stability and mental health of families with a member on enteral or parenteral nutrition. These findings highlight the importance of screening for social determinants of health to identify opportunities for intervention through the provision of additional resources and patient advocacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书