用于CT肺癌筛查的商业AI:产品能力、结节管理任务的覆盖范围和支持证据。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Noa Antonissen, Steven Schalekamp, Horst K Hahn, Kicky G van Leeuwen, Colin Jacobs
{"title":"用于CT肺癌筛查的商业AI:产品能力、结节管理任务的覆盖范围和支持证据。","authors":"Noa Antonissen, Steven Schalekamp, Horst K Hahn, Kicky G van Leeuwen, Colin Jacobs","doi":"10.1007/s00330-026-12580-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the capabilities of CE-marked AI products for lung nodule analysis in lung cancer screening (LCS), quantify their coverage of tasks defined in nodule management recommendations, and assess their peer-reviewed evidence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six core tasks in LCS (nodule detection, classification, measurement, growth assessment, malignancy risk estimation, and structured management) were derived from 4 nodule management recommendations: Lung-RADS 2022, British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines, European Union Position Statement (EUPS), and European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI). Products were identified through www.healthairegister.com . Vendors confirmed capabilities using a standardized questionnaire; public documentation supplemented non-responders. Task coverage was calculated as the percentage of functional overlap (0-100%) per recommendation. Peer-reviewed evidence was evaluated using a six-level efficacy framework and assessed for study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 16 products from 16 vendors were included; 10 vendors completed questionnaires. Analysis showed that 14 products detect and measure solid and subsolid nodules, 12 support growth assessment, and 9 provide malignancy risk estimation (PanCan in 5, AI-based scores in 4). No product provides support for endobronchial or cystic lesions. High task coverage (> 75%) was observed in 10 products for EUPS and 4 for BTS, whereas no product achieved high coverage for Lung-RADS or ESTI. Overall, 60 peer-reviewed studies were identified; 7% were prospective and evidence clustered at lower efficacy levels: 70% assessed diagnostic accuracy, while none reported patient outcomes or societal impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Numerous CE-certified AI products could support CT-based lung cancer screening, but gaps in task coverage and predominantly lower-level evidence necessitate cautious, monitored implementation.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Do commercially available AI products for lung nodule analysis functionally cover international nodule management recommendation-defined tasks, and what peer-reviewed clinical evidence supports them? Findings AI products support standard nodule detection and measurement in line with management recommendations but lack support for endobronchial or cystic lesions and high-level clinical evidence. Clinical relevance CE-marked AI products can assist radiologists with core lung cancer screening tasks, but capability gaps exist. Limited high-level clinical evidence complicates integrating AI into guidelines, securing reimbursement, and formulating recommendations for its use in lung cancer screening programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commercial AI for CT lung cancer screening: product capabilities, coverage of nodule management tasks and supporting evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Noa Antonissen, Steven Schalekamp, Horst K Hahn, Kicky G van Leeuwen, Colin Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-026-12580-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To characterize the capabilities of CE-marked AI products for lung nodule analysis in lung cancer screening (LCS), quantify their coverage of tasks defined in nodule management recommendations, and assess their peer-reviewed evidence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six core tasks in LCS (nodule detection, classification, measurement, growth assessment, malignancy risk estimation, and structured management) were derived from 4 nodule management recommendations: Lung-RADS 2022, British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines, European Union Position Statement (EUPS), and European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI). Products were identified through www.healthairegister.com . Vendors confirmed capabilities using a standardized questionnaire; public documentation supplemented non-responders. Task coverage was calculated as the percentage of functional overlap (0-100%) per recommendation. Peer-reviewed evidence was evaluated using a six-level efficacy framework and assessed for study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 16 products from 16 vendors were included; 10 vendors completed questionnaires. Analysis showed that 14 products detect and measure solid and subsolid nodules, 12 support growth assessment, and 9 provide malignancy risk estimation (PanCan in 5, AI-based scores in 4). No product provides support for endobronchial or cystic lesions. High task coverage (> 75%) was observed in 10 products for EUPS and 4 for BTS, whereas no product achieved high coverage for Lung-RADS or ESTI. Overall, 60 peer-reviewed studies were identified; 7% were prospective and evidence clustered at lower efficacy levels: 70% assessed diagnostic accuracy, while none reported patient outcomes or societal impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Numerous CE-certified AI products could support CT-based lung cancer screening, but gaps in task coverage and predominantly lower-level evidence necessitate cautious, monitored implementation.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Do commercially available AI products for lung nodule analysis functionally cover international nodule management recommendation-defined tasks, and what peer-reviewed clinical evidence supports them? Findings AI products support standard nodule detection and measurement in line with management recommendations but lack support for endobronchial or cystic lesions and high-level clinical evidence. Clinical relevance CE-marked AI products can assist radiologists with core lung cancer screening tasks, but capability gaps exist. Limited high-level clinical evidence complicates integrating AI into guidelines, securing reimbursement, and formulating recommendations for its use in lung cancer screening programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12580-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12580-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:表征ce标记的人工智能产品在肺癌筛查(LCS)中用于肺结节分析的能力,量化其在结节管理建议中定义的任务范围,并评估其同行评审的证据。材料和方法:LCS的六项核心任务(结节检测、分类、测量、生长评估、恶性风险评估和结构化管理)来源于4项结节管理建议:Lung-RADS 2022、英国胸科学会(BTS)指南、欧盟立场声明(EUPS)和欧洲胸影像学会(ESTI)。产品通过www.healthairegister.com确定。供应商使用标准化问卷确认能力;公共文档补充了无应答者。任务覆盖率计算为每个建议的功能重叠的百分比(0-100%)。采用6级疗效框架对同行评议的证据进行评估,并对研究特征进行评估。结果:共纳入16家厂商的16种产品;10位供应商完成了问卷调查。分析显示,14种产品检测和测量实性和亚实性结节,12种支持生长评估,9种提供恶性肿瘤风险评估(PanCan有5种,ai评分有4种)。没有产品提供支气管内或囊性病变的支持。在10个EUPS产品和4个BTS产品中观察到高任务覆盖率(约75%),而在Lung-RADS或ESTI中没有产品达到高覆盖率。总共确定了60项同行评议研究;7%是前瞻性的,证据集中在较低的疗效水平:70%评估诊断准确性,而没有报告患者结局或社会影响。结论:许多ce认证的人工智能产品可以支持基于ct的肺癌筛查,但任务覆盖范围的差距和主要的低水平证据需要谨慎、监测地实施。市售的用于肺结节分析的人工智能产品是否涵盖了国际结节管理推荐定义的任务?有哪些同行评议的临床证据支持这些任务?人工智能产品支持符合管理建议的标准结节检测和测量,但缺乏对支气管内或囊性病变的支持和高水平的临床证据。临床相关性ce标记的人工智能产品可以帮助放射科医生完成核心的肺癌筛查任务,但存在能力差距。有限的高水平临床证据使得将人工智能纳入指南、确保报销以及为其在肺癌筛查项目中的使用制定建议变得复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commercial AI for CT lung cancer screening: product capabilities, coverage of nodule management tasks and supporting evidence.

