评估基于废水的流行病学规范化方法:系统综述

IF 3.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Tahmina Ahmed, Sarah E. Philo, Alexandria B. Boehm, Rolf U. Halden, Kyle Bibby and Jeseth Delgado Vela
{"title":"评估基于废水的流行病学规范化方法:系统综述","authors":"Tahmina Ahmed, Sarah E. Philo, Alexandria B. Boehm, Rolf U. Halden, Kyle Bibby and Jeseth Delgado Vela","doi":"10.1039/D5EW01049G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has emerged as a powerful tool for monitoring community level infectious disease trends. However, there is a lack of consistent normalization and control practices across studies that limits data interpretability and comparability. In this review, we analyzed 247 articles to assess current normalization approaches, focusing on the use of biomarkers and their associated normalization goals. We identified substantial variability in marker selection, application, and reporting, often without clear explanation. Endogenous markers such as pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) and CrAssphage were frequently used, primarily to adjust fecal strength, while exogenous controls such as bovine coronavirus (BCoV) and MS2 bacteriophage were commonly applied to evaluate sample recovery efficiency. However, there is no clear distinction between these functions in the literature. Additionally, normalization goals were often unspecified; when reported, they generally were for adjusting flow variability, correlating with clinical data, and accounting for population size. Mapping control types to normalization goals revealed a diverse range of applications but highlighted a lack of standardization. We emphasize the importance of standardized reporting guidelines, including clear documentation of normalization strategies and quality assurance measures, to improve reproducibility, facilitate meta-analyses, and strengthen the role of WBE in public health surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":75,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","volume":" 5","pages":" 1374-1382"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2026/ew/d5ew01049g?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing normalization methods in wastewater based epidemiology: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Tahmina Ahmed, Sarah E. Philo, Alexandria B. Boehm, Rolf U. Halden, Kyle Bibby and Jeseth Delgado Vela\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5EW01049G\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has emerged as a powerful tool for monitoring community level infectious disease trends. However, there is a lack of consistent normalization and control practices across studies that limits data interpretability and comparability. In this review, we analyzed 247 articles to assess current normalization approaches, focusing on the use of biomarkers and their associated normalization goals. We identified substantial variability in marker selection, application, and reporting, often without clear explanation. Endogenous markers such as pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) and CrAssphage were frequently used, primarily to adjust fecal strength, while exogenous controls such as bovine coronavirus (BCoV) and MS2 bacteriophage were commonly applied to evaluate sample recovery efficiency. However, there is no clear distinction between these functions in the literature. Additionally, normalization goals were often unspecified; when reported, they generally were for adjusting flow variability, correlating with clinical data, and accounting for population size. Mapping control types to normalization goals revealed a diverse range of applications but highlighted a lack of standardization. We emphasize the importance of standardized reporting guidelines, including clear documentation of normalization strategies and quality assurance measures, to improve reproducibility, facilitate meta-analyses, and strengthen the role of WBE in public health surveillance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\" 1374-1382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2026/ew/d5ew01049g?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/ew/d5ew01049g\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2026/ew/d5ew01049g","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于废水的流行病学(WBE)已成为监测社区一级传染病趋势的有力工具。然而,缺乏一致的标准化和控制实践,限制了数据的可解释性和可比性。在这篇综述中,我们分析了247篇文章来评估当前的规范化方法,重点关注生物标志物的使用及其相关的规范化目标。我们在标记选择、应用和报告中发现了大量的可变性,通常没有明确的解释。内源标记物如辣椒轻度斑疹病毒(PMMoV)和CrAssphage被频繁使用,主要用于调节粪便强度,而外源对照物如牛冠状病毒(BCoV)和MS2噬菌体通常用于评估样品回收率。然而,这些功能在文献中并没有明确的区分。此外,标准化目标通常没有明确;当报告时,它们通常用于调整流量变异性,与临床数据相关,并考虑人口规模。将控制类型映射到规范化目标揭示了应用程序的多样性,但突出了标准化的缺乏。我们强调标准化报告准则的重要性,包括标准化战略和质量保证措施的明确文件,以提高可重复性,促进荟萃分析,并加强WBE在公共卫生监测中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing normalization methods in wastewater based epidemiology: a systematic review

Assessing normalization methods in wastewater based epidemiology: a systematic review

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has emerged as a powerful tool for monitoring community level infectious disease trends. However, there is a lack of consistent normalization and control practices across studies that limits data interpretability and comparability. In this review, we analyzed 247 articles to assess current normalization approaches, focusing on the use of biomarkers and their associated normalization goals. We identified substantial variability in marker selection, application, and reporting, often without clear explanation. Endogenous markers such as pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) and CrAssphage were frequently used, primarily to adjust fecal strength, while exogenous controls such as bovine coronavirus (BCoV) and MS2 bacteriophage were commonly applied to evaluate sample recovery efficiency. However, there is no clear distinction between these functions in the literature. Additionally, normalization goals were often unspecified; when reported, they generally were for adjusting flow variability, correlating with clinical data, and accounting for population size. Mapping control types to normalization goals revealed a diverse range of applications but highlighted a lack of standardization. We emphasize the importance of standardized reporting guidelines, including clear documentation of normalization strategies and quality assurance measures, to improve reproducibility, facilitate meta-analyses, and strengthen the role of WBE in public health surveillance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology seeks to showcase high quality research about fundamental science, innovative technologies, and management practices that promote sustainable water.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书