Noa Antonissen, Steven Schalekamp, Horst K Hahn, Kicky G van Leeuwen, Colin Jacobs
{"title":"用于CT肺癌筛查的商业AI:产品能力、结节管理任务的覆盖范围和支持证据。","authors":"Noa Antonissen, Steven Schalekamp, Horst K Hahn, Kicky G van Leeuwen, Colin Jacobs","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12580-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the capabilities of CE-marked AI products for lung nodule analysis in lung cancer screening (LCS), quantify their coverage of tasks defined in nodule management recommendations, and assess their peer-reviewed evidence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six core tasks in LCS (nodule detection, classification, measurement, growth assessment, malignancy risk estimation, and structured management) were derived from 4 nodule management recommendations: Lung-RADS 2022, British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines, European Union Position Statement (EUPS), and European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI). Products were identified through www.healthairegister.com . Vendors confirmed capabilities using a standardized questionnaire; public documentation supplemented non-responders. Task coverage was calculated as the percentage of functional overlap (0-100%) per recommendation. Peer-reviewed evidence was evaluated using a six-level efficacy framework and assessed for study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 16 products from 16 vendors were included; 10 vendors completed questionnaires. Analysis showed that 14 products detect and measure solid and subsolid nodules, 12 support growth assessment, and 9 provide malignancy risk estimation (PanCan in 5, AI-based scores in 4). No product provides support for endobronchial or cystic lesions. High task coverage (> 75%) was observed in 10 products for EUPS and 4 for BTS, whereas no product achieved high coverage for Lung-RADS or ESTI. Overall, 60 peer-reviewed studies were identified; 7% were prospective and evidence clustered at lower efficacy levels: 70% assessed diagnostic accuracy, while none reported patient outcomes or societal impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Numerous CE-certified AI products could support CT-based lung cancer screening, but gaps in task coverage and predominantly lower-level evidence necessitate cautious, monitored implementation.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Do commercially available AI products for lung nodule analysis functionally cover international nodule management recommendation-defined tasks, and what peer-reviewed clinical evidence supports them? Findings AI products support standard nodule detection and measurement in line with management recommendations but lack support for endobronchial or cystic lesions and high-level clinical evidence. Clinical relevance CE-marked AI products can assist radiologists with core lung cancer screening tasks, but capability gaps exist. Limited high-level clinical evidence complicates integrating AI into guidelines, securing reimbursement, and formulating recommendations for its use in lung cancer screening programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commercial AI for CT lung cancer screening: product capabilities, coverage of nodule management tasks and supporting evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Noa Antonissen, Steven Schalekamp, Horst K Hahn, Kicky G van Leeuwen, Colin Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-026-12580-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the capabilities of CE-marked AI products for lung nodule analysis in lung cancer screening (LCS), quantify their coverage of tasks defined in nodule management recommendations, and assess their peer-reviewed evidence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six core tasks in LCS (nodule detection, classification, measurement, growth assessment, malignancy risk estimation, and structured management) were derived from 4 nodule management recommendations: Lung-RADS 2022, British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines, European Union Position Statement (EUPS), and European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI). Products were identified through www.healthairegister.com . Vendors confirmed capabilities using a standardized questionnaire; public documentation supplemented non-responders. Task coverage was calculated as the percentage of functional overlap (0-100%) per recommendation. Peer-reviewed evidence was evaluated using a six-level efficacy framework and assessed for study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 16 products from 16 vendors were included; 10 vendors completed questionnaires. Analysis showed that 14 products detect and measure solid and subsolid nodules, 12 support growth assessment, and 9 provide malignancy risk estimation (PanCan in 5, AI-based scores in 4). No product provides support for endobronchial or cystic lesions. High task coverage (> 75%) was observed in 10 products for EUPS and 4 for BTS, whereas no product achieved high coverage for Lung-RADS or ESTI. Overall, 60 peer-reviewed studies were identified; 7% were prospective and evidence clustered at lower efficacy levels: 70% assessed diagnostic accuracy, while none reported patient outcomes or societal impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Numerous CE-certified AI products could support CT-based lung cancer screening, but gaps in task coverage and predominantly lower-level evidence necessitate cautious, monitored implementation.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Do commercially available AI products for lung nodule analysis functionally cover international nodule management recommendation-defined tasks, and what peer-reviewed clinical evidence supports them? Findings AI products support standard nodule detection and measurement in line with management recommendations but lack support for endobronchial or cystic lesions and high-level clinical evidence. Clinical relevance CE-marked AI products can assist radiologists with core lung cancer screening tasks, but capability gaps exist. Limited high-level clinical evidence complicates integrating AI into guidelines, securing reimbursement, and formulating recommendations for its use in lung cancer screening programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12580-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12580-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Commercial AI for CT lung cancer screening: product capabilities, coverage of nodule management tasks and supporting evidence.
Objectives: To characterize the capabilities of CE-marked AI products for lung nodule analysis in lung cancer screening (LCS), quantify their coverage of tasks defined in nodule management recommendations, and assess their peer-reviewed evidence.
Materials and methods: Six core tasks in LCS (nodule detection, classification, measurement, growth assessment, malignancy risk estimation, and structured management) were derived from 4 nodule management recommendations: Lung-RADS 2022, British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines, European Union Position Statement (EUPS), and European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI). Products were identified through www.healthairegister.com . Vendors confirmed capabilities using a standardized questionnaire; public documentation supplemented non-responders. Task coverage was calculated as the percentage of functional overlap (0-100%) per recommendation. Peer-reviewed evidence was evaluated using a six-level efficacy framework and assessed for study characteristics.
Results: In total, 16 products from 16 vendors were included; 10 vendors completed questionnaires. Analysis showed that 14 products detect and measure solid and subsolid nodules, 12 support growth assessment, and 9 provide malignancy risk estimation (PanCan in 5, AI-based scores in 4). No product provides support for endobronchial or cystic lesions. High task coverage (> 75%) was observed in 10 products for EUPS and 4 for BTS, whereas no product achieved high coverage for Lung-RADS or ESTI. Overall, 60 peer-reviewed studies were identified; 7% were prospective and evidence clustered at lower efficacy levels: 70% assessed diagnostic accuracy, while none reported patient outcomes or societal impact.
Conclusion: Numerous CE-certified AI products could support CT-based lung cancer screening, but gaps in task coverage and predominantly lower-level evidence necessitate cautious, monitored implementation.
Key points: Question Do commercially available AI products for lung nodule analysis functionally cover international nodule management recommendation-defined tasks, and what peer-reviewed clinical evidence supports them? Findings AI products support standard nodule detection and measurement in line with management recommendations but lack support for endobronchial or cystic lesions and high-level clinical evidence. Clinical relevance CE-marked AI products can assist radiologists with core lung cancer screening tasks, but capability gaps exist. Limited high-level clinical evidence complicates integrating AI into guidelines, securing reimbursement, and formulating recommendations for its use in lung cancer screening programs.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.