Objectives: To characterize the capabilities of CE-marked AI products for lung nodule analysis in lung cancer screening (LCS), quantify their coverage of tasks defined in nodule management recommendations, and assess their peer-reviewed evidence.

Materials and methods: Six core tasks in LCS (nodule detection, classification, measurement, growth assessment, malignancy risk estimation, and structured management) were derived from 4 nodule management recommendations: Lung-RADS 2022, British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines, European Union Position Statement (EUPS), and European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI). Products were identified through www.healthairegister.com . Vendors confirmed capabilities using a standardized questionnaire; public documentation supplemented non-responders. Task coverage was calculated as the percentage of functional overlap (0-100%) per recommendation. Peer-reviewed evidence was evaluated using a six-level efficacy framework and assessed for study characteristics.

Results: In total, 16 products from 16 vendors were included; 10 vendors completed questionnaires. Analysis showed that 14 products detect and measure solid and subsolid nodules, 12 support growth assessment, and 9 provide malignancy risk estimation (PanCan in 5, AI-based scores in 4). No product provides support for endobronchial or cystic lesions. High task coverage (> 75%) was observed in 10 products for EUPS and 4 for BTS, whereas no product achieved high coverage for Lung-RADS or ESTI. Overall, 60 peer-reviewed studies were identified; 7% were prospective and evidence clustered at lower efficacy levels: 70% assessed diagnostic accuracy, while none reported patient outcomes or societal impact.

Conclusion: Numerous CE-certified AI products could support CT-based lung cancer screening, but gaps in task coverage and predominantly lower-level evidence necessitate cautious, monitored implementation.

Key points: Question Do commercially available AI products for lung nodule analysis functionally cover international nodule management recommendation-defined tasks, and what peer-reviewed clinical evidence supports them? Findings AI products support standard nodule detection and measurement in line with management recommendations but lack support for endobronchial or cystic lesions and high-level clinical evidence. Clinical relevance CE-marked AI products can assist radiologists with core lung cancer screening tasks, but capability gaps exist. Limited high-level clinical evidence complicates integrating AI into guidelines, securing reimbursement, and formulating recommendations for its use in lung cancer screening programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书