儿童执行功能RPM父母评定量表:目的和性质。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Paul T Cirino, Cristina E Boada, Cassidy M Salentine
{"title":"儿童执行功能RPM父母评定量表:目的和性质。","authors":"Paul T Cirino, Cristina E Boada, Cassidy M Salentine","doi":"10.1177/10731911261442022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of this study is to provide the psychometric properties of a new measure of executive function (EF), based on the representation, planning, monitoring/execution (RPM) process framework. Two versions of the EF RPM scale are contrasted with a different rating scale of EF, and further related to relevant associated outcomes. Results show positive distributional, reliability, and validity evidence for the EF RPM scale. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that items aligned with their assigned factor, and the factors were strongly related to one another as expected with a unitary EF process. The two versions of the EF RPM scale showed good convergent validity with another EF scale and expected relations with functional outcomes and demographic characteristics. The EF RPM scale also showed stronger discriminant validity relative to a different EF scale for non-EF behavioral symptomatology. Future work needs to gather additional evidence for these scales in different contexts and settings (e.g., in specific populations, in clinics) and in relation to other outcomes (e.g., achievement, daily life outcomes, cognitive variables).</p>","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911261442022"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Executive Function RPM Parent Rating Scale for Children: Purpose and Properties.\",\"authors\":\"Paul T Cirino, Cristina E Boada, Cassidy M Salentine\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10731911261442022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The goal of this study is to provide the psychometric properties of a new measure of executive function (EF), based on the representation, planning, monitoring/execution (RPM) process framework. Two versions of the EF RPM scale are contrasted with a different rating scale of EF, and further related to relevant associated outcomes. Results show positive distributional, reliability, and validity evidence for the EF RPM scale. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that items aligned with their assigned factor, and the factors were strongly related to one another as expected with a unitary EF process. The two versions of the EF RPM scale showed good convergent validity with another EF scale and expected relations with functional outcomes and demographic characteristics. The EF RPM scale also showed stronger discriminant validity relative to a different EF scale for non-EF behavioral symptomatology. Future work needs to gather additional evidence for these scales in different contexts and settings (e.g., in specific populations, in clinics) and in relation to other outcomes (e.g., achievement, daily life outcomes, cognitive variables).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10731911261442022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261442022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911261442022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是在表征、计划、监测/执行(RPM)过程框架的基础上,提供一种新的执行功能(EF)测量方法的心理测量特性。两个版本的EF RPM量表与EF的不同评定量表进行对比,并进一步与相关的相关结果相关联。结果显示EF RPM量表具有正的分布、信度和效度证据。验证性因子分析表明,项目与其分配的因子一致,并且在单一EF过程中,各因素之间的相关性如预期的那样强。两个版本的EF RPM量表与另一个EF量表具有良好的收敛效度,并与功能结局和人口学特征具有预期的关系。EF RPM量表在非EF行为症状方面也比不同的EF量表显示出更强的判别效度。未来的工作需要为这些量表在不同的背景和环境中(例如,在特定人群中,在诊所中)以及与其他结果(例如,成就,日常生活结果,认知变量)的关系收集更多的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Executive Function RPM Parent Rating Scale for Children: Purpose and Properties.

The goal of this study is to provide the psychometric properties of a new measure of executive function (EF), based on the representation, planning, monitoring/execution (RPM) process framework. Two versions of the EF RPM scale are contrasted with a different rating scale of EF, and further related to relevant associated outcomes. Results show positive distributional, reliability, and validity evidence for the EF RPM scale. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that items aligned with their assigned factor, and the factors were strongly related to one another as expected with a unitary EF process. The two versions of the EF RPM scale showed good convergent validity with another EF scale and expected relations with functional outcomes and demographic characteristics. The EF RPM scale also showed stronger discriminant validity relative to a different EF scale for non-EF behavioral symptomatology. Future work needs to gather additional evidence for these scales in different contexts and settings (e.g., in specific populations, in clinics) and in relation to other outcomes (e.g., achievement, daily life outcomes, cognitive variables).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessment
Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Assessment publishes articles in the domain of applied clinical assessment. The emphasis of this journal is on publication of information of relevance to the use of assessment measures, including test development, validation, and interpretation practices. The scope of the journal includes research that can inform assessment practices in mental health, forensic, medical, and other applied settings. Papers that focus on the assessment of cognitive and neuropsychological functioning, personality, and psychopathology are invited. Most papers published in Assessment report the results of original empirical research, however integrative review articles and scholarly case studies will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书